Health Outcomes After Locomotor Training in Spinal Cord Injury

April 2, 2019 updated by: Sue Ann Sisto, Stony Brook University

Health Outcomes After Locomotor Training in Spinal Cord Injury Across the NeuroRecovery Network

People with spinal cord injury (SCI) suffer from secondary health conditions that can result in undue physical challenges and impact participation in activities in everyday life. Locomotor Training (LT) has been shown to demonstrate improvements in balance and walking function in both the animal and humans by reactivating spinal circuits through intensive therapy of muscles below the level of the injury. However, it is not known if LT also has beneficial health effects and it is the focus of this study proposed to be undertaken at Stony Brook University (SBU) as the lead site. LT is thought to produce activation of spinal networks to help recover balance and walking after SCI and may correspond with improvements in health measures such as bladder function, breathing capacity, cholesterol and other cardiac risk factors markers, and the ability to stand upright without drops in blood pressure resulting in a sensation of dizziness. LT takes place on a treadmill with the body weight supported in a harness, while walking overground and with the practice of key exercises in the home and community. The emphasis is on loading the body through the legs without braces and other devices except where necessary to function at home. The overall objective of this study to capture and analyze health outcome data collected on 80 patients enrolled in the 7 NeuroRecovery Network (NRN) clinics in the USA who receive LT. The NRN is funded by the Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation and the CDC to implement LT for people with SCI. The purpose of this application is to leverage the NRN funding, that provides support for LT and standardized outcome measures, to generate further knowledge on health outcomes after LT for individuals with SCI. The proposed project will be accomplished through the utilization of staff at each of the 6 NRN sites, lead by the study principal investigator and the lead clinical research coordinator at SBU. They will ensure the data are captured before and after LT in a standardized manner, at the correct time and entered into a de-identified database. The study hypotheses are that after LT, compared to before, patients with SCI will improve lipid profiles and insulin factors as measured by fasting blood tests; respiratory function as measured by specialized but easy to use breathing equipment; and blood pressure and heart rate during a maneuver to test for responses to abrupt changes in posture. The relevance of this proposal is that it will help to determine if there is an association between an intensive activity- based intervention (LT) and improvements in health and will be used to form the basis for a larger randomized clinical trial and clinical practice guidelines.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
        • Craig Hospital
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
        • Frazier Rehab
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794-6018
        • Rehabilitation Research and Movement Performance Lab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are classified as AIS C and D must have some lower limb movement or visible voluntary contraction and the capacity to generate a lower limb reciprocal alternating flexion/extension stepping pattern in the step training environment using body weight support on a treadmill with manual facilitation.
  • Patients with AIS A and B need to be able to stand in the BWS harness system without orthostatic hypotension for at least 1 minute.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anti-spasticity medication except night time dose.
  • The use of chemodenervation for spasticity will be avoided for the 3 months prior to NRN admission.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Locomotor Training
Progressive retraining in functional skills including balance, transfers, activities of daily living and ambulation. Compliance to eliminate or minimize lower limb orthotics is also expected to optimize sensory input to the spinal cord and promote optimal recovery. Intensive therapy occurs in all three environments 5 times/ week for 90 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood Assays
Time Frame: Baseline and after 80 sessions of Locomotor Training (LT). If continuous sessions are attended then 5d X 16 weeks or 4 months = 80 sessions.
Study supplements the Locomotor Training program sponsored by the NeuroRecovery Network except for this new study where blood is drawn before and after Locomotor Training (LT)
Baseline and after 80 sessions of Locomotor Training (LT). If continuous sessions are attended then 5d X 16 weeks or 4 months = 80 sessions.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

July 25, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on Locomotor Training

3
Subscribe