Marker for FAI Diagnosis (MarkerFAI)

August 22, 2016 updated by: Enrico Tassinari, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli

Use of a Marker for Cartilage Damage to Differentiate the Diagnosis of Femural Acetabular Impingement From Extraarticular Pathologies.

The diagnostic gold standard to differentiate FAI (femural acetabular impingement) from other muscular-tendinous pathologies is, actually, the injection of intra-articular anesthetic (lidocaine), with a pre- and post- evaluation of pain scale.

If, after injection, the pain disappears, the pain is probably due to an articular problem (FAI). This kind of differential diagnosis test has a sensibility of 100% and a specificity of 81%.

C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (CTXII) as cartilage degradation index, could be a marker, simply detectable, to assess the healthy of the cartilage status and could be measured in serum and urine.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This study is observational-analytical and cross-sectional, because the same patient will receive both the diagnostic iter.

For the rules of Evidence-based Medicine (Brown et al., 2006), the definition of this study PICO is:

P (population)= all the patients with suspected FAI afferent to Orthopaedic-Traumatology and Prosthetic surgery and revisions of hip and knee implants

I (intervention)= enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (CTXII) in serum and urine

C (comparison)= intra-articular lidocaine injection

O (outcome)= sensibility/specificity of ELISA test

From a literature analysis the C-terminal telopeptide of type II collagen (CTXII) seem to be the best candidate for this kind of comparison. Some previous studies (Scarpellini et al, 2008) demonstrated that this marker could be used in this way, and, for this reason, the aim of this study is to investigate the sensibility and specificity of this marker in serum and urine, vs the actual diagnostic gold standard (anesthetic intra-articular injection).

If the marker will be equal or better than the actual gold standard, the clinical practice will have an improvement, because this kind of analysis is simply performing and less invasive for the patient.

The study will enroll 20 patients with suspected FAI between 18-45 years and of both the gender.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40136
        • Laboratorio Tecnologia Medica

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

20 male and female, age range 18-45 recovered for suspicious FAI

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with clinical diagnosis of suspected FAI
  • Patients with clinical addressing to arthroscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients referring articular rheumatic pathologies
  • Patients referring traumatic events in hip
  • Patients wearing other hip prosthesis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of partecipants with positive FAI by diagnostic gold standard (anesthetic injection) and negative response of FAI by dosing markers.
Time Frame: 1 year
It will be valuated with ROCC curve of both the diagnostic protocols. The Diagnostic Gold standard (anesthetic injection) ascertains the presence of FAI when, after anesthetic injection, the measured pain considerably decreases or disappears, using tha VAS scale for pain. If the dosage of the markers will be higher of the assessed normal values in the cases of diagnosed FAI, with a higher or equal sensitivity and specificity (%), it will be demonstrated that this kind of diagnosis could be a good subtituite of the actual diagnostic gold standard (valuated with ROCC curve)
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 26, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Femoroacetabular Impingement

Clinical Trials on Local anesthetic

3
Subscribe