Oral Health Education Interventions Among Seniors

Oral Health Education Interventions and Its Association With Behavioral Outcomes: A Clinical Trial

The study aims to assess the efficacy of an oral health education group based activity versus an individual based oral health education activity in terms of changes in oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL), self-efficacy and oral health knowledge.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Quality of Life; Self Efficacy; Knowledge
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Oral Health Education

Detailed Description

Older adults have been described as one of the most underserved and vulnerable groups, who are at the highest risk for coronal and root caries, especially because more elderly adults are retaining their teeth. The Northeast Philadelphia KleinLife site is an important destination for the region's Jewish population comprising of at least 6500 seniors, and assisting more than 4500 seniors through food security programs. Recently, Temple University Kornberg School of Dentistry (TUKSoD) purchased the dental center at the facility to expand the services provided to these underserved population and improve their oral health. The study aims to assess the efficacy of an oral health education group based activity versus an individual based oral health education activity in terms of changes in oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL), self-efficacy and oral health knowledge. Methods: A non-probability sample of 190 senior members will be invited to participate in the trial. Potential subjects will be obtained in person through the ongoing flow of patients at TUKSoD Clinic at Kleinlife and the dental school. Seniors who consent to participate in the study will be randomly allocated to one of the 3 groups (Control: subjects will continue receiving regular dental care at the clinic, Intervention 1: subjects will continue receiving regular dental care at the clinic and be invited to participate in 2 group based education sessions during a 12 month period, and Intervention 2: subjects will continue receiving regular dental care at the clinic and be invited to participate in an individual-based education and prevention activity over a 18 month period. Randomization will be determined according to a predetermined random sequence, and neither the patient nor the research staff will be aware of the randomization outcome until after the patient has agreed to participate. The OHIP-14 will be used to assess OHRQoL, and self-efficacy scores will be the primary outcomes. Initially, we will assess the differences between the interventions and control using 2-sample t-tests. The main analysis will be based on linear mixed-effects models for repeated measures (using the OHIP 14 and self-efficacy scores as continuous outcome variables) to assess differences between intervention and control groups. Similar analyses will be conducted for secondary outcome measures Statistical significance will be set at p < .05.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 180
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Pennsylvania
    • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
      • Temple Univerity Kornberg School of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Must be 55 years old or older.
2. May be new, regular, emergency patients attending the TUKSoD clinic at Kleinlife or clinics at the Dental School or utilizing medical and social services at Kleinlife who have the intention to become patients of record at the dental clinic.
3. Must be able to speak and understand English.
4. Must be willing to provide consent to participate in the study for himself/herself.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects younger than 55 years old will be excluded from the study.
2. Subjects who do not provide consent for participation will be excluded from the study.
3. Subjects who do not speak and understand English

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control: Standard of Care; Regular dental care under the standard clinic operation
Experimental: Intervention 1: Group-based oral health education; Group based oral health education	Behavioral: Oral Health Education; Group-based oral health education vs Individual-based oral health education using motivational interviewing
Experimental: Intervention 2: Individual-based oral health education; Individual-based motivational interviewing	Behavioral: Oral Health Education; Group-based oral health education vs Individual-based oral health education using motivational interviewing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHIP-14; Slade, 1997)	The oral health related quality of life scale is a 14-item measurement of individuals' perceptions of the social impact of oral conditions on their well-being. This scale evaluates the consequences of oral conditions across dimensions of functional limitation, physical pain, psychological discomfort, physical disability, psychological disability, social disability, and handicap. Items are rated on a 5- point Likert type scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (very often), regarding how frequently impact has been experienced. The total score ranges from 0 to 56; higher OHIP-14 scores indicate greater impact, hence poorer oral-health-related quality of life.	change from baseline to 12 months
Change in Oral Health Self Efficacy (Modified Version of Finlayson, 2007).	Oral health self efficacy uses a 6 item scale and is a measurement of how confident seniors feel about their ability to perform oral hygiene tasks (1) under a lot of stress; (2) being depressed; (3) feeling anxious; (4) feeling that they were too busy; (5) being tired or; (6) being worried about other things in their life. The four response options range from 'very confident' to 'not at all confident'. The possible score range is 0 to 24,with high scores indicating high self-efficacy.	change from baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Oral Health Knowledge (Khanagar, 2014)	Oral health knowledge measurement of the seniors pre and post intervention will be conducted using a list of 15 knowledge statements to which subjects had to report agreement wit the statement (yes), disagreement (no) or don't know. The frequency numbers provided in the results table correspond to correct responses for each individual item.	change from baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Temple University
• Collaborators: Colgate Palmolive; KleinLife
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: MARISOL TELLEZ, PhD, Associate Professor Temple University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): October 15, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): February 28, 2019
• Study Completion (Actual): February 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 28, 2017
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 3, 2017
• First Posted (Actual): October 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 12, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 4, 2020
• Last Verified: May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: elderly; motivational interviewing; oral health
• Other Study ID Numbers: TempleU

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No