Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy (MOP)

September 8, 2021 updated by: Jan Ivar Røssberg, MD, Oslo University Hospital

What Works for Whom and How? Mechanisms of Change in Psychotherapy

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a prevalent psychiatric condition associated with significant disability, mortality and economic burden. MDD is ranked fourth in terms of disease burden as defined by the World Health Organization (2001). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (PDT) are found to be equally effective for patients with depression. However, many patients do not respond sufficiently to treatment and relapse rates are high. To be able to offer individualized treatment, a clinically important question is therefore whether some patients profit more from one of the two therapies. At present little is known on which patient characteristics (moderators) may be associated with differential outcomes of CBT and PDT and through what kind of therapeutic processes and mechanisms (mediators) improvements occur in each therapy mode. There are actually only theoretical assumptions sparsely supported by research findings on what moderates and mediates the treatment effects of CBT and PDT.

Aims: The overall aim of this project is to examine putative moderators and mediators in CBT and PDT and develop more basic knowledge about their impact on outcomes of psychotherapy for patients with MDD.

Methods and study design: The study is a randomized clinical trial. One hundred patients will be randomized to one of two treatment conditions. The patients will be treated over 28 weeks with either CBT (one weekly session over 16 weeks and 3 booster sessions (monthly) during the rest of the 28 week study period) or PDT (one weekly session in 28 weeks). The patients will be evaluated at baseline, during therapy, at the end of therapy, and at follow-up investigations 1 and 3 years after treatment termination. The outcome measures comprise a large range of clinical and process variables, including assessment tools measuring specific preselected putative moderators and mediators.

Discussion: The clinical outcome of this trial may guide clinicians to decide what kind of treatment should be offered the individual patient. Moreover, it will shed light on what kind of mechanisms in psychotherapy that is followed by symptom improvement and increased psychosocial functioning.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged between 18-65 years, with depressive disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association, 2000) unipolar MDD diagnosis will be included.MINI plus (Sheehan et al., 1998 will be used as assessment tool. Comorbidity is expected to be frequent. Written consent will be obtained from all patients.
  • The participants need to have the ability to speak and understand a Scandinavian language, and willingness and ability to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past neurological illness, traumatic brain injury, current alcohol and/or substance dependency disorders, psychotic disorders, developmental disorders, and mental retardation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive behavior therapy
The included patients will receive cognitive therapy for depression for 16 weeks and monthly booster sessions up to 28 weeks.
In this study we want to compare CBT and PDT and examine whether some patients will benefit from CBT and other from PDT. More specifically we want to examine moderators and mediators for improvement in depressive symptoms in the two interventions arms.
Other Names:
  • Psychodynamic psychotherapy
Active Comparator: Psychodynamic psychotherapy
The included patients will receive time-limited psychodynamic psychotherapy for 28 weeks.
In this study we want to compare CBT and PDT and examine whether some patients will benefit from CBT and other from PDT. More specifically we want to examine moderators and mediators for improvement in depressive symptoms in the two interventions arms.
Other Names:
  • Psychodynamic psychotherapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
Time Frame: Change in scores between baseline and 28 weeks (end of therapy) and change between baseline and one and three year follow-up
Assessment of depression
Change in scores between baseline and 28 weeks (end of therapy) and change between baseline and one and three year follow-up
Beck Depression Index
Time Frame: Change in scores between baseline and 28 weeks (end of therapy) and change between baseline and one and three year follow-up
Assessment of depression
Change in scores between baseline and 28 weeks (end of therapy) and change between baseline and one and three year follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychodynamic Functioning Scale
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Assesment of dynamic functioning
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Beck Cognitive Insight Score
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Assessment of cognitive insight
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Global Assesment of Functioning
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Assessment of global symptoms and functioning
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Inventory of Interpersonal Problems
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Measure of interpersonal problems
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Reflective functioning - depression
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Assessment of reflective functioning
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Dysfunctional Attitude Scale
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Measure of dysfunctional attitude
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Metacognitive questionnaire
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Assessments of metacognition
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Work and Social Adjustment Scale
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Assessment of functioning
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
The Short Form Health Survey
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Measure of general Health issues
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline (inclusion). Moderator of treatment
Measure of childhood trauma
Baseline (inclusion). Moderator of treatment
Severity of Indices of personality Problems
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Assessments of personality dimensions
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Toronto Alexithymia Scale
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Measures of alexithymia
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Rumination respons scale
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Measures of ruminations
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Structural Analysis of Social Behavior
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Measure social behavior
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Experience in Close Relationship Inventory
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Functioning in Close relations
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Patient Health questionnaire
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Measure anxiety
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (8 weeks, 16 weeks, 28 weeks, 1 year and 3 year follow up)
Hypomani Checlist
Time Frame: Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)
Measures hypomanic symptoms
Change in scores during therapy and the follow-up periode (one and three years)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan I Røssberg, phD, Oslo University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • What works for whom and how?

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Cognitive behavior therapy

3
Subscribe