nCD64 vs. Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting In-hospital Outcome in AE-COPD

May 9, 2017 updated by: Aliae AR Mohamed Hussein, Assiut University

Neutrophil CD64 Versus Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) as Markers Predicting In-hospital Outcome in Acute Exacerbation of COPD

Neutrophil CD64 versus Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as markers predicting in-hospital outcome in acute exacerbation of COPD

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Acute exacerbation of COPD is among the most frequent reasons for hospitalisation. Approximately 4% of the general population in the western world is admitted with an acute respiratory disease at least once a year and nearly one fifth of hospital visits is due to acute exacerbation of COPD. Early identifications and management of AE-COPD is an important issue in clinical practice. AE-COPD is accompanied with various worsening respiratory symptoms and deterioration in lung function. Also the frequency and severity of attacks is associated with increased mortality.

During exacerbation, the inflammation in COPD is amplified in comparison with stable periods. The increased level of inflammatory markers is associated with lung function decline. As infection, is the main cause leading to clinical AECOPD, white blood cell counts and ESR are the common markers to show the existence of infection in patients with COPD. Recently, other bio markers are used. Authors have found that the high-affinity Fc receptor-CD64 is expressed by monocytes and only weakly on resting neutrophils. The high-expression of neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) is an early step in the host- immune response to bacterial infection. Studies have shown that the nCD64 might be used as a bio-marker for early-onset sepsis or bacterial infection. However, authors agreed that the value of the nCD64 in COPD prognosis is unknown.

As most of novel bio-markers that identify the severity of acute exacerbation in COPD, are time consuming and expensive, there is a need to use more simple tests. The Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is a rapid, easy and cost-effective method derived from routine complete blood count tests in clinical practice. The NLR could be an important marker that assess inflammatory status in patients with COPD and could identify early, acute exacerbation. However, this bio marker has not been widely used in the diagnosis of AECOPD.

The purpose of the present study is: 1- To measure the values of the neutrophil CD64 and NLR in patients with AECOPD and stable COPD, 2- to correlate between nCD64, NLR and the usual routine bio-markers as white blood cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 3- to investigate the role of nCD64 and NLR as predictors for short term hospital outcome in this group.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Assiut, Egypt, 71111
        • AssiutU

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The exacerbation of COPD is defined as the patient being diagnosed with COPD with two or more of the following three symptoms of exacerbations: new or worsening cough, worsened dyspnea, and worsened sputum volume and/or change in its color.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients diagnosed as AECOPD and stable COPD ( random selection by 1:1 cross over). A diagnosis of COPD was made by a clinical history, examination and spirometer (forced expiratory volume in 1st second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC)ratio of <0.7). The severity of COPD was graded according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of current respiratory disorders other than COPD, malignancy, systemic auto-immune disorders, recent surgery and severe endocrine, hepatic or renal diseases. Patients with pneumonia, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
COPD patients
A diagnosis of COPD was made by a clinical history, examination and spirometer (forced expiratory volume in 1st second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC)ratio of <0.7). The severity of COPD was graded according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines. [9] (Stage I, mild COPD: FEV1≥80.0% predicted; Stage II, moderate COPD: FEV1 80-50.0%; Stage III, severe COPD: FEV1 50- 30.0%; Stage IV, very severe COPD: FEV1< 30.0%). The exacerbation of COPD was defined as the patient being diagnosed with COPD with two or more of the following three symptoms of exacerbations: new or worsening cough, worsened dyspnea, and worsened sputum volume and/or change in its color.
neutrophil CD64
Other Names:
  • neutrophil CD64
Neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio
Other Names:
  • NLR
control
healthy sex and age matched group
neutrophil CD64
Other Names:
  • neutrophil CD64
Neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio
Other Names:
  • NLR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Define the cut off values of the nCD64 and NLR in patients with AE-COPD and stable COPD
Time Frame: 3 months
level of nCD64 and NLR that define exacerbation
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Can nCD64 and NLR as markers be used as predictors for short term hospital outcome
Time Frame: 3 months
correlate between level of these markers and hospital outcome
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 11, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 7, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 11, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Copd

3
Subscribe