Ridge Preservation With Provisional Ovoid Pontic

May 23, 2017 updated by: Bruno Salles Sotto-Maior, Federal University of Juiz de Fora

Ridge Preservation With Provisional Ovoid Pontic: a Randomized and Controlled Clinical-tomographic Trial

A prospective randomized controlled trial of 30 patients from the Faculty of Dentistry of the UFJF was conducted. It was included patients who presented indication of extraction of premolars, canines or incisors. All the thirty patients underwent dental extraction and were randomly divided into three groups according to the study methodology. Plaster casts and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) exams were performed for comparative analysis between sample groups and between study times ( imediate postoperative and four months later).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Thirty consecutive patients who presented at the Dentistry College of Federal University of Juiz de Fora (Brazil) were selected, requiring a single-tooth extraction of premolar, canines or incisors in maxilla. All of the patients included at this study signed a free and informed consent form, agreeing to participate voluntarily in this research. The study was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of the University of Juiz de Fora under the form 1.731.395.

The patients were randomly allocated in three groups according the following treatments:

  • Group 1: Closure of the socket by primary intention through a palatal pedicle subepithelial connective tissue flap by the technique of Khoury & Happe (2000) (Figure 1);
  • Group 2: Filling the socket with a synthetic bone substitute of biphasic calcium phosphate (Bone Ceramic®, Straumann) and covering it with a palatal pedicle flap by the technique of Khoury & Happe (2000) (Figure 2);
  • Group 3: Sealing of the socket with a provisional ovoid pontic of acrylic resin (Figure 3).

As response factors were performed evaluations of study casts and tomographic analysis for dimensional stability evaluation of the sockets at immediate postoperative and after four months of the surgical procedures.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with indication of extraction of premolars, canines or incisors, which has two adjacent teeth, due to root fracture, extensive caries that did not allow unfavorable restorative and / or endodontic prognosis, systemically healthy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who use any drug that influences bone metabolism, patients with a history of head radiotherapy and neck, patients undergoing chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant tumors at the time of the study, patients with socket severely reabsorbed, smokers and pregnant women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Palatal pedicle flap (Group 1)
On patients of this group were performed the palatal pedicle subepithelial connective tissue flap after the extraction, following the technique described by Khoury & Happe (2000), which consists of total detachment of the palatal flap followed by division of the flap to release the connective tissue, maintain a pedicle and sliding it to cover the fresh socket by primary intention. The sutures were removed seven to ten days of postoperative.
All the extractions were performed under local anaesthesia, minimally traumatic as possible. After the extraction, each patient was treated according to the group of their allocations.
EXPERIMENTAL: Graft + palatal pedicle flap (Group 2)
On patients of this group were performed the palatal pedicle flap like the group 1, however, the sockets were previously filled with a graft of synthetic bone substitute (Bone Ceramic®, Straumann, Switzerland) and then recovered with the connective flap and sutured by primary intention. The sutures were removed seven to ten days of postoperative.
All the extractions were performed under local anaesthesia, minimally traumatic as possible. After the extraction, each patient was treated according to the group of their allocations.
EXPERIMENTAL: Provisional ovoid pontic (Group 3)
On patients of this group, after the extraction of the tooth, were made a provisional ovoid pontic with acrylic resin or with the crown of the removed tooth itself, cut and sealed with composite resin. The pontics were placed to seal the entire gingival margin of the socket and penetrating 2 to 3 mm into it, stabilized laterally by the adjacent teeth with orthodontic and composite resin or acrylic resin. No sutures were made.
All the extractions were performed under local anaesthesia, minimally traumatic as possible. After the extraction, each patient was treated according to the group of their allocations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes of bone remodelation measured by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography exams and by plaster casts analysis, from baseline to 4 months
Time Frame: Baseline (immediate postoperative) and 4 months after it.
Will be measured width and height buccal-lingual of the ridge for each tooth extracted by the researcher.
Baseline (immediate postoperative) and 4 months after it.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 10, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared with other researchers, the data will be used for the same researcher on other research later.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alveolar Process Atrophy

Clinical Trials on Surgical procedures

3
Subscribe