Listen in: Developing and Testing a Therapy Application for Patients With Speech Comprehension Deficits After Stroke. (Listen-in)

May 1, 2018 updated by: University College, London

Listen-In: the Development and Testing of a Web-based Therapy Application for Patients With Impaired Speech Comprehension Caused by Stroke

The main aim is to develop and test the clinical efficacy of a novel, web based, rehabilitation application. Listen-In will provide an effective speech comprehension training tool that patients with aphasia can use to practice independently. This will free up therapists time to provide additional assessment, supervision and functional intervention in a highly cost effective manner.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The main aim is to develop and test the clinical efficacy of a novel, web based, rehabilitation application. Listen In will provide an effective speech comprehension training tool that patients can use to practice independently. This will free up SALT time to provide additional assessment, supervision and functional intervention in a highly cost effective manner.

Phase 1 (24 months. London, Newcastle, Cambridge): Development of Listen In, including diagnostic and therapeutic components, driven by patient user's feedback (alpha and beta testing). The intervention is detailed below and is based on current SALT practice. It will be adaptive, provide feedback and target auditory perception at many levels: the phonemic, lexical and sentence level processing of heard verbal stimuli, as well as auditory short term memory and nonverbal sound discrimination.

Phase 2 (12 months. London and Cambridge): A pilot, randomised, crossover, clinical trial of Listen-In in a group of aphasic patients in the chronic post-stroke period. A power calculation suggests that we will need 36 patents, 18 in each arm. The comparison will be standard SALT clinical care. The main outcome measure is a clinically relevant improvement on the comprehension of spoken language score of the Comprehensive Aphasia Test (Swinburn, 2004). Secondary outcomes include improvements in social activity and participation. The milestones for this phase will be: 50% recruitment into study and last patient, last visit.

Phase 3 (funded outside i4i grant) will be the rollout of the therapy application on the internet with a pragmatic trial of whether therapy gains can be made outside the confines of a clinical trial. The comparison will be on similar outcome measures as Phase 2 with a control test on sustained attention (internal control) that we predict will not improve with therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • any type of stroke but greater than 6 months post onset
  • evidence of receptive aphasia
  • English as their main language
  • able to give informed consent
  • age 18 years or above
  • no diagnosis of degenerative brain disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke less than 6 months post onset
  • No evidence of receptive aphasia
  • English not their main language
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Less than 18 years old
  • diagnosis of degenerative brain disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: trial arm
100 hours of therapy.
100 hours of Auditory comprehension therapy embedded within a computer game.
NO_INTERVENTION: Normal therapy arm
12 weeks of normal therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in auditory comprehension on the comprehensive aphasia test.
Time Frame: Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Investigation of improvement on a functionally relevant area of a widely used test of aphasia.
Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in functional communication
Time Frame: Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Using patient reported outcomes to look at functional communication changes.
Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Improvement in production of language
Time Frame: Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Investigation of improvement on a functionally relevant area of a widely used test of aphasia.
Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Performance on the Sustained attention to response task
Time Frame: Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Investigation of improvement on sustained attention using the SART.
Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Environmental sounds test
Time Frame: Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Investigation of improvement on the non verbal environmental sounds test.
Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Test of semantics
Time Frame: Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Investigation of improvement in semantics knowledge.
Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Improvement in written language comprehension
Time Frame: Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Investigation of improvement on a functionally relevant area of a widely used test of aphasia.
Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Improvement on auditory descrimination
Time Frame: Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks
Investigation of improvement on a test of auditory discrimination developed by Dr Holly Robson.
Measured over 36 weeks (0,12,24,36) weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alex Leff, PhD, UCL

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 16, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 12, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

Clinical Trials on Auditory comprehension therapy.

3
Subscribe