Experiences With HDR-brachytherapy in Norway

May 23, 2017 updated by: Trude Baastad Wedde, Oslo University Hospital

Norwegian Experiences With Interstitial Radiation Treatment (Brachytherapy) for Men With High-risk Localised Prostate Cancer

There are 3 articles that will be written about the experience with HDR-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in patients with high-risk prostate cancer in Norway as part of a doctorial thesis-project. The project will focus on survival, side-effects and dosimetry variables as the main points of interest.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

First article will compare overall and prostate cancer specific-mortality in patients who has received HDR-BT compared to patients who has received external beam radiation therapy only (EBRT). Patients who have been treated with HDR-BT have been enrolled in an approved registry at Oslo University Hospital since 2004. The control group (EBRT only) data are from the Lancet published hallmark study SPCG-7 (Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group). This is a case-control study.

Second article will focus on side-effects of HDR-BT compared to EBRT patients. Patients included in the registry described above have been sent (and completed with a 72% answer rate) a questionnaire of the standard Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC-26) form. This will be compared to patients who already have answered the same questionnaire in a previously published study (approved by the Norwegian Ethical Committee).

The Third article will investigate if there are any association between patients reporting severe adverse effects after HDR-BT and the patients dosimetry reports (i.e are there a larger dose to the urethra or rectum in these patients?)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

325

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway
        • Oslo University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Men are included from the south-east area of Norway and for control Groups from the entire country so that the study population is generalised.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age, high-risk prostate cancer, general good Health, anatomical favourable condition for brachytherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • poor Health, metastasis, T3b stage tumour, Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels > 75, biological age > 75 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group (SPCG), study number 7
Patients included in hallmark study of SPCG-7 receiving EBRT to 70 Gy in combination with lifelong anti-androgen treatment
Norwegian Urologic Cancer Group (NUCG) study number 7
Patients receiving EBRT to 74 Gy in combination with hormonal therapy. Approved by ethical comittee. Questionnaires already been completed during a different study (NUCG-7). These patients will therefore not be contacted again.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall- and Prostate-Cancer specific mortality in patients treated with HDR-BT compared to EBRT alone
Time Frame: 24 weeks
The final measured outcome is death by prostate cancer, death due to other cause (overall mortality) or alive at 10 years.
24 weeks
Patient-reported side-effects after HDR-BT compared to conventional EBRT
Time Frame: 1 year
Patient self-reported side-effects focusing on rectal, bladder, quality of life, sexual function and psycological bother will be recorded in both Groups and compared.
1 year
Are there an Association between rectal dosage after HDR-BT and self-reported rectal bother in patients undergone HDR-BT treatment ?
Time Frame: 2 years
Investigations into needle placement, dosage and anatomical variations will be examined in patients who report rectal problems 5 years after HDR-BT treatment.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Trude Wedde, MD, Oslo University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 15, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on High-Dose Rate Brachytherapy

3
Subscribe