Comparison of Propranolol and Venlafaxine in Treatment of Vestibular Migraine

January 29, 2015 updated by: Mehti Salviz, MD, Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Effectivity of Propranolol and Venlafaxine in Treatment of Vestibular Migraine: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The presented study aims to compare effectivity of propranolol with effectivity of venlafaxine in escalating dose in subjects with vestibular migraine (VM) over a period of 12 weeks. The study population consisted of subjects diagnosed definite VM according to criteria of Bárány Society and Migraine Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (IHS). Effectivity of therapy was measured by Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), number of vertiginous attack of last month and visual analogue scale (VAS) reported dizziness related Quality of Life (QOL). Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were also used to determine psychiatric improvement played role in response to therapy in venlafaxine treatment arm.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Vestibular migraine (VM) is a condition of episodic vertigo linked to migrainous symptoms described by Nueuhauser et al. in 2001. Some subjects benefit behavior and diet modification and controls of their symptoms. Anti-migrainous medication for prophylactic aim is given subjects who do not benefit life-style improvement. However, there is absence of sufficient evidence for treatment of VM.

In this study the investigators aimed to evaluated effectiveness of prophylactic treatment venlafaxine by comparing propranolol in VM. The investigators also aimed to investigate if the effectiveness of venlafaxine is linked to the improvement of psychiatric condition.

All subjects who were suspected to having VM referred to both M.S. (Department of Otolaryngology) and H.A. (Department of Neurology) in order to ensure subjects fill the criteria of VM and did not have other vestibular disorders. All subjects underwent detailed neurologic, neurotologic examination, audiometric investigation, videonystagmography (VNG) and bithermal caloric testing in order to exclude other or additional vestibular or neurologic disease. Subjects who were18 years or old with a history of (at least 2 months) definite VM according to criteria of Bárány Society and Migraine Classification Subcommittee of the International Headache Society (IHS) were eligible for this study. After a subject fill the eligibility criteria of the study who did not respond to lifestyle or dietary modification were enrolled to the study.

Subjects were enrolled to the study if they filled to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Subjects were randomized using sealed envelop methods by A.K. (Department of Otolaryngology). Before starting intervention protocol Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), number of vertiginous attack of last month and visual analogue scale (VAS) reported dizziness related Quality of Life (QOL), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were obtained from all subjects by T.Y. (Department of Otolaryngology). Subjects were given propranolol or venlafaxine treatment according to randomization with balanced allocation (1:1). The study was unblinded because the study is not an investigational and propranolol was paid by government health insurance. However, venlafaxine is not paid for the migraine therapy by government health insurance and venlafaxine was provided by Institution Research Funding System.

The intervention protocol was carried on by T.Y. under supervision of H.A and M.S.. Propranolol was given in a flexible dose between 40 mg to 160 mg with an escalating fashion starting at 40 mg PO AM for one week and followed by 40 mg AM and 40 mg PM for a total dose up to 160 mg daily. Venlafaxine treatment was followed as: 37.5 mg qhs for two weeks and followed 75 mg qhs with an escalating dose with 2 weeks periods up to 150 mg daily. All participants were asked to self-titrate their medication in case if inform the researchers. Subjects were to be seen at the clinic biweekly for first month in order to evaluated adverse effects and to make sure participants were having sufficient dosage. The effective duration of the treatment was considered as 3 months and participants were asked to continue using their medication one more month in order to evaluate change from baseline to 3rd month in terms of number of vertiginous attacks of the last month. All participants were assessed at the clinic at month 1, 3 and 4. Change from baseline DHI, VAS, BAI and BDI were scored at 4th month.

Adverse effects, reason to exclude the subjects from the study, reason subjects refused to continue the study and other reasons subjects could not follow the protocol were all recorded during clinic visits or obtained over the phone at home.

The analysis primary endpoint was performed following the intention-to-treat (ITT) method. Missing data was handled by multiple imputation method.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

73

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34096
        • Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • vestibular migraine does not respond lifestyle and dietary modification

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergic reaction to venlafaxine or propranolol
  • under the care of psychiatrist
  • pregnancy or intention to become pregnant
  • presence significant illness or medical condition such as cancer, liver or kidney failure
  • certain medical conditions with possible adverse effects with propranolol or venlafaxine following as: AV block or bradyarrhythmia; astma or COPD; diabetes mellitus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Propranolol
Propranolol up to 160 mg/day
Propranolol was given in a flexible dose between 40 mg to 160 mg with an escalating fashion starting at 40 mg PO AM for one week and followed by 40 mg AM and 40 mg PM for a total dose up to 160 mg daily
Other Names:
  • Dideral
Active Comparator: Venlafaxine
Venlafaxine up to 150 mg/day
Venlafaxine treatment was followed as: 37.5 mg qhs for two weeks and followed 75 mg qhs with an escalating dose with 2 weeks periods up to 150 mg daily
Other Names:
  • Efexor

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Dizziness Handicap Inventory
Time Frame: 4 months post randomization
4 months post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Beck Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: 4 months post randomization
4 months post randomization
Change from baseline in Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: 4 moths post randomization
4 moths post randomization
Change from baseline in dizziness related quality of life
Time Frame: 4 moths post randomization
Dizziness related quality of life score by visual analog scale
4 moths post randomization
Change number of vertiginous attack
Time Frame: 3 moths post randomization
Baseline of number of attacks were obtained 1 moths before randomization and months between 3 and 4 moths after randomization
3 moths post randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 30, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2015

Last Verified

January 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vestibular Migraine

Clinical Trials on Propranolol

3
Subscribe