A Study to Assess Effectiveness and Efficiency of VNS Therapy in Patients With Difficult to Treat Depression. (RESTORE-LIFE)

January 25, 2024 updated by: LivaNova

A Global PRospective, Multi-cEnter, ObServational Post-markeT Study tO Assess shoRt, Mid and Long-term Effectiveness and Efficiency of VNS Therapy® as Adjunctive Therapy in reaL-world patIents With diFficult to Treat dEpression.

The primary objective of this study is to assess short, mid and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with difficult to treat depression (such as patients with treatment resistant depression) treated with Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy as adjunctive therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The population under study comprises a real-world patient population with difficult to treat depression: patients diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar disorder with chronic or recurrent depression who fail to achieve an adequate response to standard psychiatric management.

The diagnosis of depression and comorbid disorders will be determined based on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).

A minimum of five hundred (500) patients will be implanted with a VNS Therapy System and up to eighty (80) sites may participate in this study.

Enrollment will take 8 years, based on competitive enrollment. For each subject a baseline visit will occur between 1 and 6 weeks before implant.

Once implanted with the device, subjects will be followed-up for a minimum of 36 months and a maximum of 60 months. The study may stop when the last subject has reached the 36 months follow-up.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Recruiting
        • AKH Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien
        • Contact:
          • Christoph Kraus, Dr.
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Recruiting
        • KU Leuven
        • Contact:
          • Koen Demyttenaere, Prof.
      • Bamberg, Germany
        • Withdrawn
        • Sozialstiftung Bamberg - Klinikum am Bruderwald
      • Bonn, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Bonn
        • Contact:
          • Margaretha Klein, MD
      • Essen, Germany, 45147
        • Recruiting
        • LVR-Hospital Essen
        • Contact:
          • Norbert Scherbaum, Prof.
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
        • Contact:
          • Christine Reif-Leonhard
      • Freiburg, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
        • Contact:
          • Thomas Schläpfer
      • Göttingen, Germany
        • Withdrawn
        • Universitatsmedizin Gottingen
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Withdrawn
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
      • Jena, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Jena
        • Contact:
          • Martin Walter, Prof
      • Köln, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinikum Köln
        • Contact:
          • Fritz-Georg Lehnhardt
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Recruiting
        • Universitätsklinik Leipzig
        • Contact:
          • Maria Strauss, MD
      • Münster, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Münster
        • Contact:
          • Bernhard Baune, Prof.
      • Wilhelmshaven, Germany
        • Recruiting
        • Klinikum Wilhelmshaven
        • Contact:
          • Tom Pieper, Dr.
      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE3 9EJ
        • Recruiting
        • Glenfield Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ganesh Kunjithapatham, Dr.
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • King's College London
        • Contact:
          • Allan Young, Prof.
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
        • Recruiting
        • Academic Psychiatry Wolfson Research Centre
        • Contact:
          • Hamish McAllister-Williams, Prof.
      • Wells, United Kingdom, BA5 1TH
        • Recruiting
        • Mendip HTT / St Andrew's Ward
        • Contact:
          • Samuel Lawton, Dr.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population under study comprises a real-world patient population with difficult to treat depression: patients diagnosed with unipolar or bipolar disorder with chronic or recurrent depression who fail to achieve an adequate response to standard psychiatric management.

The diagnosis of depression and comorbid disorders will be determined based on the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be at least 18 years of age.
  • Have a documented primary diagnosis of chronic (>2 years) or recurrent (2 or more prior episodes) major depressive episode that has not adequately responded to an adequate number of antidepressant treatments, as per local medical standards. This diagnosis must be confirmed using the MINI.
  • Provide written Ethics Committee (EC) or Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA, US only) authorization (as applicable according to local requirements).
  • Currently is receiving at least one antidepressant treatment (i.e., antidepressant drug, maintenance electroconvulsive therapy, or formal psychotherapy including supportive psychotherapy) or mood stabilizing treatment for bipolar patients (such as lithium, anticonvulsants, or atypical antipsychotics).
  • Able and willing to comply with the frequency of (outpatient) clinic visits and to reliably complete all the evaluations as specified in the study protocol.Hence based on the nature of their disease, the following patients should not be included: patients with mental retardation, current severe or significant substance/alcohol abuse, diagnosis of one or more schizophrenia-spectrum or other psychotic disorders, diagnosis of borderline or severe personality disorder as determined by clinical judgment which, in the investigator's opinion, would significantly interfere with subject's participation in the study)

Exclusion Criteria:

There are no exclusion criteria; the investigator should refer to the (local applicable) VNS Therapy Physician's Manual.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Vagal Nerve Simulation (VNS) Therapy
The aim of this study is to include patients with difficult to treat depression from a global "real world" (standard of care) population who are referred for treatment with VNS Therapy.
A VNS Therapy System used for vagus nerve stimulation and consisting of an implantable VNS Therapy generator, lead, and external programming system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary endpoint of this study is response defined as reduction in Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score of at least 50% from baseline to 12 months post implant.
Time Frame: 12 months

MADRS is a 10-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in patients with mood disorders. Each item yields a score of 0 to 6. The overall score ranges from 0 to 60. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression.

A 'Responder' is a subject that achieved ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MADRS total score at the M12 assessment. A 'Non-Responder' is any patient who did not achieve ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in MADRS score at the M12 assessment.

No formal hypothesis testing is presented; all the proposed statistical tests are descriptive in nature.

The Primary endpoint analysis as defined above will be done only on patients that are enrolled while in a major depressive episode (MDE); the cut off point for current MDE at time of implant will be a MADRS score of 20.

For the patients with a MADRS score below 20 at time of enrollment, only the continuous change in MADRS can be described (as the MADRS can only worsen or stay the same).

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of response
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
computed as the difference between the first recorded date post baseline that response is achieved (MADRS reduction from baseline ≥ 50%) and the first date at which MADRS again increased to a level of <40% from baseline.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Change in MADRS
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
Change in MADRS over time
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Cumulative response
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
Cumulative percentage of first-time MADRS responders (MADRS reduction from baseline ≥ 50%) at any post-baseline visit.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Cumulative remission
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
Cumulative percentage of subjects in remission (MADRS ≤9) at any post-baseline visit.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in depression score As measured by the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-SR).
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR) is a 16-item, subject-completed questionnaire of the symptoms of mood and depression. The total score ranges from 0 to 27. A higher QIDS-SR score indicates a more severe depression.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in mania score as measured by the Altman Self-Rating Mania Scale (ASRM)*.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years

*Optional assessments: to be done at selected sites only and based on investigator's clinical judgment to decide which subjects complete them.

The Altman Self-rating Mania Scale (ASRM) is a 5-item self-reported diagnostic scale which can be used to assess the presence and severity manic and hypomanic symptoms, most commonly in patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder. The total score ranges from 0 to 20. A score of 6 or higher indicates a high probability of a manic or hypomanic condition.

through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in Quality of Life as measured by the EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
The EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized 5-item subject completed questionnaire measuring generic health status and quality of life.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in patient function as measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Scale (WPAI)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) is a subject self-reported 6-item questionnaire that measures impairments in work and activities. WPAI outcomes are expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in Quality of Life and patient function as measured by the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF)
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire - Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) is a standardized 16-item, self-report scale to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by the subject during the past week.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in suicidality as measured by item #10 of MADRS.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
Item 10 on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scale assesses suicidal thoughts as representing the feeling that life is not worth living, that a natural death would be welcome, suicidal thoughts and preparations for suicide and is rated from 0 to 6. A score of ≥ 4 ('probably better off dead') is of particular interest.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in suicidality as measured by item #12 of QIDS-SR.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
For Item 12 of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS-SR), the subject assesses any thoughts of death or suicide over the previous 7 days on a 4- point scale; a score of ≥ 2 ('I think of suicide or death several times a week for several minutes') being of interest.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in adjunctive antidepressant pharmacological treatment
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
All adjunctive concomitant antidepressant and psychotropic medications will be collected
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in adjunctive antidepressant non-pharmacological treatment
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
The following adjunctive non-pharmacological treatments will be collected: maintenance electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and psychotherapy
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years
The following adverse events will be collected: serious adverse events, deaths, VNS Therapy related adverse events and device deficiencies.
through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in cognition
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years

As measured by THINC-it® Tool*.

*Optional assessments: to be done at selected sites only and based on investigator's clinical judgment to decide which subjects complete them.

through study completion, an average of 4 years
Changes in anxiety as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment (GAD 7)*.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 years

*Optional assessments: to be done at selected sites only and based on investigator's clinical judgment to decide which subjects complete them.

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) is a 7-item self-reported questionnaire for screening and severity measuring of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). GAD-7 has seven items and uses a normative system of scoring. Assessment is indicated by the total score, which made up by adding together the scores for the scale all seven items.

through study completion, an average of 4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Koen Demyttenaere, Prof., KU Leuven
  • Principal Investigator: Allan Young, Prof., King's College

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Treatment Resistant Depression

Clinical Trials on Vagal Nerve Simulation (VNS) Therapy

3
Subscribe