ACURATE Neo™ TA Delivery System in Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis

February 22, 2023 updated by: Symetis SA

ACURATE Neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis for Implantation Using the ACURATE Neo™ TA Transapical Delivery System in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

The purpose of this investigation is to collect data pertaining to the safety and performance of the ACURATE neo (TM) Aortic Bioprosthesis as implanted with the ACURATE neo (TM) TA Transapical Delivery System. This device is intended for treatment of subjects with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who have high risk for conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery. The ACURATE neo (TM) Aortic Bioprosthesis is intended for use via minimally-invasive transapical implantation in a well-defined population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This is a single arm, prospective, multicenter non randomised and open trial of the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis where conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) via open heart surgery is considered to be high risk. All patients will be followed up to 5 years after the intervention.

The primary objective is to evaluate the safety and performance of the study device in patients presenting with severe aortic stenosis considered to be high risk for surgery Secondary objective is to evaluate adverse events and study device performance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bad Nauheim, Germany, 61231
        • Kerckhoff-Klinik
      • Bad Oeynhausen, Germany, 32545
        • Krankenhausbetriebsgesellschaft
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Deutsched Herzzentrum Berlin
      • Halle (Saale), Germany, 06112
        • Martin Luther University Halle Winttenberg
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Universitätklinikum Hamburg Eppendorf
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04289
        • Herzentrum Leipzig GmbH
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93053
        • University Hospital Regensburg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject must be at least 18 years old
  2. Severe aortic stenosis defined as:

    • Mean aortic gradient > 40 mmHg or
    • Peak jet velocity > 4.0 m/s or
    • Aortic valve area of < 0.8 cm2
  3. High risk patient determined by a multidisciplinary heart team consensus (cardiologist and cardiac surgeon) that patient is not a surgical candidate for conventional AVR due to risk factors such as STS Score (8% or higher) or other co-morbid conditions unrelated to aortic stenosis such as severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chest deformities and irradiated mediastinum
  4. NYHA Functional Class > II
  5. Multidisciplinary heart team (cardiologist and cardiac surgeon) consensus that the transapical approach is the most suitable access route for TAVI due to the presence of the following anatomic conditions:

    • porcelain aorta or
    • severely calcified or highly tortuous peripheral vasculature not appropriate for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation or
    • vessels too small for retrograde approach or
    • other anatomical conditions making transapical approach more suitable
  6. Aortic annulus diameter from ≥ 21mm up to ≤ 27mm by CT or TEE
  7. Patient willing to participate in the study and provides signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve or non-calcified
  2. Extreme eccentricity of calcification
  3. Severe mitral regurgitation (> Grade 3)
  4. Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve in any position and / or prosthetic ring
  5. LV apex is not accessible via transapical access due to severe chest deformity
  6. Previous surgery of the LV using a patch, such as the Dor procedure
  7. Presence of apical LV thrombus
  8. Calcified pericardium
  9. Septal hypertrophy unacceptable for transapical procedure
  10. Transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) is contraindicated
  11. ECHO evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
  12. LVEF < 20% by ECHO
  13. Need for emergency intervention for any reason within 30 Days of scheduled procedure
  14. Any percutaneous intervention, except for balloon valvuloplasty (BAV) within 1 month prior to implant procedure
  15. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization within 30 days before or after the study procedure
  16. Acute myocardial infarction within 1 month prior to implant procedure
  17. Previous TIA or stroke within 6 months prior to implant procedure
  18. Active gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 3 months prior to implant procedure
  19. Scheduled surgical or percutaneous procedure to be performed prior to 30 day visit
  20. History of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, refusal of blood transfusions or severe anemia (Hb<8 g/dL)
  21. Systolic pressure <80mmHg, cardiogenic shock, need for inotropic support or IABP
  22. Primary hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM)
  23. Active infection or endocarditis
  24. Hepatic failure (> Child B)
  25. Chronic renal dysfunction with serum creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL or renal dialysis
  26. Neurological disease severely affecting ambulation, daily functioning, or dementia
  27. Life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiac co-morbid conditions
  28. Intolerance to aspirin, clopidogrel, contrast media, or porcine tissue and allergy to nickel
  29. Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  30. For other severe illnesses of the patient (e.g. active carcinoma), the investigator shall decide on an individual basis whether the patient is not to be included in the study
  31. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System
Patients implanted with ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE neo™ TA Transapical Delivery System
ACURATE neo™ Aortic Bioprosthesis and ACURATE neo™TA Transapical Delivery System on patients with severe aortic stenosis where conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) via open-heart surgery is considered to be high risk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Safety: freedom from all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 6 months post procedure
freedom from all-cause mortality
6 months post procedure
Primary Device Performance:Procedure success in absence of MACCE
Time Frame: 30 days post procedure
Procedure success in absence of MACCE
30 days post procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of clinical endpoints according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC 2) guidelines
Time Frame: 30 Days and month 12
VARC 2 guidelines include different safety and efficacy endpoints like mortality, MI, stroke, etc.
30 Days and month 12
Incidence of all cause mortality at 30 Days and 12 Months
Time Frame: 30 days and 12 months
Incidence of all cause mortality at 30 Days and 12 Months
30 days and 12 months
Freedom from MACCE at 30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
Time Frame: 30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
Freedom from MACCE at 30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
30 Days, 6 Months and 12 Months
Number of patients who have a Procedural success defined by a combination of criteria
Time Frame: procedure
Procedural success defined as ACURATE neo™ at intended location with
procedure
Rate of device success
Time Frame: 7 days/ Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months and at 12 Months
Rate of device success
7 days/ Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months and at 12 Months
NYHA Functional Classification improvement
Time Frame: 30 Days, 6 Month and at 12 Months
NYHA Functional Classification improvement
30 Days, 6 Month and at 12 Months
Echocardiographic assessment of valve performance (at 7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months) using a combination of measures
Time Frame: 7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months
Echocardiographic assessment of valve performance (at 7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months) using a combination of measures
7 Days or Discharge, 30 Days, 6 Months, 12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Markus Pr Schönburg, Prof.Dr.Med, Abteilung Herzchirurgie Kerckhoff-Klinik

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 17, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 3, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The data and study protocol for this clinical trial may be made available to other researchers in accordance with the Boston Scientific Data Sharing Policy (http://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/data-sharing-requests.html).

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on ACURATE neo™TA Delivery System

3
Subscribe