Stimwave HF SCS Pilot Study (HFSCS)

June 7, 2017 updated by: Stimwave Technologies

Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study of High Frequency Wireless Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in the Treatment of Chronic Pain With The Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulatory

The purpose of this study is to observe the efficacy of stimulation on over all pain relief as reported in an initial cohort of 6 patients treated with the Freedom High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulator (SCS) System for low back and/or leg pain.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a non-blinded, short-term study for a maximum duration of 12 weeks in which 6 patients will receive a Freedom SCS System. Subjects will have chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or lower limbs refractory to standard medical treatment; including unilateral or bilateral pain. Stimulators will be placed in the epidural space and over exiting nerve roots at vertebrae levels:

A. Bilateral T9-T10 epidural; B. Bilateral L1-L4 epidural. All Patients will be treated below perception threshold with High Frequency settings (10.000 Hz, 30 μs).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West-Vlaanderen
      • Roeselare, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium, 8800
        • AZ Delta

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  1. Inclusion Criteria:

    A. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age at time of informed consent;

    B. Subjects have been diagnosed with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or lower limbs with a VAS > 5cm (on a 10-cm scale);

    C. Subject diagnosis with chronic pain refractory to conventional medical management for at least 6 months prior to enrollment;

    D. Based on the medical opinion of the Principal Investigator, there is no evidence of anatomic abnormalities that could jeopardize the placement of the device or pose a hazard to the subject;

    E. Subject is willing to undergo surgical implant procedure, attend visits as scheduled, and comply with the study requirements;

    F. Based on the opinion of the Principal Investigator, subject is willing and able to operate the patient programmer, recharging equipment, diary and has the ability to undergo study assessments and provide accurate responses;

    G. Based on the opinion of the implanter, subject is a good surgical candidate for the implant procedure;

    H. Subject is male or non-pregnant female;

    I. Subject is deemed to be neuro-psycho-socially appropriate for implantation therapies based of the assessment of the investigator, using face-to-face encounters and the psychological testing described in the measures;

    J. Patient is capable of giving informed consent;

    K. Patient lives within reasonable distance from the study site (circumference of 75 km).

  2. Exclusion Criteria:

A. Obvious mechanical instability related to pain (diagnosed by imaging taken within the past 6 months);

B. Malignancies;

C. Subject has post-herpetic neuralgia (shingles);

D. Subject has an active systemic infection or is immune-compromised.

E. Based on the medical opinion of the Principal Investigator the subject has other psychological conditions (e.g., psychosis, suicidal ideation, borderline personality disorder, somatization, narcissism), other health conditions (e.g., substance abuse, another chronic condition requiring the regular use of opioid medication), or other legal concerns that would preclude his/her enrollment in the study or potentially confound the results of the study;

F. Subject is currently enrolled in or plans to enroll in any concurrent drug and/or device study while participating in this study;

G. Insulin-dependent diabetic who is not controlled through diet and/or medication;

H. Bleeding complications or coagulopathy issues;

I. Pregnant/lactating or not using adequate birth control;

J. A life expectancy of less than one year;

K. Any active implanted device whether turned off or on;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HF DRG
HF DRG Implants
A needle is carefully inserted near the spinal cord. The stimulator is then slide through the needle to lay close to the spinal cord. The end of the stimulator is then sutured underneath the skin of the back.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Efficacy Outcome (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-implant
The primary outcome is defined as the percentage of subjects who respond (50% average or more pain relief for back and leg pain) to SCS therapy at the end of 12 weeks post-implant of the system as compared to baseline with no increase in medication. The primary outcome will be measured with the VAS (100 mm line).
12 weeks post-implant
Primary Safety Outcome (Adverse Events)
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-implant
Incidence and severity of device related adverse events during the study
12 weeks post-implant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-implant
Percentage change from baseline in VAS for back and leg pain
12 weeks post-implant
ODI
Time Frame: 12 weeks post-implant
Change from baseline in functionality using the ODI score
12 weeks post-implant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 30-00178

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on FBSS

Clinical Trials on Implant procedure, Freedom Spinal Cord Stimulation System

3
Subscribe