The Effects of Dual Task Training in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

February 4, 2019 updated by: Jay Alberts, The Cleveland Clinic

The Effects of Dual Task Training on Motor and Non-Motor Function in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease

The primary aim of the proposed project is to characterize dual tasking (DT) deficits to improve motor, cognitive, and quality of life outcomes in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD). Phase 1 of the intervention will involve an in-depth gait analysis on 15 individuals with PD. This gait analysis will utilize the Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment (CAREN) system, a virtual reality system with a fully integrated 3-D motion capture system. The purpose of Phase 1 is to generalize characteristics of gait and postural control during specific DT conditions. Phase 2 (N=20) involves the clinical translation of these findings. This phase will involve creating a clinical intervention based on the objective information gathered the CAREN system. The intervention will take place 3x/week for a total of 8 weeks. Interventional groups will include: 1) DT clinical group (N=10) and 2) Single task group (N=10). Outcome measures will be used at the beginning and end of the intervention to assess the feasibility and efficacy of the intervention.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of idiopathic PD
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Ability to ambulate ≥ 300ft with or without an assistive device
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage 2-4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Undergone any surgical procedure for the treatment of PD, such as deep brain stimulation
  • Those who are considered to be high risk exercisers per American College of Sports Medicine exercise screening questionnaire
  • Musculoskeletal injury or neurological injury other than PD that would restrict physical activity
  • Inability to follow 2 step commands
  • Significant cognitive impairment as designated by ≥ 3 errors on the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Dual Task Group
This group will complete an exercise intervention that involves performing dual tasking activities (simultaneously performing 2 things at once). This group will exercise 3x/wk for 8 weeks.
Performing motor-motor or motor-cognitive tasks at the same time.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Single Task Group
This group will complete an exercise intervention that involves performing single task activities. The participant will perform motor tasks and cognitive tasks individually. This group will exercise 3x/wk for 8 weeks.
Performing motor or cognitive tasks alone.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Step Length During Gait
Time Frame: Phase 1: baseline; Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
The average distance from heel strike of the less affected leg to heel strike of the more affected leg. Higher values indicate a longer step length.
Phase 1: baseline; Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Walking Speed During Gait
Time Frame: Phase 1: baseline; Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Average self-selected walking speed without dual tasking.
Phase 1: baseline; Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2 Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Phase 1: baseline; Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
A functional endurance assessment, reporting total distance traveled over a 2 minute period. Higher values indicate better functional endurance.
Phase 1: baseline; Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders Questionnaire
Time Frame: Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Quality of life questionnaire. Reported here is T-Score for the Lower Extremity domain. A T-score of 50 is the mean of the reference population, with higher scores indicating a better outcome.
Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale
Time Frame: Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Balance questionnaire. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater balance confidence.
Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Trail Making Test
Time Frame: Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Cognitive task where the participant connects 25 dots in numerical order. Lower scores indicate better cognitive function. Reported here is total time to complete the task.
Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Reaction Time
Time Frame: Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks
Average time taken to react to a choice of two stimuli. Lower scores indicate better reaction time.
Phase 2: baseline, end of treatment (8 weeks), and end of treatment +4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 16, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 16, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 2, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease

Clinical Trials on Dual Task Group

3
Subscribe