Implant-Abutment Interface Design on Bone and Soft Tissue Levels Around Implants Placed Using Different Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation

March 6, 2021 updated by: Ismael Khouly, NYU College of Dentistry

Evaluation of Implant-Abutment Interface Design on Bone and Soft Tissue Levels Around Implants Placed Using Two Different Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation Approaches: A Multi-Center, Double Blind, Randomized Trial

Sixty patients with partially edentulous posterior maxilla requiring a transcrestal sinus floor elevation technique to insert one implant will be selected. The purpose of this multi-center, prospective, double blind, and randomized investigation is to analyze a platform switched implant when placed at limited maxillary residual bone height with low bone density compared to a platform matching implant with or without bone graft material.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Approximately 60 subjects who require at least one posterior maxilla implant in the areas of the second pre-molars or (first or second) molars with 6 to 9 mm of crestal bone below the sinus floor, as determined on the computerized axial tomographic (CT) scan, will be recruited for the study. Subjects will receive dental implants to replace a missing tooth (second pre-molar or first/second molar) on one side of the maxillary arch. Each subject will receive one type of implant: platform switched (PS) or platform matching (PM). Each site will receive either a bone graft material composed of anorganic bovine bone mineralized (ABBM, Bio-Oss, Geistlich Pharma) or no graft material (collagen membrane used for wound healing (Collatape, Zimmer)). At implant placement surgery and post-surgical follow-ups, the treated site will be examined, clinically measured, and radiographs and photographs will be taken.

The central hypothesis is that the mean crestal bone level for the platform switched (test implants) implants will be superior to the mean crestal bone level for the platform matching (control implants) implants when placed in limited maxillary residual bone in the posterior regions, regardless of the use of bone graft material or collagen membrane.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10010
        • Bluestone Center for Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects must have read, understood and signed an informed consent form.
  2. Subjects must be 18 to 70 years of age.
  3. Subjects must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions.
  4. Subject must maintain good oral hygiene.
  5. Subjects must have a single tooth missing in the pre-molar or molar region of the maxilla (ADA tooth positions 2-4 and 13-15; FDI tooth positions 15-17 and 25-27).
  6. The mesio-distal distance of the tooth gap at bone level must be at least 6.8 mm to allow for placement of the Ø3.8 mm implant with a minimal distance of 1.5 mm from the implant shoulder to the adjacent tooth at bone level. A minimum of 7.8 mm of buccal-lingual ridge to allow 2 mm of buccal and lingual plate will be required.
  7. No apical disorder/inflammation at the area of the implant site.
  8. Residual bone height ranging from 6 to 9 mm.
  9. The implant must penetrate at least 2 mm into the sinus on the mesial or distal sides.
  10. Sufficient bone width in the edentulous region (≥ 6mm).
  11. Subjects must be committed to the study and attend the required follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with a systemic disease that would preclude dental implant surgery (e.g. serious internal medical problems, disorders of bone metabolism, uncontrolled bleeding disorders, weakened immune system, illness requiring periodic use of steroids, uncontrollable endocrine disorders, uncontrolled diabetes).
  2. Subjects who have failed to maintain good plaque control.
  3. Subjects with any contraindications for oral surgical procedures (e.g. inadequate wound healing capacity, poor oral hygiene, maxillary and mandibular growth not completed, xerostomia).
  4. Subjects with mucosal diseases (e.g., erosive lichen planus) in the localized area around the study implant site.
  5. Subjects presenting with maxillary sinus pathology.
  6. Subjects with a history of local irradiation therapy in the head/neck region.
  7. Subjects with severe bruxing, parafunctional habits, or temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
  8. Subjects receiving, or having a history of receiving intravenous or subcutaneous antiresorptive agents associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw, such as bisphosphonates.
  9. Oblique sinus floor (> 45 inclination).
  10. Subjects with any untreated endodontic lesions or untreated periodontal disease.
  11. Subjects who are heavy smokers (defined as >10 cigarettes per day or >1 cigar per day) or chew tobacco, including within 3 months prior to enrollment.
  12. Subjects who have physical or mental handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene.
  13. Subjects who are pregnant or intending to become pregnant during the duration of the study.
  14. Subjects requiring bone augmentation or socket grafting prior to surgery.
  15. Subject allergic to collagen or porcine derived products.
  16. Subjects with conditions or circumstances, in the opinion of the investigator, which would prevent completion of study participation or interfere with analysis of study results, such as history of non- compliance or unreliability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1
Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation using platform switched implant with bone graft material.
Anorganic bovine bone graft material is intended for augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge, filling periodontal defects, filling defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy, filling extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge, and elevation of maxillary sinus floor.
Shelta implant systems are intended for immediate placement and function on single tooth and/or multiple tooth applications when good primary stability is achieved, with appropriate occlusal loading, in order to restore chewing function.
Active Comparator: Arm 2
Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation using platform switched implant with no bone graft material.
Shelta implant systems are intended for immediate placement and function on single tooth and/or multiple tooth applications when good primary stability is achieved, with appropriate occlusal loading, in order to restore chewing function.
Collagen dental wound dressing is intended for the management of oral wounds and sores, including; dental sores, oral ulcers, periodontal surgical wounds, suture sites, burns, extraction sites, surgical wounds, and traumatic wounds.
Active Comparator: Arm 3
Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation using platform matching implant with bone graft material.
Anorganic bovine bone graft material is intended for augmentation or reconstructive treatment of the alveolar ridge, filling periodontal defects, filling defects after root resection, apicoectomy, and cystectomy, filling extraction sockets to enhance preservation of the alveolar ridge, and elevation of maxillary sinus floor.
Shelta implant systems are intended for immediate placement and function on single tooth and /or multiple tooth applications when good primary stability is achieved, with appropriate occlusal loading, in order to restore chewing function.
Active Comparator: Arm 4
Transcrestal Sinus Floor Elevation using platform matching implant with no bone graft material.
Collagen dental wound dressing is intended for the management of oral wounds and sores, including; dental sores, oral ulcers, periodontal surgical wounds, suture sites, burns, extraction sites, surgical wounds, and traumatic wounds.
Shelta implant systems are intended for immediate placement and function on single tooth and /or multiple tooth applications when good primary stability is achieved, with appropriate occlusal loading, in order to restore chewing function.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean crestal bone level changes measured in mm using periapical radiographs and CT scans.
Time Frame: 12 months
Mean crestal bone level change around the implants will be determined by periapical radiographs of mesial and distal bone levels. CT scans will be used to determine buccal and lingual bone level change between implant placement and 12 months, following placement of a platform switched implants or platform matching implants.
12 months
Mean periapical sinus bone level changes measured in mm using periapical radiographs and CT scans.
Time Frame: 12 months
Mean periapical sinus bone level change between implant placement and 12 months will be determined by radiographic measurement (using periapical radiographs and CT scans) following placement of a platform switched implant or platform matching implant in the posterior region of the maxilla, with bone graft material or without bone graft material.
12 months
Implant survival measured through observation.
Time Frame: 12 months
Implant survival will be measured at implant loading and 12 months following implant placement will be assessed through clinical observation.
12 months
Implant success rate measured by percentage.
Time Frame: 12 months
Implant success rate will be assessed at implant loading and 12 months following implant placement measured by percentage.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Crestal bone height changes measured in mm using periapical radiographs.
Time Frame: 12 months
Additional crestal bone height change determined by measurements of periapical radiographs of mesial and distal bone levels between implant placement and implant loading, and between implant loading and 12 months post-implant placement.
12 months
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) measured in N/cm.
Time Frame: 6 months
Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ) between implant placement and implant loading and at 6 months and between implant loading.
6 months
Periodontal Pocket Depths measured in mm.
Time Frame: 12 months
Periodontal Pocket Depths assessed at screening, implant loading, and 12 months post-implant placement.
12 months
Subject satisfaction assessed through questionnaire.
Time Frame: 12 months
Subject satisfaction at implant placement, immediate post-operative, and 12 months post-implant placement.
12 months
Changes in sinus anatomy measured in mm compared to implant survival.
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in the sinus anatomy measured in mm compared to implant survival.
12 months
Changes in sinus anatomy measured in mm compared to implant success.
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in the sinus anatomy measured in mm compared to implant success.
12 months
Changes in sinus anatomy measured in mm compared to crestal bone changes.
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in the sinus anatomy measured in mm compared to crestal bone level changes. implant stability (ISQ).
12 months
Changes in sinus anatomy measured in mm compared to implant stability.
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in the sinus anatomy measured in mm compared to implant stability (ISQ).
12 months
Changes residual crestal bone height measured in mm compared to implant survival.
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in residual crestal bone height compared to implant survival.
12 months
Changes residual crestal bone height measured in mm compared to implant success.
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in residual crestal bone height compared to implant success.
12 months
Changes residual crestal bone height measured in mm compared to implant stability.
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in residual crestal bone height compared to implant stability (ISQ).
12 months
Changes residual crestal bone height measured in mm compaierd to sinus bone levels.
Time Frame: 12 months
Changes in residual crestal bone height compared to sinus bone levels.
12 months
Bleeding on probing measured by present or not present.
Time Frame: 12 months
Bleeding on probing assessed at screening, implant loading, and 12 months post-implant placement.
12 months
Gingival Recession measured in mm.
Time Frame: 12 months
Gingival recession assessed at screening, implant loading, and 12 months post-implant placement.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ismael E Khouly, DDS, MS, PhD, Bluestone Center for Clinical Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 15-01349

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tooth Loss

Clinical Trials on Anorganic Bovine Bone Graft Material

3
Subscribe