Stress Management Training for Healthy Aging

February 12, 2024 updated by: David Creswell, Carnegie Mellon University
This study is a two-arm randomized controlled trial comparing two 8-week stress management programs for reducing inflammation and improving well-being among older adults.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A growing body of literature has demonstrated how stress can affect social relationships, health, and well-being during the aging process. Here, the investigators will test how two different programs can be used to facilitate healthy aging by helping individuals manage stress. One program will teach participants mindfulness meditation techniques while the other will educate participants about how to manage their health.

N=188 older adults will visit the study's central laboratory for a baseline visit and complete several days of daily experience sampling before being randomized into one of the two 8-week stress management programs. Participants will complete several days of daily experience sampling at the midpoint and conclusion of the intervention before returning to a study site to complete a follow-up assessment at both 1-week and 3-months after the end of the program.

This project will provide important information about how each training program can be used to promote well-being, health, and better social functioning in older adults. This work will ultimately inform the design of more efficacious and efficient stress-management interventions to facilitate healthy aging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

190

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • Carnegie Mellon University
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center- Center for Integrative Medicine
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23284
        • Virginia Commonwealth University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years to 93 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • [Exclusion criteria are masked from public viewing until data collection is complete. Please contact project managers.]

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Mindfulness Training
The Mindfulness Meditation Program consists of eight weekly 2- 2.5 hour group sessions, a day-long retreat in the sixth week, and daily mindfulness meditation homework.
Guided mindfulness meditation and stress management training
Active Comparator: Health Education
The Health Education Program also consists of eight weekly 2- 2.5 hour group sessions, a day-long retreat in the sixth week, and daily health practice homework
Guided health education and stress management training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Circulating markers of inflammation, Interleukin-6 and C Reactive Protein
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Measured via blood samples
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pro-inflammatory gene expression
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention
Self-reported relational distress
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Evaluated using ecological momentary assessment
Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Self-reported loneliness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using UCLA loneliness scale and ecological momentary assessment
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health practices
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated by questionnaires asking about diet, caffeine consumption, alcohol use, stress reduction, exercise, recreational drug use, cold or flu, flu shots
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Mental health
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Beck Depression Inventory
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Self-reported stress
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Mindfulness
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Mindful Attention Awareness Scale
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Connectedness to nature
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Nature Connection Scale
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Personality
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using NEO Personality Inventory
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Social network and social support
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Social Network Index and Interpersonal Support Evaluation List
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Self-reported psychological distress
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Trait affect
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Stanford Measure of Actual, Ideal, and Avoided Affect
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Trait hostility
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Cook-Medley Hostility Scale
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Attachment style
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Adult Attachment Scale
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Attitudes towards aging
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Evaluated using Attitudes to Aging Questionnaire
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Resting thought listing
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up
Participants will sit quietly for 5 minutes and report all noticed experiences and reactivity to those experiences
Assessed at baseline, 1-week post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up
Immune functioning
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Assessed via stimulated IL-6 production and glucocorticoid resistance
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Cellular aging
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Assessed via telomeres and telomerase
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow-up
Markers of inflammation
Time Frame: Assessed at 3-month follow-up only
Assessed via hair sample
Assessed at 3-month follow-up only
Social interaction quality and quantity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Assessed via ecological momentary assessment
Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Self-reported psychological distress
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Assessed via ecological momentary assessment
Change from Baseline to Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Home practice quality and quantity
Time Frame: Assessed daily throughout the eight-week intervention period
Assessed by self-reported practice length, enjoyment of practice, usefulness of practice, trouble concentrating, mental fatigue, stress, and irritation during practice.
Assessed daily throughout the eight-week intervention period
Treatment expectations
Time Frame: Assessed prior to beginning of intervention, during Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Assessed by optimism about treatment and expectations for treatment outcome,
Assessed prior to beginning of intervention, during Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Instructor and class ratings
Time Frame: Assessed prior to beginning of intervention, during Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Assessed by self-report ratings of patient-provider connection
Assessed prior to beginning of intervention, during Intervention Weeks 4 and 8
Sleep measures
Time Frame: Change from baseline through intervention to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up
Assessed by self-report ratings of sleep using Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Change from baseline through intervention to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up
Physiological data (blood pressure, pulse rate)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up
Assessed by blood pressure cuffs in lab
Change from baseline to 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up
Physiological data (gait)
Time Frame: 1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up
Assessed by speed of walking at a normal pace
1-week post-intervention and 3-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Rebecca Pawlikowsky, BA, Office of Sponsored Projects, Carnegie Mellon University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

September 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1R01AT008685-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Loneliness

Clinical Trials on Mindfulness Training

3
Subscribe