Postoperative Radiotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Accelerated vs. Conventional Fractionation

July 21, 2020 updated by: Dr. Rebecca Bütof, Technische Universität Dresden
In this randomized multicentric phase II study it will be investigated whether an accelerated postoperative radiotherapy with photons or protons (7 fractions per week, 2 Gy single dose) may improve locoregional tumour control in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in comparison to conventional fractionation (5 fractions per week, 2 Gy single dose).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized multicentric trial. Within this study an accelerated irradiation schedule (7 fractions per week, 2 Gy single dose) will be compared with the currently used conventional fractionation schedule (5 fractions per week, 2 Gy single dose) for postoperative radiotherapy with photons or protons in patients with NSCLC. The primary endpoint is locoregional tumour control after 36 months. Secondary endpoints are overall survival of patients, local recurrence-free and distant metastases-free survival after 36 months, acute and late toxicity as well as quality of life for both treatment methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology
      • Hamburg, Germany, 21075
        • Praxis für Strahlentherapie Hamburg-Harburg
      • Homburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology
      • München, Germany, 81377
        • Klinikum der Universität München,Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology
      • München, Germany, 81675
        • Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology
      • Stuttgart, Germany
        • Marienhospital Stuttgart, Department of Radiotherapy and Palliative Medicine
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72016
        • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology
      • Olsztyn, Poland, 10-228
        • SPZOZ MSW; Warmia & Mazury Oncology Center; Warmia & Mazury Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • histologically confirmed non-small cell lung cancer
  • previous tumor resection with curative intention
  • postoperative indication for irradiation (> pN1 and/ or R1)
  • R2-resection or recurrence postoperative/after adjuvant chemotherapy diagnosed by the restaging-imaging
  • exclusion of distant metastases (M0)
  • age > 18 years
  • good general condition (ECOG performance status 0 or 1)
  • written informed consent
  • appropriate compliance to ensure close follow-up
  • women of childbearing age: adequate contraception

Exclusion Criteria:

  • histologically confirmed small cell lung cancer
  • distant metastases
  • no written informed consent or lack of cooperation relating to therapy or follow-up
  • previous (< 5 years) or concomitant other malignant disease (exception: malignant disease, which is very likely healed and not influenced therapy or follow up of the non-small cell lung cancer, e.g. carcinoma in-situ, basaliomas, very early skin cancers)
  • for proton therapy: heart pacemaker
  • previous radiotherapy of the thorax or lower neck region
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • participation in another intervention study or not completed follow-up of a intervention study. Exceptions are psychological studies, supportive or observation studies, the previous therapy of non-small cell lung cancer is in accordance with the guideline and the participation in radiotherapy studies is not excluded in the trial protocol of the previous study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional fractionation
radiotherapy with conventional fractionation (5 x 2Gy per week)
In this treatment arm patients will receive radiotherapy with the currently used conventional fractionation schedule i.e. 5 fractions per week, 2 Gy single dose.
Active Comparator: accelerated fraction
radiotherapy with accelerated fraction (7 x 2 Gy per week)
In this treatment arm patients will receive radiotherapy with an accelerated fractionation schedule i.e. 7 fractions per week, 2 Gy single dose.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
assessment of local tumor control
Time Frame: 36 months after therapy
Local tumor control will be assessed by appropriate non-invasive (CT or PET-CT) and if necessary invasive examination methods (bronchoscopy with biopsy).
36 months after therapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: 36 months after therapy
Follow-up visits should be continued in all patients until death. Otherwise patients will be censored with date of the last follow-up.
36 months after therapy
local recurrence-free survival
Time Frame: 36 months after therapy
Local-recurrences will be assessed by appropriate non-invasive (CT or PET-CT) and if necessary invasive examination methods (bronchoscopy with biopsy).
36 months after therapy
acute toxicity
Time Frame: Comparison after 20, 50, 100 and 200 patients have been treated. This number of patients is expected to be included after 6, 12, 18 and 40 months.
The occurrence of acute side effects (up to 90 days after start of treatment) will be recorded and documented based on CTCAE 4.0.
Comparison after 20, 50, 100 and 200 patients have been treated. This number of patients is expected to be included after 6, 12, 18 and 40 months.
quality of life
Time Frame: 36 months after therapy
The assessment of quality of life is carried out using the established EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire and the additional lung module QLQ-LC13. Quality of life will be documented immediately before the start of therapy, after completion of postoperative radiotherapy and at every follow-up visit.
36 months after therapy
distant metastases-free survival
Time Frame: 36 months after therapy
Distant metastases will be assessed by PET-CT or abdominal sonography and chest x-ray.
36 months after therapy
late toxicity
Time Frame: Comparison after 20, 50, 100 and 200 patients have been treated. This number of patients is expected to be included after 6, 12, 18 and 40 months.
The occurrence of late side effects will be recorded and documented based on CTCAE 4.0 after every follow-up visit.
Comparison after 20, 50, 100 and 200 patients have been treated. This number of patients is expected to be included after 6, 12, 18 and 40 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Bütof, Dr., Dresden University of Technology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Radiation Therapy and Radiation Oncology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 15, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical Trials on conventional fractionation

3
Subscribe