A Comparison of Exparel to Bupivacaine in TAP Block for Abdominal Gynecologic Surgery

October 3, 2017 updated by: Heidi Ching, MD, Abington Memorial Hospital

A Pilot Study: A Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Bupivacaine HCl in Transversus Abdominis Planus Block for Abdominal Gynecologic Surgery

This study evaluates the comparison between liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine HCl in Transversus Abdominis Plane blocks for gynecologic surgery on the length of stay in the hospital, total narcotic use, and overall complications rates.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed pilot study is evaluating the use of Exparel ™ in an anesthesia protocol for patients undergoing major lower abdominal gynecologic surgery. Exparel ™ is a formulation of liposomal bupivicaine that is reputed to have a much longer duration of action compares to bupivacaine. Exparel™ has been originally demonstrated to be safe and effective in bunionectomy and hemorrhoidectomy. It has recently gained FDA approval for all surgical site infiltration including TAP (Transversus Abdominis Planus block) blocks. Exparel™ has also been studied in other procedures and demonstrated reduction in opioid use and median length of stay (LOS).

Currently, patients on the gynecologic oncology service undergoing major abdominal surgery are receiving a type of regional anesthesia using bupivacaine HCl known as a TAP block as part of an effort to decrease narcotic use post-operatively and decrease hospital length of stay. Bupivacaine has a known eight to twelve hour duration of action, thus addressing immediate post operative pain. As Exparel™ is anticipated to have a longer duration of action, the purpose of this study is to determine if TAP blocks with Exparel™ have an advantage over standard TAP blocks with bupivacaine HCl in reducing length of hospital stay in a randomized controlled trial. Our hypothesis is that TAP blocks with Exparel™ will result in reduced length of stay contributing to significant hospital cost savings. Secondary outcomes include total narcotic use (hypothesized to be reduced) and overall complication rates (hypothesized to remain unchanged). Given there are no published data on the efficacy and safety of using Exparel™ in open gynecologic abdominal surgery, this will be a pilot study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

128

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients undergoing planned exploratory laparotomy
  • TAP blocks placed after the laparotomy incision is closed, but before the patient is awake, and placed under ultrasound guidance with correct identification of the correct abdominal plane.
  • Consent for TAP block signed by patients preoperatively by anesthesiology

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All pregnant patients
  • All patients under 18 years of age
  • minimally invasive surgery such as laparoscopy or robotic assisted laparoscopy
  • medical contraindications to use of bupivacaine or liposomal bupivacaine such as severe hepatic and/or renal disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bupivacaine HCl in TAP block

When performing a bilateral TAP with Bupivicaine 0.25% and the incision is below the umbilicus: 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine is drawn up and given on each side after identification of planes by the anesthesiologist (need 2 vials).

When performing a bilateral TAP with Bupivicaine 0.25% and the incision extends above the umbilicus: 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine is drawn up and given on each side after identification of planes by the anesthesiologist (need 2 vials). A 3rd vial of 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine will be drawn up and is directly infiltrated into the surgical site (above and below the fascia prior to closure of fascia) extending above the umbilicus by the surgeon.

bupivacaine hydrochloride used in TAP block
Experimental: Liposomal Bupivicaine in TAP block
When performing a bilateral TAP with liposomal bupivacaine and the incision is below the umbilicus: the 20 ml vial of liposomal bupivacaine containing 266 mg, will be diluted with 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (containing 50 mg of bupivacaine) and 20 ml saline (60 ml total). That total volume will be divided into two 30 ml syringes, and each will be used (per side) for the TAP blocks.
liposomal bupivacaine used in TAP block
Other Names:
  • Exparel

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of stay post operatively in hospital
Time Frame: through study completion, expected to be approximately 1 year in total
number of hours patient stays post operatively in hospital
through study completion, expected to be approximately 1 year in total

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
total opioid use post operatively in hospital
Time Frame: through study completion, expected to be approximately 1 year in total
total opioid use in morphine equivalent that patient uses
through study completion, expected to be approximately 1 year in total

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heidi Ching, MD, OB GYN Resident

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gynecologic Cancer

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

3
Subscribe