- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02880085
Marker for FAI Diagnosis (MarkerFAI)
Use of a Marker for Cartilage Damage to Differentiate the Diagnosis of Femural Acetabular Impingement From Extraarticular Pathologies.
The diagnostic gold standard to differentiate FAI (femural acetabular impingement) from other muscular-tendinous pathologies is, actually, the injection of intra-articular anesthetic (lidocaine), with a pre- and post- evaluation of pain scale.
If, after injection, the pain disappears, the pain is probably due to an articular problem (FAI). This kind of differential diagnosis test has a sensibility of 100% and a specificity of 81%.
C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (CTXII) as cartilage degradation index, could be a marker, simply detectable, to assess the healthy of the cartilage status and could be measured in serum and urine.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is observational-analytical and cross-sectional, because the same patient will receive both the diagnostic iter.
For the rules of Evidence-based Medicine (Brown et al., 2006), the definition of this study PICO is:
P (population)= all the patients with suspected FAI afferent to Orthopaedic-Traumatology and Prosthetic surgery and revisions of hip and knee implants
I (intervention)= enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (CTXII) in serum and urine
C (comparison)= intra-articular lidocaine injection
O (outcome)= sensibility/specificity of ELISA test
From a literature analysis the C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (CTXII) seem to be the best candidate for this kind of comparison. Some previous studies (Scarpellini et al, 2008) demonstrated that this marker could be used in this way, and, for this reason, the aim of this study is to investigate the sensibility and specificity of this marker in serum and urine, vs the actual diagnostic gold standard (anesthetic intra-articular injection).
If the marker will be equal or better than the actual gold standard, the clinical practice will have an improvement, because this kind of analysis is simply performing and less invasive for the patient.
The study will enroll 20 patients with suspected FAI between 18-45 years and of both the gender.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Bologna, Italy, 40136
- Laboratorio Tecnologia Medica
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with clinical diagnosis of suspected FAI
- Patients with clinical addressing to arthroscopy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients referring articular rheumatic pathologies
- Patients referring traumatic events in hip
- Patients wearing other hip prosthesis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of partecipants with positive FAI by diagnostic gold standard (anesthetic injection) and negative response of FAI by dosing markers.
Time Frame: 1 year
|
It will be valuated with ROCC curve of both the diagnostic protocols.
The Diagnostic Gold standard (anesthetic injection) ascertains the presence of FAI when, after anesthetic injection, the measured pain considerably decreases or disappears, using tha VAS scale for pain.
If the dosage of the markers will be higher of the assessed normal values in the cases of diagnosed FAI, with a higher or equal sensitivity and specificity (%), it will be demonstrated that this kind of diagnosis could be a good subtituite of the actual diagnostic gold standard (valuated with ROCC curve)
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC. Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jul;88(7):1448-57. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02806.
- Kelly BT, Buly RL. Hip arthroscopy update. HSS J. 2005 Sep;1(1):40-8. doi: 10.1007/s11420-005-0105-3.
- Mintz DN, Hooper T, Connell D, Buly R, Padgett DE, Potter HG. Magnetic resonance imaging of the hip: detection of labral and chondral abnormalities using noncontrast imaging. Arthroscopy. 2005 Apr;21(4):385-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.12.011.
- Philippon MJ, Maxwell RB, Johnston TL, Schenker M, Briggs KK. Clinical presentation of femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Aug;15(8):1041-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-007-0348-2. Epub 2007 May 12.
- Simpson J, Sadri H, Villar R. Hip arthroscopy technique and complications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Dec;96(8 Suppl):S68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pathologic Processes
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Femoracetabular Impingement
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Anesthetics
- Lidocaine
- Anesthetics, Local
Other Study ID Numbers
- 07/15
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Femoroacetabular Impingement
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteCompleted
-
Schulthess KlinikCompletedSymptomatic Femoroacetabular ImpingementSwitzerland
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteCompletedFemoroacetabular Hip Impingement SyndromeCanada
-
Ramsay Générale de SantéRamsay santéRecruiting
-
Horsens HospitalUniversity of Aarhus; La Trobe UniversityNot yet recruitingFemoroacetabular Impingement
-
American Hip InstituteStryker OrthopaedicsRecruitingFemoroacetabular ImpingementUnited States
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)RecruitingFemoroacetabular ImpingementUnited States
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenActive, not recruitingFemoroacetabular ImpingementBelgium
-
McMaster UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); McMaster Surgical Association; Arthroscopy Association of North America and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingFemoroacetabular ImpingementCanada, Netherlands, Korea, Republic of
-
The Hawkins FoundationTerminated
Clinical Trials on Local anesthetic
-
Lithuanian University of Health SciencesUnknownPrimary Total Knee ArthroplastyLithuania
-
Aretaieion University HospitalKAT General HospitalActive, not recruitingPain, Postoperative | Analgesia | Pain, Acute | Ketamine | Pain, Chronic | Morphine | Pain, NeuropathicGreece
-
Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteUnknown
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesRecruitingChronic Plantar FasciitisUnited States
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkCompletedInterscalene Block | Shoulder ArthroscopyUnited States
-
Hôpital du ValaisUniversity of Lausanne HospitalsCompleted
-
University of SaskatchewanCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | Carpal TunnelCanada
-
Karlstad Central HospitalCompleted
-
University of California, San DiegoTeleflex; Summit Medical Products, Inc.CompletedPostoperative Pain Following Knee ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Ajou University School of MedicineRecruiting