Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide in the Treatment of Hypothalamic Obesity After Craniopharyngioma Therapy (CRANIOEXE)

October 11, 2018 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Multicentre Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide in the Treatment of Hypothalamic Obesity After Craniopharyngioma Therapy

This hypothalamic obesity is associated with serious metabolic and psychosocial consequences.

The purpose of the study is to compare the change of body weight after 6 months treatment with a lifestyle intervention + exenatide compare to the one after the same lifestyle intervention+ placebo in adults patients suffering from a hypothalamic obesity due to treatment of craniopharyngioma.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The development of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues might be a solution since native GLP-1 suppresses appetite and energy intake in both normal weight and obese individuals as well as in people with type 2 diabetes and delays gastric emptying. The underlying mechanisms that mediate the effects of weight involve not only central regions like the hypothalamus and the solitary tractus nucleus and area postrema but also peripheral regions as the gastrointestinal tract. These extra hypothalamic effects are of particular interest in the cases of obesity due to hypothalamic lesions.

Exenatide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue with a high structural homology to human GLP-1, a gut derived incretin hormone. Since exenatide causes a dose-dependent weight loss, decreasing concentration of glycosylated haemoglobin as well as improving ß-cell function and systolic blood pressure, it could be an attractive treatment for both type 2 diabetes and obesity. In a double-blind placebo-controlled 24-week trial, it has been recently shown that non diabetic obese patients maintained on exenatide 10µg x 2/j lost significantly more weight than did those on placebo (5.1 kg versus 1.6).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Angers, France
        • CHU d'Angers
      • Brest, France
        • CHU de Brest
      • Grenoble, France
        • CHU de Grenoble
      • Lyon, France
        • Chu de Lyon
      • Marseille, France
        • APHM
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Cochin
      • Paris, France
        • Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Bicêtre
      • Paris, France
        • Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière (APHP)
      • Pessac, France
        • Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
      • Toulouse, France
        • CHU de Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • They are between 18 and 75 yrs.
  • They had been diagnosed with a craniopharyngioma treated by surgery and/or irradiation without sign of recurrence.
  • They have a BMI upper than 30kg/m² with intractable weight gain following therapy for craniopharyngioma.
  • They demonstrate at least one other endocrinopathy, as a marker of hypothalamic damage.
  • All pituitary deficiencies are correctly treated.
  • They gave their written, informed consent before the beginning of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • They have type 1 diabetes.
  • They have type 2 diabetes treated with insulin.
  • Acidocetosis.
  • Bariatric surgery
  • Previous personal history of thyroid or pancreatic cancer.
  • Hypercalcitoninemia.
  • They have been previously treated by GLP1 analogs.
  • Hypertriglyceridemia upper than 5g/l
  • They had previously demonstrated voluntary weight loss during the three previous months.
  • They are under the age of 18 years or over the age of 65 yrs.
  • They are maintained on medical treatment against obesity.
  • They are receiving supraphysiologic hydrocortisone therapy (upper than 30 mg/jour).
  • Their GH status change during the course of the study.
  • Exenatide is contraindicated.
  • Psychological and/or medical problems that would create difficulties for the patient to comply with the study protocol are present.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Exenatide
Treatment with exenatide at the initial dose of 5 µg x 2/day (subcutaneously administered) during 4 weeks, and treatment with 10 µg x 2/day during 5 months.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Patients will be maintained on placebo (injected subcutaneously, twice a day) with the same dose and frequency than exenatide arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare body weight change thanks to weighing machine
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
The primary outcome will be assessed by a weighing machine that measure until 200 kg.
baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment tolerance thanks to digestive parameters
Time Frame: 6 months

Tolerance will be assessed by the presence of:

- Nauseas, vomiting.

6 months
Treatment tolerance thanks to dermatologic parameter
Time Frame: 6 months

Tolerance will be assessed by the presence of:

- Injection-site symptoms.

6 months
Treatment tolerance thanks to pulse rate
Time Frame: 6 months

Tolerance will be assessed by the presence of :

- Increasing of pulse rate.

6 months
Treatment tolerance thanks to Beck scale
Time Frame: 6 months

Tolerance will be assessed by the presence of :

- Anxiety by Beck scale.

6 months
Treatment tolerance thanks to HAD scale
Time Frame: 6 months

Tolerance will be assessed by the presence of :

- depression evaluated by HAD scale.

6 months
Treatment tolerance thanks to enzymatic parameters
Time Frame: 6 months

Tolerance will be assessed by the presence of :

- Increasing of pancreatic enzymes.

6 months
Treatment tolerance thanks to glycemia parameter
Time Frame: 6 months

Tolerance will be assessed by the presence of :

- Hypoglycaemia

6 months
Assess cardiovascular risks thanks to glucose profil
Time Frame: 6 months
Levels of blood glucose and insulin, oral glucose tolerance testing, haemoglobin A1C
6 months
Assess cardiovascular risks thanks to lipid profil
Time Frame: 6 months
Levels of HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol.
6 months
Assess cardiovascular risks thanks to metabolic parameters
Time Frame: 6 months

The metabolic parameters considered:

- Body composition (Dual energy-ray absorptiometry) and abdominal obesity (waist circumference).

6 months
Assess eating behaviour thanks to physiological parameters
Time Frame: 6 months

The eating behaviour will be evaluated by:

- Plasma level of ghrelin measured after an overnight fast.

6 months
Assess eating behaviour thanks to energy intake
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Assess eating behaviour thanks to Three factor eating
Time Frame: 6 months

The eating behaviour will be evaluated by:

- Scores of restriction, hunger and disinhibition (French version of the Three factor Eating Questionnaire).

6 months
Assess eating behaviour thanks to visual analogic scales
Time Frame: 6 months

The eating behaviour will be evaluated by:

- Scores of desire to eat, hunger and fullness at visual analogic scales.

6 months
Assess quality of life thanks to Beck questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months

The quality of life will be assessed by:

- Scores of depression (short questionnaire of Beck).

6 months
Assess quality of life thanks to ORWELL questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months

The quality of life will be assessed by:

- Scores of quality of life (ORWELL questionnaire).

6 months
Assess energy expenditure thanks to physical activity
Time Frame: 6 months

The energy expenditure will be estimated thanks to pedometer.

- Resting metabolic rate (indirect calorimetry).

6 months
Assess energy expenditure thanks to indirect calorimetry
Time Frame: 6 months

The energy expenditure will be estimated thanks to:

- Resting metabolic rate

6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Blandine Gatta-Cherifi, Pr, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 11, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 30, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 9, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypothalamic Obesity

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe