Patients With Incomplete Colonoscopy a Comparison of Colon Capsule Endoscopy and CT Colonography (CfC100)

September 7, 2021 updated by: Morten Kobaek-Larsen, Odense University Hospital

Can Colon Capsule Endoscopy Substitute CT Colonography in the Large Bowel Examination of Persons Whose Colonoscopy Was Incomplete?

A total of 8000 colonoscopies are performed on a yearly basis on the Funen Island. Between 5% and 10% of those are incomplete due to excessive pain, fixed colon loops, and other reasons. The current standard procedure is to refer the patient to the department of radiology for a CT-colonography. In some instances the radiology department can offer the investigation the next day, and thus in the same colon preparation. At other times they cannot, and the patient has to go through an second colon preparation for the colonography.

A CCE procedure could be provided to the participants immediately after the failed colonoscopy and the investigation can be completed the next morning in the same bowel preparation without a visit to the radiology department.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Optical colonoscopy is the standard method for evaluating the colon. This technique allows evaluation of the entire colon in most patients. Full colonoscopy including examination of the cecum is associated with an increased detection rate of advanced neoplasia, as 33-50% of advanced neoplasia is located in the proximal colon. After an incomplete optical colonoscopy, participants are required to undergo another test in order to exclude clinically relevant lesions to reduce the risk of proximal cancer which has been shown to increase by twofold when colonoscopy was incomplete.

Endoscopic and radiological options to complete the colon assessment have been available in the last decades. Multiple alternative endoscopic techniques-such as colonoscopy with thinner colonoscopes, gastroscopes and device-assisted enteroscopes have been described. However, none of them has been clearly standardized.

CT colonography (CTC), is a relatively new imaging technique that was first described in 1994. In large randomized trials on symptomatic patients, CTC has been shown to be as equally effective as colonoscopy - for the detection of large colorectal polyps and already developed colorectal cancer.

Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) is a promising new technology that may have the potential to complement existing diagnostic methods to screen people for colorectal cancer. Delivered correctly, it may reduce costs, increase utilization of medical services, reduce risks for patients and overall improve screening rates among the population.

A total of 8000 colonoscopies are performed on a yearly basis on the Funen Island and about 10% of those are incomplete due to excessive pain, fixed colon loops, and others causes. The current standard procedure is to refer the participant to the Department of Radiology for a CT-colonography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Svendborg, Denmark, 5700
        • Odense University Hospital, Svendborg Sygehus

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous gastrointestinal surgery except for appendectomy
  • Known inflammatory bowel disease including Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis
  • An ostomy
  • Diabetes
  • Symptoms on bowel obstruction
  • Pacemakers
  • Kidney diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CCE in incomplete Colonoscopies
Patients in which colonoscopy is not possible are invited for CT colonography and those patients are examined by Camera Capsule Endoscopy the day before the CT colonography and the two different examinations are compared.
When the initial colonoscopy has failed, participants are invited to ingest a CCE on the day prior to their subsequent CT colonography. Thus, the CCE and CT will be compared within subjects for their ability to identify and estimate sizes of polyps
Other Names:
  • PillCams2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of CCE compared to CTC
Time Frame: Up to 14 days for conducting both procedures
The sensitivity and specificity of CCE will be measured in terms of n of polyps detected by CCE compared to n of polyps detected by CTC
Up to 14 days for conducting both procedures

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Size estimation
Time Frame: Up to 14 days for conducting both procedures
Each polyp is estimated in terms of size through the use of both technologies
Up to 14 days for conducting both procedures
Polyp miss rate
Time Frame: Up to 30 days for conducting all three procedures
The rate of polyps missed by CCE and CTC respectively compared to a colonoscopy that will be performed in full sedation for participants in whom discrepancy is found between the two modalities (CCE and CTC)
Up to 30 days for conducting all three procedures

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gunnar Baatrup, Professor, Odense University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OdenseUH_MKL1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incomplete Colonoscopy

Clinical Trials on CCE in incomplete Colonoscopies

3
Subscribe