Remote Preconditioning Over Time To Empower Cerebral Tissue (REM-PROTECT)

March 9, 2021 updated by: Latisha Sharma, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Pilot, Randomized, Controlled, Staggered Start, Feasibility Trial of Ischemic Preconditioning, a Promising Novel Treatment for Stroke Prevention

Previous studies in animals and humans has shown that brief periods of reduced blood flow to one organ or tissue in the body can help protect other tissues from subsequent injury caused by reduced blood flow such as a stroke. This phenomenon is known as remote ischemic preconditioning and may help protect brain cells after a stroke. The investigators are studying a specific stroke type called subcortical stroke that is very common and has a high rate of recurrent stroke and cognition problems despite intensive prevention measures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, the investigators will enroll 60 patients. All patients will receive best standard medical therapy for 2 years. In addition, the investigators will randomly assign 40 patients to undergo daily active remote ischemic preconditioning for 1 year, and 20 patients to 1 year of standard medical therapy followed by 1 year of daily active remote ischemic preconditioning. Patient structured interviews will be performed to assess if the treatment is well tolerated and easy for stroke patients to use. Magnetic resonance (MR) pictures of the brain will be used to determine if the active treatment stops the progression of brain injury. Cognitive tests and wireless sensor technology measures will used to learn what happens to the patient's brain and body during the active treatment.

After a subject consents to participate in the study, he/she will first participate in a study screening phase to ensure a basic level of tolerability of Remote Ischemic Conditioning (autoRIC™) device. The subject will undergo one full cycle of treatment under observation of the study team, including 4 cycles of alternating 5 minute inflation and 5 minute off periods

If the subject indicates willingness to continue receiving such treatment (screening success), she/she will enter the randomized trial phase, and be randomly allocated to the treatment or control group.

If subject indicates unwillingness to continue receiving such treatment (screening failure), he/she will not advance to the randomized phase of the trial. Screen failure subjects will be followed up with a 3-day post-device screening phone call to ensure safety and obtain information regarding any adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California Los Angeles UCLA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

I. Clinical

  1. Clinical lacunar stroke syndrome within the past 6 months
  2. Absence of signs or symptoms of cortical dysfunction
  3. No proximal large vessel atherosclerosis, intracranial atherosclerosis or cerebellar stroke.
  4. No major cardioembolic source requiring anticoagulation or other specific therapy

II. Imaging

  1. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) presence of a small subcortical ischemic, any 1 or more of:

    1. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion < 2.0cm in size at largest dimension and corresponding to the clinical syndrome.
    2. Well delineated focal hyperintensity <2.0 cm in size at largest dimension (including rostro-caudal extent) on FLAIR or T2 and clearly corresponding to the clinical syndrome. If other focal hyperintensities are present, the case will be discussed with the principal investigator prior to randomization
    3. Multiple (at least 2) hypointense lesions of size 0.3-1.5 cm at largest dimension (including rostro-caudal extent) only in the cerebral hemispheres on FLAIR or T1 in patients whose qualifying event is clinically hemispheric
    4. Well delinated hypointense lesion <1.5 cm in size at the largest dimension (including rostro-caudal extent) on FLAIR or T1 corresponding to the clinical syndrome. MRI must be done at least 1 months after the qualifying stroke
  2. Absence of cortical stroke and large (> 1.5cm) subcortical stroke, recent or remote
  3. White matter hyperintensity score of 2 (moderate) or 3 (severe) on the European Scale of Age-Related White Matter Change
  4. Absence of cerebral amyloid antipathy (CAA) as per Boston Criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Disabling stroke (Rankin Scale ≥4)
  2. Previous intracranial hemorrhage (excluding traumatic) or hemorrhagic stroke
  3. Age under 40 years
  4. High risk of bleeding (e.g. recurrent GI or GU bleeding, active peptic ulcer disease, etc.)
  5. Anticipated requirement for long term use of anticoagulants (e.g. recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT)
  6. Prior cortical or retinal stroke (diagnosed either clinically or by neuroimaging), or other prior cortical or retinal transient ischemic attack (TIA)
  7. Prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy
  8. Impaired renal function: estimated GFR <40
  9. Intolerance or contraindications to aspirin or clopidogrel (including thrombocytopenia, prolonged INR)
  10. Mini Mental Status Exam score < 24 (adjusted for age and education)
  11. Medical contraindication to MRI
  12. Pregnancy or women of child-bearing age who are not following an effective method of contraception
  13. Pre-existing neurologic, psychiatric, or advanced systemic disease that would confound the neurological or functional outcome evaluations
  14. SBP <90 or > 200
  15. Known history of limb vascular disease, limb vascular bypass surgery, or limb deep venous thrombosis
  16. Prisoners
  17. Homeless individuals
  18. Patient unable to give informed consent and no available legally authorized representative to provide informed consent
  19. Patient unlikely to be compliant with therapy/ unwilling to return for follow up visits
  20. Concurrent participation in another study with investigational drug or device treatment
  21. Other likely specific cause of stroke (e.g. dissection, vasculitis, prothrombotic diathesis, drug abuse)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Medical therapy only
Intensive standard medical secondary prevention stroke treatment as per the recommendations of the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association national guidelines.
Active Comparator: Ischemic Preconditioning + Medical
Patients will receive treatment with Cell Aegis remote ischemic preconditioning device once or twice daily for one year. The procedure will consist of up to four 5-minute cycles of bilateral upper extremity ischemia separated by five minutes of reperfusion. Patients will also receive intensive standard medical secondary prevention stroke treatment as per the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association national guidelines.
Patients will undergo ischemic preconditioning once or twice daily for up to four 5-minutes cycles of bilateral upper extremity ischemia separated by 5-minute periods of reperfusion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Duration of Adherence to Ischemic Preconditioning Procedure
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Limb Ischemia as Assessed by the Preconditioning Device
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Patient Self-reported Comfort-discomfort on a Scale of 1-5, With Lowest Score = "Very Comfortable" and 5 = "Very Uncomfortable"
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Latisha K Sharma, MD, University of California, Los Angeles

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Preconditioning

3
Subscribe