FALCON: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

March 6, 2019 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

Near-infrared Fluorescence Cholangiography Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (FALCON): a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Rationale: Several clinical feasibility studies have shown the potential benefit of near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) for enhanced and earlier biliary anatomy visualization during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the aim to reduce the number of vascular and biliary injuries. Although the incidence of injuries is low (0.7%), the impact on patients in terms of morbidity, quality of life and costs are dramatic. The Critical View of Safety (CVS) technique is regarded as the safety valve in conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). It is hypothesized that standard application of near-infrared fluorescence imaging during laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be useful to obtain establishment of CVS (at least 5 minutes) earlier and with more certainty regarding visualization when compared to conventional laparoscopic imaging alone.

Study design: A multicenter randomized controlled trial with two study arms. Patients scheduled for an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be recruited and randomized at the outpatient clinic (n = 308 total). One group will undergo near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy (NIRF-LC) and the other group will undergo conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC).

Compared with standard care, patients in the NIRF-LC group have to receive one preoperative intravenous injection of ICG. This is the only additional minimally invasive action for the patient. Initially, patients participating in this study will not benefit from the application of NIRFC during the surgical procedure. The administration of ICG and the modified laparoscope itself are not related with any kind of additional risk for the patient.

Despite the encouraging results from several (pre)clinical feasibility studies, wide clinical acceptance of the routine use of ICG fluorescence laparoscopy is still lacking due to the absence of reliable and validated clinical data. A randomized clinical study is desirable to assess the potential added value of the NIRF imaging technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Strong evidence in favor of routine implementation of this new imaging technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, will probably lead to worldwide routine application of the NIRF technique. Therewith long term sustainability of this research project is guaranteed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most commonly performed laparoscopic procedures in gastrointestinal surgery. Bile duct injury during this procedure is rare but constitutes a serious complication (0.3-0.7%) (Flum 2003, Fletcher 1999, Nuzzo 2005 and Waage 2005). Misidentification of the extra-hepatic bile duct anatomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the main cause of bile duct injury (Way 2006).

The Critical View of Safety (CVS) technique, which was first described by Strasberg in 1995 (Strasberg 2003) and recommended by the Dutch Guidelines and Best Practice for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lange 2006), was introduced to reduce the risk of bile duct injury. To establish CVS, two windows need to be created: one window between the cystic artery, cystic duct and gallbladder, another window between the cystic artery, gallbladder and liver. The CVS technique is especially aimed at mobilizing the gallbladder neck from the liver, in order to obtain a circumferential identification of the transition of the cystic duct into the gallbladder.

Intraoperative cholangiography has been advised to reduce the risk of bile duct injury (Flum 2003, Buddinhg 2011). However, this radiological imaging of the biliary tree is only used selectively, as the process takes time, radiation exposure is involved and additional equipment and manpower for the procedure are required. Therefore, worldwide consensus about implementation of intraoperative cholangiography is still lacking (Ford 2012).

Near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging after intravenous injection of indocyanine green (ICG) is a promising new technique for easier intraoperative recognition of the biliary anatomy. It may help improve the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Buddingh 2011, Agarwal 2009). ICG is cleared quickly and exclusively by the liver after intravenous administration. Neither radiological support nor additional intervention, such as opening the biliary tree, is required. The NIRF laparoscopy technique using ICG has been evaluated in various animal models (Figueiredo 2010, Figueiredo 2011, Tagaya 2010, Matsui 2010) and in open, laparoscopic, and single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Tagaya 2010, Ishazawa 2010, Ishazawa 2011 Aoki 2010). Promising results were presented for successful intraoperative identification of the common bile duct and the cystic duct, compared to conventional laparoscopic imaging. Another clinical study showed that the NIRFC technique provides significantly earlier identification of the extra-hepatic bile ducts during the CVS dissection phase: up to 10 minutes earlier identification of cystic duct and common bile duct could be obtained (Schols 2012). Real-time simultaneous imaging of the hepatic and cystic arteries can also be obtained (Ashitate 2011, Mitsuhashi 2008, Schols 2013).

Despite the encouraging results from these (pre)clinical feasibility studies, wide clinical acceptance of the routine use of ICG fluorescence laparoscopy is still lacking due to the absence of reliable clinical data. Therefore, a multicenter randomized clinical study is desirable to assess the potential added value of the fluorescence imaging technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy in order to perform a more safe procedure leading to a reduction in the vascular and bile duct injuries. This study will compare NIRF assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether earlier establishment of Critical View of Safety can be obtained using the NIRF laparoscopy technique during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This will shorten the operation time, and thereby reduce the cost of the procedure.

Study design: Multicenter randomized controlled trial. 308 patients will be included for randomization. All patients (age >18 years) scheduled for an elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and meeting the inclusion criteria will be suitable for inclusion. Patients will be included in at least 3 hospitals in The Netherlands: Maastricht University Medical Center+; Leiden University Medical Center; Catharina Hospital.

Treatment of subjects: All operations will be performed by a surgical resident, assisted by a surgeon or surgical resident with a track record of at least 50 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, or will be performed by a surgeon or surgical resident with that track record him/herself. In the CLC group conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed using conventional laparoscopic imaging systems. In the NIRF-LC group, using laparoscopic fluorescence imaging systems near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography technique will be conducted to assist during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To obtain fluorescence imaging of the biliary tract a contrast agent has to be administered. Directly after induction of anesthesia the fluorescent dye, indocyanine green (ICG), will be administered for intraoperative visualization of the extra-hepatic bile ducts with the NIR fluorescence laparoscope. Since many years ICG has been approved for commercial and clinical diagnostic use by the FDA.

Randomization: After inclusion in the study (i.e., after written informed consent is obtained) patients will be randomized to NIRF-LC or CLC group. Randomization will be performed centrally. Computerized treatment allocation will be conducted on the day of surgery. There will be no blinding of patients or surgeons.Stratification factor will be performed for participating center.The experience level of the surgical team will be recorded, but no stratification will take place for this factor, as due to the large volume of patients an even distribution of skill level over both randomization arms in expected. Experience is defined in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy as first surgeon.

Study procedures: The laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure itself will not be performed differently than usual. Next, there will not be any radiation involved for the patient. Neither are any psychological or psychiatric investigations involved. Patients are not asked to undergo additional testing after the surgical procedure, they are also not requested to fulfill any questionnaire.

The following procedures will be conducted during this study:

  • Preoperative (NIRF-LC group): Directly after induction of anesthesia 1ml (2,5mg/ml) indocyanine green will be administrated via intravenous injection, by the surgeon or surgical trainee (under supervision of the surgeon and the anesthesiologist).
  • Intraoperative (CLC and NIRF-LC group): Intraoperatively the PhD researcher / local researcher (to be appointed in each participating center) systematically whether the localization of the common bile duct, cystic duct and cystic artery can be identified at set time points, by both the conventional camera mode (CLC group) and fluorescence camera mode (NIRF-LC group). Also establishment of CVS is registered. For agreement on the identification of the aforementioned structures the attending surgeon is consulted. A structure is scored as 'identified' if its localization is confirmed with great certainty by the experienced surgeon. In case of the common bile duct this does explicitly not mean that it was surgically exposed, as this is contradictory to the CVS-technique. In accordance with regular care, all laparoscopic surgical procedures will be digitally recorded.
  • Postoperative qualitative video analysis (CLC and NIRF-LC group)

Performed by expert panel of 3 surgeons:

  • Is CVS actually established? (and: at what time is CVS established?)
  • Time until identification of the cystic duct, and time until identification of the transition of the cystic duct in the gallbladder during dissection of CVS;
  • Time until identification of the cystic artery, and time until identification of the transition of the cystic artery in the gallbladder during dissection of CVS; Postoperative quantitative fluorescence image analysis (NIRF-LC group): For objective assessment of the degree of fluorescence illumination in the extra-hepatic bile ducts and artery, OsiriX 5.5.1 Imaging Software will be used. The fluorescence images will be analyzed by determining target-to-background ratio (TBR). TBR is defined as the mean fluorescence intensity (FI) of two point regions of interest (ROIs) in the target (i.e. CBD, CD or CA) minus the mean fluorescence intensity of two background (BG) ROIs in the liver hilum, divided by the mean fluorescence intensity of the two background ROIs in the liver hilum; in formula: TBR = (FI of target - FI of BG) / FI of BG.

Postoperative registration of secondary endpoints (CLC and NIRF-LC group). The researcher will document the following remaining secondary endpoints: Intraoperative bile leakage from the gallbladder or cystic duct; Bile duct injury; Postoperative length of hospital stay; Complications due to the intravenously injected contrast agent; Conversion to open cholecystectomy; Postoperative complications (until 90 days after surgery) After 90 days the patient will contacted by telephone to register any complications that occurred after the routine visits.

Cost-effectiveness minimisation of the procedure will be calculated, limited to the per-operative period. The observed reduction in time until CVS, calculated in cost per minute use of the operating suite, will be weighed against the extra cost of the use of the equipment and the fluorescent dye.

Postoperative analysis of time measurements (CLC and NIRF-LC group) Regarding the primary and secondary endpoints, a linear regression analysis will be applied for determination of possible significant differences between the time measurements from "first look at liver hilum" until "establishment of CVS" / "identification of transition CD in gallbladder" / "identification of transition CA in gallbladder"; therewith comparing fluorescence laparoscopic imaging with conventional laparoscopic imaging. In case of missing values (which can occur with the expert panel analysis, when the panel concludes that actually no CVS was obtained or the transition of the mentioned structures in the gallbladder had not been properly identified) a Cox regression analysis will be used.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

308

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Limburg
      • Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229
        • Recruiting
        • Maastricht University Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Normal liver and renal function
  • No hypersensitivity for iodine or ICG
  • Able to understand nature of the study procedures
  • Willing to participate and with written informed consent
  • Physical Status Classification: ASA I / ASA II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Liver or renal insufficiency
  • Known iodine or ICG hypersensitivity
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Not able to understand nature of the study procedure
  • Physical Status Classification: ASA III and above
  • iv Heparin injection in the last 24 h; (LMWH not contraindicated)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NIRF-LC

This group of patients will undergo near-infrared fluorescence cholangiography assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy by use of a Laparoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System (Karl Storz), in combination with one intravenous injection of contrast agent ICG. The ICG is given directly after induction of anesthesia in a dose of 1 ml of 2,5 mg/ml solution.

Intraoperatively every 2-5 minutes (more often if desired by surgeon) camera is switched to ICG mode for fluorescence cholangiography, until CVS is established.

Registration of time until establishment of CVS, visualization of the individual structures as described as secondary endpoints, and total operation time will be done.

The complete procedure will be recorded on video.

The Laparoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System (incl. laparoscope, light source, light cable) will supply the needs for near-infrared fluorescence imaging with ICG. The hypothesis is that this device will help in visualizing the anatomical structures such as the common bile duct, which are hard to visualize in white light due to the surrounding tissues.
Indocyanine Green will be injected intravenously as a contrast agent for the use of the Laparoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System.
Other Names:
  • ICG
No Intervention: CLC

This group will undergo conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy as in standard practice with no other intervention.

Registration of time until establishment of CVS, visualization of the individual structures as described as secondary endpoints, and total operation time will be done.

The complete procedure will be recorded on video.

Postoperatively, as in the NIRF-LC arm, the videos will be analysed to determine whether CVS is actually established, is the transition of the cystic duct into the gallbladder visualized? Is transition of the cystic artery into the gallbladder visualized? Furthermore, cost-minimalisation will be calculated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time to identification of CVS
Time Frame: at time of surgery
change in time to identification of CVS
at time of surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
time until identification of the transition of the cystic duct in the gallbladder during dissection of CVS
Time Frame: at time of surgery
change in time to identification
at time of surgery
visualization of CVS and visualization of the transition of the cystic duct and cystic artery in the gallbladder
Time Frame: at time of surgery
Are these structures actually visualized?
at time of surgery
total surgical time
Time Frame: at time of surgery
change in duration of surgery
at time of surgery
intraoperative bile leakage from the gallbladder or cystic duct
Time Frame: at time of surgery
change in number of intraoperative bile leakage from the gallbladder or cystic duct
at time of surgery
bile duct injury
Time Frame: up to 90 days
change in number of bile duct injuries
up to 90 days
postoperative length of hospital stay
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1-2 days
change in length of hospital stay
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1-2 days
complications due to the injected contrast agent
Time Frame: at time of surgery
appearance of complications in intervention group
at time of surgery
conversion to open cholecystectomy
Time Frame: at time of surgery
change in number of conversions
at time of surgery
postoperative complications
Time Frame: up to 90 days
change in number of postoperative complications
up to 90 days
cost-minimisation: difference in costs between the treatment in both groups
Time Frame: up to 90 days
change in costs per patient
up to 90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laurents PS Stassen, MD, PhD, Maastricht UMC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

September 24, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2019

Last Verified

March 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Fluorescence Imaging System (Karl Storz)

3
Subscribe