Comparison of Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and Lantus Based Insulin Regimen in the Management of Hypoglycemia in the Hospitalized Patients in Noncritical Care Setting

September 27, 2017 updated by: Iqbal Munir, MD, PhD, Riverside University Health System Medical Center
The goal of the current study is to determine difference in glycemic control between traditional split mix regimen with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and regular insulin vs basal bolus regimen with glargine and humalog in a population of type 2 diabetes commonly encountered in the investigators county hospital setting which include newly diagnosed type 2 patients and patients on relatively high dose of insulin (dose >0.4 units/kg body weight. Primary outcome of the study is to determine differences in glycemic control between treatment group as measured by the mean daily blood glucose. Secondary outcome is to measure number of hypoglycemic events, number of severe hypoglycemia and length of hospital stay.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The effect of insulin depends not only on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a particular preparation, but also on patient specific factors which includes state of inflammation, obesity etc. Although effect on glucose disposal is the central to insulin action, there could be differences of insulin action on other metabolic parameters. It is not known if there is a difference in suppression of inflammation with improved glycemic control which could vary with analog insulin. It is unknown if natural insulin (NPH, recombinant human insulin with protamine) differs from insulin analogs (glargine and detemir, made by substituting amino acid in the native sequence) in terms of metabolic outcome other than glucose disposal.

At this point it is uncertain if there is any clear benefit of use of lantus over NPH in inpatient glycemic management. Currently, both lantus and NPH based regimen is practiced in inpatient hospital setting. Current practice of inpatient insulin regimen is based more on familiarity of physicians with a particular insulin type and personal preference rather than evidenced based knowledge. Lantus is an expensive insulin preparation compared to NPH with uncertain benefit in inpatient setting. Current research proposal will compare this two insulin based regimen in the management of diabetes of hospitalized patients. Information obtained through this research will guide the investigators practice in this institution as well as in other institutions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Moreno Valley, California, United States, 92555
        • Riverside County Regional Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with type II diabetes regardless of duration of diagnosis with an admission blood glucose level between 140 mg/dL to 400 mg/dL will be included in the study.
  • Other inclusion criteria are as follows:

    • age 18-80 years old
    • treated with diet alone
    • any combination of oral anti-diabetic agents or insulin treatment with any dosage before admission.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hyperglycemia without a known history of diabetes
  • H/o recent cardiac surgery (within 6 months)
  • Impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate less than 45)
  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis
  • Diabetes mellitus type 1
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients on steroid treatment
  • Known hypopituitarism or adrenal insufficiency
  • Known hypoglycemia of unawareness
  • Length of stay <48 h
  • And severe liver disease and patent admitted in intensive care unit.
  • Patients already received an insulin dose greater than 0.5 units/kg body weight after admission prior to initiation of study protocol will be excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NPH and regular insuline group
For the group receiving NPH and regular 2/3 and 1/3 formula will be followed. If Nil per os (NPO), patient will receive NPH twice daily but AM dose will equal to PM dose. Regular insulin given along with NPH will be held while patient is NPO. A correctional dose of regular insulin will be given for any blood glucose >180 mg/dL. If subjects were not eating, they could also receive correctional doses of regular insulin. Correctional insulin could be given four times daily with meals or at bedtime.
Active Comparator: glargine and humalog group
Half of the total insulin dose will be given as glargine once daily, either in the AM or in the PM, depending on when the patient was enrolled. The other half of the total daily insulin dose was given as humalog; doses were divided equally between breakfast, lunch, and dinner. An additional correctional dose of humalog will be given for any blood glucose >180 mg/dL. If subjects were not eating, they received glargine once daily and could also receive correctional doses of humalog. Correctional humalog could be given four times daily with meals or at bedtime.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
difference in glycemic control between treatment groups as measured by the mean daily blood glucose
Time Frame: Duration of hospital stay, up to 24 weeks
Primary outcome of the study is to determine differences in glycemic control between treatment group as measured by the mean daily blood glucose
Duration of hospital stay, up to 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of hypoglycemic events
Time Frame: duration of hospital stay, up to 24 weeks
number of hypoglycemic events
duration of hospital stay, up to 24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on NPH and regular insulin

3
Subscribe