Risk Stratification in Acute Care: The Meaning of suPAR Measurement in Triage (suPAR)

February 16, 2021 updated by: Martin Schultz, Herlev Hospital

Introduction of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activating Receptor in Acute Care as a Prognostic Biomarker to Strengthen Risk Stratification of Acutely Admitted Patients

Will clinical outcome for patients be improved if triage in Acute wards and Emergency rooms is supplemented with a prognostic biomarker?

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In a health care system where the general population is growing, more patients are living with chronic conditions and the hospitals are reducing beds and length of stay, it is crucial to perform safe and fast risk stratification of patients presenting in the Emergency departments. Risk stratification is currently performed with a combination of measurement of the vital signs and assessment of the primary complaint. The aim of the current study is to assess whether the supplement of biomarkers can improve the risk stratification in regard to mortality, readmissions and improve overall patient flow in the Emergency departments. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activating receptor (suPAR) is the soluble form of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR). uPAR is present on various immunological active cells, as well as endothelia and smooth muscle cells. It is believed that suPAR mirrors the inflammatory response in patients. Previous studies have shown a strong association with mortality and severity of disease in a broad variety of conditions (infection, hepatic-, renal-, cardiac- and lung disease) as well as a possible marker of disease development in the general population. These abilities indicate that suPAR although unspecific would be ideal to identify patients at high- and at low-risk. The aim is to target interventions and limited clinical focus where it is most beneficial. In unselected patients suPAR is one of the strongest prognostic biomarker available to date.

It is not known whether information on prognosis in the Emergency department can be used to prevent death, serious complications or reduce admissions and readmissions.

The purpose of the current study is to examine if introduction of the biomarker suPAR and education of doctors in the meaning of suPAR levels and association to disease, can reduce mortality, admissions and readmission in patients referred to the emergency rooms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Herlev, Denmark, 2730
        • Herlev Hospital, Department of Cardiology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting acutely to the Acute ward/Emergency department and have blood samples done which include both Hemoglobin, C reactive protein and Creatinine within 6 hours of registration within the study period. The study is carried out in 2 Hospitals in the Capital of Denmark.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients presenting in Pediatric, Gynecological or Obstetric units. Patients not being examined with blood samples.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Conventional
no suPAR measurement. Standard care.
Experimental: suPAR
suPAR measurement and education of doctors working in the Emergency department in the meaning of low or elevated levels of suPAR. Since suPAR is measured on all patients regardless of disease the investigators cannot define a single intervention. A possible intervention depends on the clinical situation.
The biomarker suPAR will be measured on all patients included in the study. Before the study period the doctors will receive information on suPAR. We want to study if the information provided by suPAR is useful in emergency medicine. Interventions depends on the clinical issue, as suPAR is an unspecific marker of disease. Usually a elevated suPAR level could result in more investigation e.g. diagnostic procedures or follow up, while a low suPAR could result in faster discharge.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 10 months after the inclusions period ends mortality data will be assessed
Time frame starts at the beginning of the index admission, defined as first admission in the study period. Patients will be followed using central registers.
10 months after the inclusions period ends mortality data will be assessed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 1 months after index admission mortality data will assessed
Mortality within 30 days
1 months after index admission mortality data will assessed
Number of Discharges From the Emergency Room Within 24 Hours
Time Frame: 24 hours
How many patients are discharged directly from the ED
24 hours
Number of Admissions to the Medical Ward
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of Participants with Admissions to the Medical War
30 days
Number of Patients With an Admission to the Intensive Care Unit
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of Participants with transfer to the ICU
30 days
Number of Patients With New Cancer Diagnosis in Control vs Intervention Groups
Time Frame: 10 months after inclusion period ends
10 months after inclusion period ends
Length of Stay During Admission.
Time Frame: 30 days
Length of stay in days during the admission
30 days
Number of Readmissions
Time Frame: 90 days
Patients will be followed using central registers. All new admissions within 90 days of the same patient is defined as readmissions.
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kasper K Iversen, MD, DMSci, Department of Cardiology, Herlev Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

December 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HerlevH01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Triage

Clinical Trials on suPAR measurement

3
Subscribe