Biomarkers in Predicting Treatment Response to Sirolimus and Chemotherapy in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

A Biomarker Validation Study to Establish Whether Serial Flow Cytometric Measurements Predict Clinical Response to Sirolimus and MEC (Mitoxantrone Etoposide Cytarabine) Treatment in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myelogenous Leukemia

This pilot phase II trial studies whether biomarkers (biological molecules) in bone marrow samples can predict treatment response to sirolimus and chemotherapy (mitoxantrone hydrochloride, etoposide, and cytarabine [MEC]) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that is likely to come back or spread (high-risk). Sirolimus inhibits or blocks the pathway that causes cancer cells to grow. Adding sirolimus to standard chemotherapy may help improve patient response. Studying samples of bone marrow from patients treated with sirolimus in the laboratory may help doctors learn whether sirolimus reverses or turns off that pathway and whether changes in biomarker levels can predict how well patients will respond to treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To test the association between biochemical response and clinical response.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To estimate complete response rate of sirolimus MEC in patients with high risk AML.

II. To estimate progression free survival in this patient population. III. To collect further information on the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of sirolimus in combination with MEC in patients with relapsed or refractory myeloid malignancies.

OUTLINE:

Patients undergo collection of bone marrow samples prior to sirolimus dosing on day 4 and within 1 week and no later than day 45 of hematologic recovery. Patients receive sirolimus orally (PO) on days 2-9 (loading dose on day 1 only), and standard MEC chemotherapy comprising mitoxantrone hydrochloride intravenously (IV) over 15 minutes, etoposide IV over 1 hour, and cytarabine IV over 1 hour every 24 hours on day 4-8.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 3 months for 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

39

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must have histologic evidence of high risk acute myeloid leukemia defined as one of the following:

    1. Primary refractory non-M3 AML

      • Residual leukemia after a minimum of 2 prior courses of chemotherapy (Same or different)
      • Evidence of leukemia recurrence after a nadir bone marrow biopsy demonstrates no evidence of residual leukemia.
      • Evidence of leukemia after induction therapy which, in the opinion of the investigator, would be appropriate for reinduction with sirolimus/MEC therapy.
    2. Relapsed non-M3 AML
    3. Previously untreated non-M3 AML age >60 with no evidence of favorable karyotype defined by presence of t(8;21)(q22;q22) [AML1-ETO], inv16(p13;q22), or t(16;16)(p13;q22) [CBFβ;MYH11] by cytogenetics, FISH, or RT-PCR
    4. Previously untreated secondary AML (from antecedent hematologic malignancy or following therapy with radiation or chemotherapy for another disease) with no evidence of favorable karyotype defined by presence of t(8;21)(q22;q22) [AML1-ETO], inv16(p13;q22), or t(16;16)(p13;q22) [CBFβ;MYH11] by cytogenetics, FISH, or RT-PCR
  2. Subjects must be ≥ 18 years of age.
  3. Subjects must have an ECOG performance status of 2 or less (see Appendix1).
  4. Subjects must have a life expectancy of at least 4 weeks.
  5. Subjects must be able to consume oral medication.
  6. Subjects must have recovered from the toxic effects of any prior chemotherapy to =< Grade 1 (except alopecia).
  7. Required initial laboratory values:

    1. Creatinine ≤ 2.0mg/dL
    2. total or direct bilirubin ≤ 1.5mg/dL; SGPT (ALT) ≤ 3xULN
    3. negative pregnancy test for women with child-bearing potential.
  8. Patients must be able to sign consent and be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan and laboratory testing.
  9. Subjects must have a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≥ 45%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with FAB M3 (t (15; 17) (q22; q21) [PML-RARα]) are not eligible.
  2. Subjects must not be receiving any chemotherapy agents (except Hydroxyurea).

    a) Intrathecal methotrexate and cytarabine are permissible.

  3. Subjects must not be receiving growth factors, except for erythropoietin.
  4. Subjects with a "currently active" second malignancy, other than non-melanoma skin cancers are not eligible.
  5. Subjects with uncontrolled high blood pressure, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within the past 6 months or serious uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia are not eligible.
  6. Subjects taking the following are not eligible:

    1. Carbamazepine (e.g., Tegretol)
    2. Rifabutin (e.g., Mycobutin) or
    3. Rifampin (e.g., Rifadin)
    4. Rifapentine (e.g., Priftin)
    5. St. John's wort
    6. Clarithromycin (e.g., Biaxin)
    7. Cyclosporine (e.g. Neoral or Sandimmune)
    8. Diltiazem (e.g., Cardizem)
    9. Erythromycin (e.g., Akne-Mycin, Ery-Tab)
    10. Itraconazole (e.g., Sporanox)
    11. Ketoconazole (e.g., Nizoral)
    12. Telithromycin (e.g., Ketek)
    13. Verapamil (e.g., Calan SR, Isoptin, Verelan)
    14. Voriconazole (e.g., VFEND)
    15. Tacrolimus (e.g. Prograf) Subjects taking fluconozole, voriconizole, itraconazole, posaconazole, and ketokonazole within 72 hours of study drug starting are not eligible. Reinstitution of fluconozole, voriconizole, itraconazole, posaconazole, ketokonazole and diltiazem is permissible 72 hours after the last dose of sirolimus.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sirolimus, MEC chemotherapy
Patients undergo collection of bone marrow samples prior to sirolimus dosing on day 4 and within 1 week and no later than day 45 of hematologic recovery. Patients receive sirolimus PO on days 2-9 (loading dose on day 1 only), and standard MEC chemotherapy comprising mitoxantrone hydrochloride IV over 15 minutes, etoposide IV over 1 hour, and cytarabine IV over 1 hour every 24 hours on day 4-8.
Given IV
Other Names:
  • VP-16
  • Etopophos
  • Etoposide phosphate
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Cytosar-U
  • Cytosine arabinoside
  • Depocyt
  • ara-C
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Novantrone
  • Mitoxantrone hydrochloride
Given PO
Other Names:
  • Rapamycin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biochemical response
Time Frame: Baseline to day 4
Defined by change in phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (pS6) positive blasts, measured as the % reduction in pS6 positive blasts from baseline to day 4. Biochemical response will be described by mean, median, standard deviation, range and coefficient of variation. The association between biochemical response and clinical response will be tested by Fisher's exact test.
Baseline to day 4
Clinical response
Time Frame: Day 45
Based on hematologic recovery/day 45 marrow assessed according to International Working Group (IWG) criteria. The association between biochemical response and clinical response will be tested by Fisher's exact test.
Day 45
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: Up to day 45
Recorded and graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Worse toxicity grades observed during treatment will be described. Toxicities will be graded and tabled.
Up to day 45

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall response rate (ORR) (complete response [CR], CR with incomplete platelet recovery [CRp], or partial response)
Time Frame: Day 45
Fraction of patients who achieve CR, CRp, or PR will be assessed. ORR and 95% exact confidence interval will be computed for all patients and for sensitive and resistant subgroups.
Day 45
Relapse free survival (RFS)
Time Frame: Time from study entry to first documented progression, death, or last contact, assessed up to 2 years
RFS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A landmark analysis of RFS by clinical response (CR+CRp, CRi, PR or no response [NR]) will be computed from day 45 marrow assessment. Median values and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated.
Time from study entry to first documented progression, death, or last contact, assessed up to 2 years
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Time from study entry to death or last contact, assessed up to 2 years
OS will be estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. A landmark analysis of RFS by clinical response (CR+CRp, CRi, PR or NR) will be computed from day 45 marrow assessment. Median values and 95% confidence intervals will be calculated.
Time from study entry to death or last contact, assessed up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Margaret Kasner, MD, Thomas Jefferson University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 7, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

May 17, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

October 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Recurrent Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Etoposide

3
Subscribe