Advanced Non-Invasive Diagnostics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (ANDI)

October 31, 2022 updated by: Jacob Brodersen, Hospital of South West Jutland

A Comparative Study of the Diagnostic Validity of Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Capsule Endoscopy of Both the Small and Large Intestine in Suspected Crohn's Disease

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Non-invasive endoscopic procedures (pillcam colon capsule endoscopy, PCCE) and non-ionizing radiological modalities (MR enterocolonography, MREC and ultrasound, US) - offer a sufficiently high diagnostic validity in patients with suspected CD compared to the traditional invasive approach using ileocolonoscopy with biopsies as first line diagnostic modality

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, blinded, multicenter study of the diagnostic validity, inter-observer agreement, image quality and subjective experience of discomfort with PCCE, MREC and US in patients with suspected CD. Ileocolonoscopy serves as the diagnostic gold standard. Patients are recruited from 3 centers in the Region of Southern Denmark managing adult patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Each patient goes through a standardized work-up including medical history, physical examination, C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin, ileocolonoscopy, PCCE, MREC and US. All examinations are reviewed and described in a standardized fashion. The radiologists and physicians describing PCCE, MREC, and US are blinded to the findings at ileocolonoscopy and the other imaging modalities.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

153

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Esbjerg, Denmark, DK-6700
        • Sydvestjysk Sygehus
      • Odense, Denmark, DK-5000
        • Odense University Hospital
      • Vejle, Denmark, DK-7100
        • Sygehus Lillebaelt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

General criterion

All of the following:

  • Clinical suspicion of CD
  • Age > 15 years
  • Negative serologic markers for celiac disease, negative stool culture (or polymerase chain reaction) for pathogenic bacteria and a negative microscopy for intestinal parasites
  • Fecal calprotectin > 50 mg/kg
  • Signed informed consent

Clinical criterion Diarrhea and/or abdominal pain for more than 1 month (or repeated episodes of diarrhea and/or abdominal pain) associated with one or more of the following findings: (1) C-reactive protein (CRP) >5 mg/L, (2) thrombocytosis (> 400 x 109/L), anemia (hemoglobin < 7.0 mmol/L for women and < 8.0 mmol /L for men or a decrease > 0.5 mmol/L compared to the usual level), (3) prolonged fever (> 37.5 C for more than 2 weeks), (5) weight loss (≥ 3 kg or ≥ 5% compared to the normal body weight), (6) perianal abscess/fistula, or (7) a family history of inflammatory bowel disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute bowel obstruction
  • Intake of NSAIDs or acetylsalicylic acid ≤ 4 weeks before inclusion except prophylactic treatment with low dose Aspirin (≤ 150 mg per day)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Known gastrointestinal disorder other than inflammatory bowel disease
  • Renal failure defined by a plasma-creatinine above the normal reference range
  • Claustrophobia, cardiac pacemaker or implanted magnetic foreign bodies that precludes MREC
  • Interpreter required or inability to understand the oral and written information
  • Colonoscopy contraindicated, performed within 3 months or unwillingness to go through colonoscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: trial participant
All participants undergoes the same diagnostic imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE, MREC and US for the diagnosis of CD
Time Frame: 36 months
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE, MREC and US for the diagnosis of CD located in the terminal ileum and colon (per patient & per segment). Ileocolonoscopy serves as gold standard
36 months
Correlation of disease severity
Time Frame: 36 months
Correlation of disease severity assessed with PCCE, MREC, US and ileocolonoscopy
36 months
Inter-observer agreement
Time Frame: 36 months
Inter-observer agreement with PCCE, MREC, US and ileocolonoscopy
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic yield of proximal CD
Time Frame: 36 months
Diagnostic yield of PCCE, MREC and US for CD located proximal to the terminal ileum
36 months
Patients reported experience
Time Frame: 36 months
Patients' subjective experience of discomfort during PCCE, MREC, US and ileocolonoscopy
36 months
Interobserver PCCE
Time Frame: 36 months
Sensitivity and specificity of PCCE with different reading protocols
36 months
Utility of diffusion weighed magnetic resonance imaging (dw-MREC) and US Doppler flow
Time Frame: 36 months
Utility of diffusion weighed magnetic resonance imaging (dw-MREC) and US Doppler flow (Limberg score): Sensitivity, specificity and correlation with endoscopic disease activity
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacob B Brodersen, MD, Hospital of South West Jutland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

October 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Crohn Disease

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic imaging

3
Subscribe