Randomized Comparison of ExoSeal® and Angio-Seal Vascular Closure Devices: The CLOSE-UP II Trial (CLOSE-UP II)

May 31, 2017 updated by: Evald Hoej Christiansen, Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Is the ExoSeal VSD non-inferior to Angio-Seal vascular closure device (VSD) in the incidence of adverse access site related events at 30 days.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled, single blind, single center study in 2000 percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients comparing the ExoSeal VCD (test device) to the AngioSeal VCD (standard comparator). In-hospital and 30 days safety and efficacy endpoints and 6 months safety endpoints will be reported.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

818

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aarhus N, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Odense University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Should be able to provide valid informed signed consent
  • PCI procedure including treatment by balloon and/or stent
  • PCI indicated by silent ischemia, stable angina pectoris, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Only coronary angiography
  • Multiple punctures
  • Active infection
  • Groin haematoma before the closure procedure
  • Sheath size > 7 French
  • Known pseudoaneurysm or arteriovenous (AV)-fistula in the ipsilateral groin
  • Prior arterial surgery in abdomen and/or lower extremities
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Life expectancy less than one year
  • The patient is a female of childbearing potential with possible pregnancy or a positive pregnancy test within 7 days before the index procedure or is lactating
  • Simultaneous or planned subsequent femoral vein access
  • Allergy to any of the components in the closure material left in the groin
  • Puncture on same site < 30 days
  • Peripheral artery disease patients can be included at operator´s discretion except if heavy calcification is present at the access site which at the operator's discretion precludes insertion of the VCD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exoseal closure device
Closure device for femoral artery access closure
Closure device for femoral artery access closure
Active Comparator: Angio-Seal closure device
Closure device for femoral artery access closure
Closure device for femoral artery access closure

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence at 30 days of the composite endpoint of access site related major adverse vascular events (MAVE)
Time Frame: 30 days
This includes: major bleeding and/or bleeding necessitating blood transfusion, pseudoaneurysm with indication for treatment, arteriovenous fistula, groin surgery and/or possible related vascular surgery, infection needing antibiotics.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to haemostasis from removing the sheath (AngioSeal) or inserting the device (ExoSeal) until haemostasis
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
Insignificant bleeding seen on the bandage or small continuous oozing is considered haemostasis. Continuous oozing will be counted as a Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 1 bleeding event
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
Device failure
Time Frame: 30 minutes
Combined endpoint of any mechanic failure, deployment failure and/or immediate profuse bleeding needing prolonged manual compression. Individual endpoints will be reported.
30 minutes
Vasovagal reaction until 5 minutes after end of closure procedure
Time Frame: 30 minuts
30 minuts
Need for new onset of manual compression
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Pain and discomfort related to the closure procedure
Time Frame: Closure procedure and 30 days
Assessed on a numerical rating scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain or discomfort) to 10 (worst possible pain or discomfort) Scripted language will be used when discussing pain scores with the patient. Pain and discomfort score will be assessed just before and immediately after the closure procedure and reported. The delta-value will be reported and compared. The patient will be given predefined standardized instructions on how to rate and that only pain and discomfort related to the closure procedure should be assessed
Closure procedure and 30 days
Time to mobilization
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
From start of closure procedure to patient is mobilized. Patients treated for ST-elevation myocardial infarction are assessed separately
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
In-hospital large groin haematoma
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
Larger than 5x5 cm measured by ruler in the catheterization laboratory and at discharge
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 days
Bleedings according to the BARC definitions
Time Frame: 30 days
Access site related and non-access site related
30 days
Major bleeding and/or bleeding necessitating blood transfusion
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Pseudoaneurysm with indication for treatment
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
30 days and 6 months
Arteriovenous fistula
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
30 days and 6 months
Groin surgery and/or possible related vascular surgery
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
30 days and 6 months
Infection needing antibiotics
Time Frame: 30 days and 6 months
30 days and 6 months
Need for medical evaluation of possible closure procedure related symptom(s)
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evald H Christiansen, MD, PhD, Arhus University Hospital Skejby

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 21, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

September 9, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1-10-72-68-12

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Disease

Clinical Trials on Exoseal closure device

3
Subscribe