Recovery of Physical Functioning After Hip Fracture (HIPFRAC)

April 14, 2021 updated by: Vestre Viken Hospital Trust

Recovery of Physical Functioning, Activity Level, and Quality of Life After Hip Fracture in the Fragile Elderly

The survivors after hip fracture often report severe pain and loss of physical functioning. The poor outcomes cause negative impact on the person's physical functioning and quality of life and put a financial burden on society. It is important to continue and progress the functional training that already started at the hospital, while the patients are transferred to short-term stays in a nursing home before they are returning to home. The aim presently is to examine the effects of a functional training program by a RCT design, initiated by the physiotherapist and performed by the nurses, on physical functioning while the patients are at short term stays in primary health care.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Functional training, such as walking and transfers, ought to be an important part of the rehabilitation after hip fracture. We have an assumption that it is of utmost importance to continue and progress the functional training that started in the acute phase at the hospital, also during the sub-acute phase while the patients are at short-term stays in nursing homes. However, there are indications of lack of resources in the nursing homes and that the nurses may be less concerned with their role and participation in the patients' rehabilitation process. Possibly, this creates a discontinuity in the rehabilitation efforts during short-term stays that may have a negative impact on the patients' recovery of physical functioning.

In this study the aim is to continue and progress the functional training started during hospital stay, such as training in walking and further on repetitive sit-to-stands, as part of the daily habitual routine during short-term stays in the nursing homes. This type of functional training may be motivational and easily recognizable to the patients, and it can also be carried out by the nursing staff with only initial guiding from a physiotherapist. There is lack of knowledge on the effect of additional functional training, incorporated as part of the habitual daily routine during short-term stays, on the patients' immediate and long term recovery of physical functioning and activity level after hip fracture, compared to usual care alone.

The study is designed as a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), comparing the effects of additional functional training (functional training group)to usual care alone (control group) during short-term stays in nursing homes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Drammen
      • Sandvika, Drammen, Norway, 3004
        • Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken, Department of medical research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an acute low-energy hip fracture (intracapsular, trochanteric or subtrochanteric) and treated surgically, ≥ 65 years of age, living in their own homes prior to the fracture, and able to give an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients unable to walk 10 meters with or without a walking aid prior to the fracture, have a score of less than 15 points on Minimal Mental Status Evaluation (MMS-E) in the acute phase, have a pathological fracture, life expectancies of less than three months, medical contraindications for training, or are incapable of understanding and speaking the Norwegian language.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Functional training group
Participation in a functional training program in addition to usual care. The functional training program is initiated by the nurses and consists of walking, sit-to-stands, balance training, weight transfer training, knee squats. The program is performed 4 times a day for 3 weeks while at short-term stays.
Patients treated for hip fracture participate in a functional training program during their short-term stays at nursing homes. The program is initiated by the nurses 4 times a day for 3 weeks as part of the habitual routine.
No Intervention: Control group
Usual care only. No participation in the functional training program while at short-term stays.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the performance-based Short physical performance battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Measurement of physical functioning
Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the performance-based measure Timed Up & Go (TUG)
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Measurement of mobility
Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Change in the performance-based measure Hand grip strength
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 12 months
Dynamometer
Change 5 days - 12 months
Descriptive performance-based measurement of physical activity, an accelerometer (activPAL)
Time Frame: Descriptive from day 5 to 19 after surgery
Measurement of physical activity
Descriptive from day 5 to 19 after surgery
Pain in rest and while walking
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Questionnaire
Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
EuroQol (European quality of life) health status measure
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Questionnaire
Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months
Questionnaire
Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months
New Mobility Scale (NMS)
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Questionnaire
Change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Walking Habits
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Questionnaire
Change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Fall efficacy scale (FES)
Time Frame: Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery
Questionnaire
Change 5 days - 3 weeks, change 5 days - 3 months, change 5 days - 12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Kristi E Heiberg, PhD, Bærum Hospital Vestre Viken HF

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 23, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Femoral Neck Fractures

Clinical Trials on Functional training program

3
Subscribe