Loop Diuretic Dosage in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Renal Failure: Conventional Versus Carbohydrate Antigen 125-guided Therapy (IMPROVE-HF) (IMPROVE-HF)

Worsening renal function (WRF) is a frequent finding in patients with decompensated acute heart failure (AHF) and it is associated to increased length of hospitalization and higher morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, WRF in AHF setting has been attributed to low cardiac output, but recent evidence also suggests venous congestion play a crucial role. Loop diuretics are the mainstay treatment of AHF, but their use traditionally has been associated to WRF, but also renal function improvement in patients with unequivocal signs of congestion. Nevertheless, traditional symptoms or signs of patients with AHF have shown a limited accuracy to neither identify nor quantify the degree of venous congestion. Recent authors have reported that plasma levels of antigen carbohydrate 125 (CA125) are closely related to the degree of venous congestion.

The investigators hypothesize that CA125 may have a role for identifying the hyperhydrated (High CA125) patients that need high loop diuretic doses, and those with normal CA125 values needing low loop diuretic doses. In this randomized study (1:1) the investigators seek to evaluate whether a CA125 loop diuretic guided management therapy is superior to a standard strategy. The primary endpoint is the magnitude of changes of renal function at 24 and 72 hours after initiation of intravenous diuretic in an acute worsening of heart failure

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

170

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
        • Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients with the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF) and the concurrence of the following conditions:

  1. Presence of symptoms (dyspnea at rest or minimal exertion) and signs attributable to congestion (signs of congestion on chest radiography, or presence of peripheral edema or ascites, or jugular venous distension at 45 degrees or presence of crackles on auscultation).
  2. Elevated natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP> 1000 pg/ml or BNP> 100 mg/dl).
  3. Creatinine ≥1,4 mg/dl on admission, provided that the estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml / min / m2.
  4. Intent to be treated with loop diuretics intravenously.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Life expectancy less than 6 months of life due to other comorbid conditions.
  2. Cardiogenic shock.
  3. Diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in the previous 30 days.
  4. Pregnancy at the time of inclusion.
  5. Restrictive or Obstructive pulmonary disease or severe degree.
  6. Chronic renal insufficiency in stage V (estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 ml / min / m2) or patient previously included in known dialysis program.
  7. Participation in another clinical trial randomized at the time of inclusion.
  8. Temperature ≥38 ° C or diagnosis of pneumonia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: CA125 guided strategy
In this group loop diuretic (Furosemide) dosage will be guided by Carbohydrate Antigen 125 (CA125) plasma levels
Initial dose of intravenous furosemide ≤80 mg / day regardless of prior dose of loop diuretics who were receiving.
Other Names:
  • Loop diuretic (Furosemide) dosage in CA125 ≤35 U/ml patients
Initial dose of intravenous furosemide ≥120 mg/day or 2.5 times the dose the patient was taking at home.
Other Names:
  • Loop diuretic dosage (Furosemide) in CA125 >35 U/ml patients
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional strategy
Standard treatment strategy Therapy is based on established european guidelines
The dosage of loop diuretics is done according to the presence of symptoms and signs of systemic congestion and current recommendations

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in renal function (GFR)
Time Frame: 24 and 72 hours
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by MDRD. Prespecified interim analysis of primary outcome will be made by protocol when first 100 patients are included.
24 and 72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in signs and symptoms of heart failure (NYHA)
Time Frame: 24 and 72 hours
Evaluation of dyspnea (changes in the functional class of the New York Heart Association -NYHA)
24 and 72 hours
Improvement in signs and symptoms of heart failure (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 and 72 hours
Evaluation of signs of systemic congestion, and patient global assessment (by visual analogue scale -VAS-)
24 and 72 hours
Changes in plasma levels of natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Changes in plasma levels of high sensitive troponin
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours
Time required to change intravenous diuretics to oral administration.
Time Frame: Through study completion (30-day follow-up)
Through study completion (30-day follow-up)
Composite of all-cause mortality plus acute heart failure related rehospitalization
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of events in each group during 30-day follow-up
30 days
Change in renal function (creatinin)
Time Frame: 24 h, 72 h and 30 days
Serum levels of creatinine
24 h, 72 h and 30 days
Change in renal function (urea)
Time Frame: 24 h, 72 h and 30 days
Serum levels of urea
24 h, 72 h and 30 days
Change in renal function (cystatin C)
Time Frame: 24 h, 72 h and 30 days
Serum levels of Cystatin C
24 h, 72 h and 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julio Nuñez, MD, PhD, Fundación para la Investigación del Hospital Clínico de Valencia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 30, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on CA125 guided strategy

3
Subscribe