Comparison of Different Meshes in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair

November 22, 2018 updated by: Dr. Dominic C.C. Foo, The University of Hong Kong

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Short Term Outcomes of Self-gripping (Progrip) Mesh With Fibrin Glue Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Inguinal Hernia Repair

The placement of mesh is important in hernia surgery as it helps to reduce recurrence, yet the method of fixation of mesh may cause pain after surgery. In laparoscopic hernia repair, surgeon uses different methods to fix the mesh in large hernia defects or bilateral inguinal hernias. Progrip is a special mesh developed by manufacturer that it can be self-gripped to tissue, as a result no fixation is required after placement. There are few data about Progrip in laparoscopic hernia repair. In this randomized controlled trial we would like to compare the use of Progrip with the "conventional" mesh in laparoscopic hernia repair. Surgery is performed in the usual manner; prior to placement of mesh, surgeon will get the randomization result for that particular patient: Progrip and non-Progrip group. No fixation is required for Progrip group, while fixation with fibrin glue is needed for non-Progrip group. Intraoperative data (e.g. mesh deployment time, operative time, etc) will be collected. Patients will be assessed in clinic at 2-week, 3-month, 6-month and 1-year interval after surgery. Additional visits may be arranged if considered necessary. At follow up patient will be seen by surgeon first to review the wound condition and to look for any recurrence; while other post-operative data including total analgesic usage (number of tablets), return to normal activities (days), return to work (days), pain score etc will be assessed and recorded by a trained nurse who is blinded to the treatment that patient received. Any hernia recurrence will be recorded and treated accordingly. Primary aim of this study is to look for any difference of the 2 groups in terms of postoperative pain and quality of life scores.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the common surgeries performed by general surgeon all over the world. Tension-free Lichtenstein repair is the most common technique used in open repair, while many surgeons perform laparoscopic hernia repair: total extraperitoneal repair (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP). Laparoscopic surgery is considered to reduce postoperative pain, the incidence of wound complications and time to return to activities of daily living. Both techniques are based on the principle of tension free repair and rely on mesh placement in the preperitoneal space to exclude the inguinal defect and reinforce the abdominal wall; the recurrence rate following tension-free hernia repair is reported to be low and in the range of 1-4%.

Chronic pain after an inguinal hernia repair is a well recognized complication, irrespective of technique. The incidence of chronic pain is estimated to be around 5-10%. Many factors contributed to the development of chronic pain, and one of the factors being the type of mesh fixation method. Common types of mesh fixation methods in laparoscopic hernia repair are traumatic fixation - the use of tacks (absorbable or non-absorbable) or atraumatic fixation, e.g. the use of fibrin glue; while some surgeons do not fix the mesh. No fixation is practiced by some surgeons in unilateral repair as some studies showed that there was no difference in recurrence rate and incidence of chronic pain between fixation or no fixation groups, yet in these studies hernia opening was small (<3cm) or not measured. It is generally agreed that fixation is indicated in large hernias (defect size >3cm), bilateral hernias and recurrent hernias in order to avoid early mesh dislocation and hernia recurrence.

Study has shown that the use of tacks caused more early postoperative pain. Manufacturers try to develop self-gripping mesh with the aim to reduce chronic pain. ProgripTM (Covidien) is a lightweight, self-gripping mesh composed of monofilament polyester and polylactic acid (PLA) microgrips indicated for inguinal hernia repair. The resorbable microgrips provide immediate adherence to surrounding muscle and adipose tissue during hernia surgery, as a result no fixation method is required. Studies have shown that ProgripTM is associated with less pain in the early recovery period when used in open Lichtenstein repair, yet there are few studies of ProgripTM in laparoscopic hernia repair.

In Hong Kong, TEP is the preferred approach for most surgeons who perform laparoscopic hernia surgery. In this trial, patients with inguinal hernia who is suitable for TEP are recruited. TEP will be performed in the usual manner. Surgeon will assess the size of hernia defect prior to mesh insertion. For patients with large hernia defect or bilateral inguinal hernia that required mesh fixation, they will be randomized in two groups: ProgripTM and non-ProgripTM group. For ProgripTM no addition fixation is necessary, while for non-ProgripTM fixation is indicated. As tacks are known to be associated with postoperative pain, fibrin glue is designated as the fixation method in non- ProgripTM group in this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Hong Kong
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Tung Wah Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age≥18
  • Unilateral inguinal hernia with large hernia defect size (>3cm)
  • Bilateral inguinal hernias
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score: 1-2
  • Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any prior surgery for ipsilateral inguinal hernia (i.e. recurrent inguinal hernia)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score: 3 or above
  • History of major abdominal surgery that may result in difficulty in development of preperitoneal space
  • Subject is pregnant or breast feeding
  • Any serious concomitant illness with short life expectancy
  • Subject who is not able to attend follow up postoperatively

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Progrip
The Progrip group is the intervention group. Patients will undergo laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia. The surgeon will use a self-gripping mesh to repair the hernia. No fixation is required for the mesh.
Procedure: Progrip
Self-fixating mesh
Active Comparator: Non-Progrip

The Non-Progrip group is the control group.

Operation is performed under general anesthesia. A standard three-trocar technique is used: one infra-umbilical camera trocar (1cm) and two 5mm trocars placed at midline between the umbilicus and pubic bone (or one at the side of inguinal hernia). A laparoscope is inserted to the preperitoneal space through the incision. The space is insufflated with carbon dioxide. Dissection is performed, hernia content (if any) is reduced.

A non self-gripping synthetic mesh is placed. Fibrin glue is used for fixation.
Procedure: Non-Progrip
Non self-fixating mesh with the use of glue

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Chronic pain
Time Frame: 3 months post surgery
Chronic pain after hernia surgery was defined as the presence of pain at rest at the groin area. The severity of pain will be measured by a linear analogue pain score sacle from 0 to 10. Score >= 1 indicate the presence of pain.
3 months post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mesh deployment time
Time Frame: 1 day
the time for mesh deployment during surgery
1 day
intraoperative complications
Time Frame: 1 day
intraoperative complications
1 day
hernia recurrence rate
Time Frame: 1 year
hernia recurrence rate
1 year
quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
quality of life scores
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

The University of Hong Kong

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dominic, Chi Chung Foo, MBBS, The University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

March 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UW 16-042

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hernia, Inguinal

Clinical Trials on Progrip

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Belarus

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe