Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser in Decontamination of Dental Implants: An In-Vitro Study

March 3, 2023 updated by: Robert Gyurko, DMD, PhD, Tufts University

The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons estimated that 69% of adults ages 35 to 44 have lost at least one permanent tooth. Dental implants have revolutionized dentistry by providing tooth-like replacement for missing teeth and a solution that is predictable with long-term success..

After the implant is placed, natural bacteria from the mouth can develop around implants just like around natural teeth. Studies have shown that bacterial contamination can cause peri-implantitis- gum disease or inflammation around the implant, eventually leading to bone loss. Removing bacteria from dental implant surfaces can prevent peri-implantitis, and surface debridement constitutes the basis of treatment of peri-implant disease.

Typically, mechanical hand instrumentation using curettes to remove biofilm and calculus is the main basis for periodontal therapy. However, total debridement is difficult, and the hand tools may damage the surface of the implant and making it more plaque retentive. Studies have shown that mechanical non-surgical therapy alone is not sufficient to treat peri-implantitis.

There is evidence that a dental laser may be an effective method to remove bacteria from implant surfaces, with less damage to the surface. One type of dental laser, Er:YAG, appears optimal for implant decontamination as the Er:YAG laser energy is primarily absorbed by water, resulting in vaporization of bacteria and minimal surface alterations on the implant surface.The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of biofilm decontamination of Er:YAG laser compared to carbon fiber curette.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the amount of residual biofilm on titanium discs after decontamination with Er:YAG laser and carbon fiber curette.

In the first phase of the study, custom mouth guards that holds multiple titanium discs will be fabricated. Experimental subjects will be instructed to wear this mouth guard for 72 hours, during which time a natural bacterial biofilm will form on the disc surfaces.

The second phase of the study will be performed ex vivo after collecting the discs from the subjects. Discs retrieved from each mouth guard will be randomized over the 4 treatment groups, so that each subject will contribute two discs to each treatment group: 1) Er:YAG laser, 2) carbon fiber curette, 3) combination of carbon fiber curette and Er:YAG laser, and 4) no treatment (control). The biofilm will be stained and the residual biofilm will be visualized under fluorescence microscopy. Statistical methods will be used to determine the significance of each treatment modality.

The primary outcome of the study is the percent area of the titanium disc covered by biofilm.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
        • Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of enough teeth to support the mouth guard.
  • Subjects diagnosed with clinical health, gingivitis, or slight chronic periodontitis defined as periodontal inflammation with slight (1-2mm) attachment loss.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with insufficient dental support for the mouth guard
  • Subjects diagnosed with moderate or severe chronic periodontitis.
  • Subjects with known allergy to acrylic or titanium.
  • Subjects who smoke cigarettes, cigars, snuff tobacco, or any other form of smoking.
  • Subjects with a history of antibiotic treatment within the last six months.
  • Subjects with contraindications to wearing a mouth guard, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or severe sleep apnea.
  • Subjects with uncontrolled or debilitating medical conditions, including but not limited to subjects with uncontrolled diabetes, hematologic disorders, cancers, immunosuppression, severe cardiovascular disease, or uncontrolled thyroid disease
  • Subjects that are currently pregnant according to self-report

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Er:YAG Laser
Er:YAG Laser only
Titanium disks will be decontaminated ex-vivo with the Er:YAG laser.
Active Comparator: Carbon Fiber Curette
Carbon fiber curette only
Titanium disks will be decontaminated ex-vivo with carbon fiber curettes
Experimental: Er:YAG Laser + Carbon Fiber Curette
Combination of Er:YAG Laser and carbon fiber curette
Titanium disks will be decontaminated ex-vivo with the Er:YAG laser.
Titanium disks will be decontaminated ex-vivo with carbon fiber curettes
No Intervention: No Treatment
No treatment (control)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Bacteria Biofilm
Time Frame: 3 days
Percent area of the titanium disc covered by bacteria biofilm
3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Gyurko, DMD, PhD, TUSDM

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 20, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 18, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peri-Implantitis

Clinical Trials on Er:YAG Laser

3
Subscribe