A Study of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus RFA in the Treatment of Recurrent HCC

October 13, 2017 updated by: Shuguo Zheng, MD, Southwest Hospital, China

A RCT Study of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus RFA in the Treatment of Recurrent HCC

To observe and compare the short-term and long-term oncological outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy and radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma .

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background & Aims: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The 5-year recurrent rate of HCC after first curative resection is 77%~100%. Laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR) has been shown in small retrospective studies to be a safe and effective treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) in selected patients, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been increasingly performed for treating recurrent tumors involving the liver after hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term and long-term outcome of laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of rHCC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Chongqing
      • Chongqing, Chongqing, China, 400038
        • Recruiting
        • Southwest Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Shuguo Zheng, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any gender,18 to 70 years old;
  • Preoperative diagnosis of recurrent HCC clear,liver resection was done previously;
  • No active hepatitis and decompensated cirrhosis;
  • Patient with previous liver resection, maximum diameter ≤5cm single recurrent nodules or 3 nodules in diameter and no more than 3cm,did not infringe the portal vein,hepatic vein and inferior vena cava invasion,lymph node or extrahepatic turn;
  • No tumor rupture or bleeding;
  • Child-Pugh class A or B grade,ICG-R15 <20%;
  • No coagulation disorders,platelet count > 50 × 109 / L and prolonged prothrombin time < 5 seconds;
  • After diagnosis of recurrent HCC,not be including related surgery,radiofrequency ablation (RFA),TACE treatment,no certainty anticancer chemotherapy treatment;supreme absolute contraindications abdominal surgery;
  • Recurrent nodules are not close to intestines,stomach,cholecyst or diaphragm muscle, not close to the first porta hepatis,main vessel and biliary ducts;
  • Patients generally available,heart and lung function can tolerate surgery, abdominal surgery supreme absolute contraindications;
  • Voluntarily participate in the study, voluntarily accept any therapy of two,informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Opposite of the above inclusion criteria;
  • Severe upper abdominal adhesions;
  • Postoperative pathological examination of the bile duct cell or mixed cell carcinoma and pathologically confirmed positive margin;
  • Foreign,Hong Kong,Macao,Taiwan and other regions,estimated postoperative difficult to track,followed up;
  • Nodules proved to be not recurrent HCC during intraoperative exploration, such as:liver metastases of colorectal cancer.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
Improvements in laparoscopic technology mean that LH now has superior short-term efficacy and similar long-term efficacy to open surgery , and LH has shown significant advantages in applications involving recurrent HCC.
180 patients with recurrent HCC with recurrent nodular diameters of less than 5 cm and up to three nodules were randomly divided into LH (n=90) and RFA groups (n=90). Outcomes were monitored and evaluated during the 5-year follow-up period.
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency Ablation
With recent technological advances, RFA has become the most widely investigated new first-line therapeutic option for recurrent HCCs . Numerous large studies have demonstrated the advantages of RFA, which include its ease of use, safety, effectiveness, minimal invasiveness, and minimal morbidity and mortality .
180 patients with recurrent HCC with recurrent nodular diameters of less than 5 cm and up to three nodules were randomly divided into LH (n=90) and RFA groups (n=90). Outcomes were monitored and evaluated during the 5-year follow-up period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival rate
Time Frame: 5 years
follow-up after the surgery every 3 months, to understand statistics 5-year survival.
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraoperative parameters
Time Frame: during the operation
operation time and hepatic inflow occlusion time will be combined to report intraoperative parameters in hour(h).
during the operation

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative complications
Time Frame: Duration hospitalization(an expected average of 7 days)
hepatic failure,hemorrhage,biliary leakage,ascites,intra-abdominal infection,pleural effusion,pulmonary infection,cardiac insufficiency.
Duration hospitalization(an expected average of 7 days)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 13, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SWHZSG007

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrent

Clinical Trials on Laparoscopic Hepatectomy

3
Subscribe