- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03166436
RFA for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Stenting Versus Stenting Alone for Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are the most common causes of malignant biliary obstruction. They are diseases of increasing incidence and unfavorable prognosis. Only a minority of patients have a localized disease and are indicated for surgery with a chance of long-term survival. Locally advanced and metastatic tumors are treated with palliative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; the results of such treatments are unsatisfactory. The average survival of patients with unresectable disease is 6 months and only 5 - 10 % of patients survive 5 years. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy can be used, however only with a palliative effect. Biliary drainage is an integral part of palliative treatment. Endoscopically or percutaneously placed stents improve quality of life, decrease cholestasis and pruritus, but do not significantly improve survival. Biliary stents get occluded over time, possibly resulting in acute cholangitis and require repeated replacement. Endoluminal biliary photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), locally active endoscopic methods, have been increasingly used in recent years in palliative treatment of patients with malignant biliary obstruction. In photodynamic therapy, improved survival has been shown in two randomized controlled trials; however the technique suffers from technical complexity, high cost and low availability. In RFA, application of low voltage high frequency current during radiofrequency ablation results in tissue destruction by heat. Its antitumor effect may also be related to systemic changes in antitumor immunity. The use of endoluminal biliary RFA has so far been reported only in small retrospective cohorts of patients.
The aim of this randomized study is to compare efficacy of RFA plus stenting to stenting alone in palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction with survival as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes are stent patency, immediate and late complications, quality of life and effects on anti-tumor immunity in the RFA group.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer are by far the two most common causes of malignant bile duct obstruction. Cholangiocarcinoma is an adenocarcinoma originating in the bile duct whereas pancreatic cancer is an adenocarcinoma derived from pancreatic ductal cells. The incidence rates of both diseases have been rising over the past decades. Both diseases still have a very unfavorable prognosis with 5 year survival rates as low as 5-10%. Surgery represents the only therapeutic modality with a curative potential, however most patients are non-eligible for surgical treatment at the time of diagnosis. Patients present with either distant metastases, have a locally advanced disease or are unfit for surgery because of advanced age and/or co-morbidities. The prognosis of patients with unresectable bile duct or pancreatic cancer is poor with a median survival time of about 6 months. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy provide only a slight survival benefit and thus have only palliative intent.
Most patients with cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer present with bile duct obstruction in the course of their disease. Bile duct obstruction relief is an important part of palliation therapy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with bile duct stenting is the method of choice with a high rate of technical success and a lower complication rate compared to surgery. Biliary stents are either plastic or metal (self-expandable metal stents, SEMS). SEMS can be covered, uncovered or partially covered. Plastic stents are cheaper and easier to exchange but have a shorter patency compared to metal stents. Metal stents have been shown to improve survival of patients with proximal malignant biliary obstruction. Both plastic and metal become occluded in a significant proportion of patients, especially in those with a longer life expectancy. Stent occlusion is often an acute event leading to sepsis and a prompt intervention is required. Failure of achieving adequate drainage may result in severe cholangitis and death.
Photodynamic therapy has been used for bile duct tumor ablation for more than a decade. It is a two stage process in which a photosensitizing agent is taken by the tumor tissue and is than activated by light of a specific wave length. Two randomized trials showed improved survival of patients treated with PDT plus stenting compared to stenting alone. However, side effects of photodynamic therapy such as phototoxicity, high costs and limited availability restrict the use of PDT.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), by means of alternating high-frequency current, generates heat that results in coagulation necrosis of tissue. It is widely used to treat liver tumors or dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Endoluminal biliary RFA has become possible upon availability of narrow ERCP RFA catheters and represents a new modality of intraductal tumor ablation. The probe can be introduced over a 0.035-inch wire through a standard endoscope, thus allowing endoscopic ablation of malignant bile duct obstruction. The bipolar catheter has multiple circumferential electrodes at the distal tip. The coagulative effect is delivered in the area between the two electrodes.
A few human non-randomized case series investigating the safety and efficiency of RFA were reported. Steel at al reported their results in 22 patients with malignant bile duct obstruction (16 patients with pancreatic cancer and 6 patients with cholangiocarcinoma). Immediate, 30 day complication rates and 90 day stent patency were evaluated as primary parameters. Intraductal RFA was followed by a SEMS placement. One patient developed asymptomatic elevation of amylase, one patients developed rigors and two patients developed cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy. All except 3 patients achieved 90 day stent patency.
In a recent study of Sharaiha et al, 26 patients with pancreatic or bile duct cancer underwent RFA followed by plastic or metal stent placement. They were compared to 40 matched controls who underwent only stenting. Technical success rate was 100%. Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed RFA to be an independent predictor of survival [HR 0.29 (0.11-0.76), p = 0.012] together with age and receipt of chemotherapy [HR 1.04 (1.01-1.07), p = 0.011; HR 0.26 (0.10-0.70), p = 0.007]. Surprisingly, SEMS patency rates were the same across all groups.
In an Austrian national retrospective study, 84 ablations were performed in 58 patients in 11 centers. Cholangiocarcinoma was present in 45 patients. Technical feasibility was 100%, however multiple complications occurred (1 liver infarct, 5 cholangitis, 3 hemobilia, 2 sepsis, 1 gall-bladder empyema, 1 liver coma).
RFA was also investigated in pancreatic cancers only. In a retrospective comparison of 23 patients and 46 controls, the median survival was better in the RFA group (226 vs. 123 days, p=0,01). The median stent patency was not different.
The safety profile of RFA seems to be acceptable, however severe complications have occured. In the study of Tal et al, 3 cases of bleeding were reported, two of them resulted in death. In all of these patients, plastic stents were used.
Increasing evidence indicates that RFA might stimulate anti-tumor immunity. Active anti-cancer immune responses depend on efficient presentation of tumor antigens and cytokine-mediated stimulatory signaling. Tumor cells are generally regarded as poor stimulators of T-cells. In contrast, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are highly specialized in this function and are therefore important in the process of stimulation of T-cell responses to tumors. RFA has been shown to stimulate anti-tumor immunity through the induction of heat shock proteins, especially HSP 70. HSPs have the capacity to affect the immunogenicity of tumor cells, to chaperone antigenic peptides and deliver them into APCs, thus activate and regulate innate and adaptive immunity.
Based on the available evidence, RFA seems to be a technically feasible technique of malignant bile duct stricture ablation with a favorable safety profile. Retrospective case series have reported improved stent patency and survival in cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer patients following RFA. Thus, endoluminal RFA may represent a novel treatment modality in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. For this to happen, however, prospectively obtained comparative data with established treatment, i.e. biliary stenting, regarding safety and efficiency are necessary.
The investigators aim to compare endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stenting vs. stenting alone for malignant bile duct obstruction not eligible for surgical resection in a randomized controlled trial.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Tomas Hucl, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 00420261362600
- Email: tomas.hucl@ikem.cz
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Petra Truxova, Ing
- Phone Number: 00420261362619
- Email: petra.truxova@ikem.cz
Study Locations
-
-
-
Prague, Czechia, 14021
- Recruiting
- Department of gastroenterology and hepatology
-
Contact:
- Tomas Hucl, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 00420261362600
- Email: tomas.hucl@ikem.cz
-
Contact:
- Petra Truxova, Ing
- Phone Number: 00420261362619
- Email: petra.truxova@ikem.cz
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age over 18
- Pathologically confirmed malignant bile duct obstruction (cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer)
- Laboratory signs of biliary obstruction
- Non-resectable disease (distant metastasis, locally advanced disease, patient related factors) based on a multidisciplinary team decision
- Capability of giving informed consent
- Life expectancy greater than 3 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unstable for ERC
- Inability to give informed consent
- Pregnancy
- Uncorrected coagulopathy
- Concomitant biliary oncological endoluminal therapy (photodynamic therapy, brachytherapy)
- Cardiac pacemaker
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: RFA plus stenting
Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation followed by biliary stenting
|
radiofrequency ablation
biliary stenting
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Stenting alone
Biliary stenting alone
|
biliary stenting
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Survival
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of days/months of survival (being alive) post intervention
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Stent patency
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of days/months of patent stent (not occluded) post intervention
|
12 months
|
Complications
Time Frame: 30 days
|
number of complications related to procedure (bleeding, perforation, cholangitis will be combined to report as a complication)
|
30 days
|
Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months
|
validated questionnaire investigating quality of live post intervention
|
12 months
|
Augmentation of antitumor immunity
Time Frame: 30 days
|
serum level of HSP 70 and selected cytokines will be measured from blood
|
30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Tomas Hucl, MD, PhD, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Rizvi S, Gores GJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2013 Dec;145(6):1215-29. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
- Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, Heaton N, Karani J, Pereira SP, Rosenberg WM, Tait P, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thillainayagam AV, Thomas HC, Wasan H; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 2012 Dec;61(12):1657-69. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301748. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
- Rerknimitr R, Angsuwatcharakon P, Ratanachu-ek T, Khor CJ, Ponnudurai R, Moon JH, Seo DW, Pantongrag-Brown L, Sangchan A, Pisespongsa P, Akaraviputh T, Reddy ND, Maydeo A, Itoi T, Pausawasdi N, Punamiya S, Attasaranya S, Devereaux B, Ramchandani M, Goh KL; Asia-Pacific Working Group on Hepatobiliary Cancers. Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;28(4):593-607. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12128.
- Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):607-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. Epub 2011 May 26.
- Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet. 1992 Dec 19-26;340(8834-8835):1488-92. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2.
- Sangchan A, Kongkasame W, Pugkhem A, Jenwitheesuk K, Mairiang P. Efficacy of metal and plastic stents in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jul;76(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.048. Epub 2012 May 15.
- Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mossner J, Lochs H. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.015.
- Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2426-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00318.x.
- Curley SA, Izzo F. Radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies. Int J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr;7(2):72-81. doi: 10.1007/s101470200010.
- Shaheen NJ, Overholt BF, Sampliner RE, Wolfsen HC, Wang KK, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK, Eisen GM, Fennerty MB, Hunter JG, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Bennett AE, Mashimo H, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Edmundowicz SA, Madanick RD, Peery AF, Muthusamy VR, Chang KJ, Kimmey MB, Spechler SJ, Siddiqui AA, Souza RF, Infantolino A, Dumot JA, Falk GW, Galanko JA, Jobe BA, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Sharma P, Chak A, Lightdale CJ. Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011 Aug;141(2):460-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.061. Epub 2011 May 6.
- Zacharoulis D, Lazoura O, Sioka E, Potamianos S, Tzovaras G, Nicholls J, Koukoulis G, Habib N. Habib EndoHPB: a novel endobiliary radiofrequency ablation device. An experimental study. J Invest Surg. 2013 Feb;26(1):6-10. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2012.681832. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
- Steel AW, Postgate AJ, Khorsandi S, Nicholls J, Jiao L, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation appears to be safe in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.031.
- Sharaiha RZ, Natov N, Glockenberg KS, Widmer J, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Comparison of metal stenting with radiofrequency ablation versus stenting alone for treating malignant biliary strictures: is there an added benefit? Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Dec;59(12):3099-102. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3264-6. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
- Monga A, Gupta R, Ramchandani M, Rao GV, Santosh D, Reddy DN. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of cholangiocarcinoma: new palliative treatment modality (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):935-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.018. Epub 2010 Dec 18. No abstract available.
- Dolak W, Schreiber F, Schwaighofer H, Gschwantler M, Plieschnegger W, Ziachehabi A, Mayer A, Kramer L, Kopecky A, Schrutka-Kolbl C, Wolkersdorfer G, Madl C, Berr F, Trauner M, Puspok A; Austrian Biliary RFA Study Group. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction: a nationwide retrospective study of 84 consecutive applications. Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):854-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3232-9. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
- Kallis Y, Phillips N, Steel A, Kaltsidis H, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Analysis of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Biliary Malignant Strictures in Pancreatic Cancer Suggests Potential Survival Benefit. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Nov;60(11):3449-55. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3731-8. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
- Tal AO, Vermehren J, Friedrich-Rust M, Bojunga J, Sarrazin C, Zeuzem S, Trojan J, Albert JG. Intraductal endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hilar non-resectable malignant bile duct obstruction. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jan 16;6(1):13-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i1.13.
- Wu F. Heat-Based Tumor Ablation: Role of the Immune Response. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;880:131-53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22536-4_8.
- Witzigmann H, Berr F, Ringel U, Caca K, Uhlmann D, Schoppmeyer K, Tannapfel A, Wittekind C, Mossner J, Hauss J, Wiedmann M. Surgical and palliative management and outcome in 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: palliative photodynamic therapy plus stenting is comparable to r1/r2 resection. Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):230-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217639.10331.47.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IKEM RFA CCA PC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cholangiocarcinoma
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingStage III Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma | Oligometastatic Intrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingStage III Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Metastatic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Intrahepatic CholangiocarcinomaUnited States
-
RedHill Biopharma LimitedCompletedCholangiocarcinoma | Cholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable | Cholangiocarcinoma, Perihilar | Cholangiocarcinoma, Extrahepatic | Cholangiocarcinoma, IntrahepaticUnited States
-
RedHill Biopharma LimitedAvailableCholangiocarcinoma | Cholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable | Cholangiocarcinoma, Perihilar | Cholangiocarcinoma, Extrahepatic | Cholangiocarcinoma, Intrahepatic
-
Emory UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institutes of Health (NIH); CelgeneActive, not recruitingResectable Cholangiocarcinoma | Stage IB Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage II Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage III Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8United States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage III Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Gallbladder Carcinoma | Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma | Stage IV Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Unresectable CholangiocarcinomaUnited States
-
Emory UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage II Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage III Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Resectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma | Stage 0 Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage I Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8United States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHServierCompletedCholangiocarcinoma Non-resectable | Cholangiocarcinoma of the Gallbladder | Cholangiocarcinoma Metastatic | Cholangiocarcinoma AdvancedGermany
-
Academic and Community Cancer Research UnitedNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMetastatic Cholangiocarcinoma | Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma | Advanced CholangiocarcinomaUnited States
-
University of Kansas Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingStage III Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma | Locally Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma | Stage III Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Stage IV Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma AJCC v8 | Recurrent CholangiocarcinomaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Radiofrequency ablation
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTerminatedHepatocellular CancerFrance
-
Xijing HospitalUnknown
-
Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustRoyal Bournemouth and Christchurch Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustCompleted
-
Allevio Pain Management ClinicRecruitingShoulder Pain Chronic | Faceto-genic Neck Pain | Faceto-genic HeadacheCanada
-
Southwest Hospital, ChinaCompleted
-
Mansoura UniversityUnknownChronic Knee OsteoarthritisEgypt
-
University of CalgaryRecruitingOsteoarthritis, KneeCanada
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedHepatocellular CarcinomasFrance
-
Aalborg University HospitalOdense University Hospital; St. Antonius HospitalTerminatedParoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.Netherlands, Denmark
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgBelgium Health Care Knowledge Centre; Klinische Epidemiologie en Medical Technology...RecruitingKnee Osteoarthritis | Chronic Knee Pain | Persistent Postsurgical PainBelgium, Netherlands