Diagnostic Tools for Human African Trypanosomiasis Elimination and Clinical Trials: WP2 Passive Case Detection (DiTECT-WP2)

February 18, 2021 updated by: Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement
The study determines the diagnostic performance and cost of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) performed on human African trypanosomiasis clinical suspects in peripheral health centres, whether or not followed by serological and/or molecular tests on dried blood spots done at regional reference centres

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the last decade, the prevalence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) has fallen and HAT has been targeted for elimination. At low disease prevalence, integration of case finding into routine activities of peripheral health centres becomes crucial. However, HAT case detection by the peripheral health system with limited resources requires adapted diagnostic tests and test algorithms.

The objective of the DiTECT-HAT-WP2 study is to determine the diagnostic performance and cost of rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) performed on clinical suspects in peripheral health centres, whether or not followed by serological and/or molecular tests on filter paper done at regional reference centres.

The DiTECT-HAT-WP2 study will be conducted in centres for diagnosis and treatment and in sites for serological screening in Guinea, Côte d'Ivoire and DR Congo. In these centres and sites, clinical suspects will be tested with several commercially available RDTs for HAT. Clinical suspects with at least 1 RDT positive result, will 1° undergo parasitological examination and 2° blood collection on filter paper for reference analysis in trypanolysis, LAMP, ELISA and real-time PCR in the regional reference laboratory. If the reference laboratory tests and parasitological examinations are all negative, the suspect is informed and considered free of HAT. If at least 1 reference test is positive, parasitological examinations are repeated at least twice at three months interval, unless trypanosomes are detected. In order to assess the sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Values and Negative Predictive Values of each assay in these multiple populations, the data from the multiple assays in the 3 countries will be used in a Bayesian formulation of the Hui-Walter latent class model, to estimate the assay performances in the absence of a gold standard. As we will collect full cost information for the different algorithms, we will, in addition to estimating the diagnostic effectiveness of the assay, be able to estimate the cost of each assay in each setting, and rank this jointly with assay performance.

The results will enable us to propose cost-effective test algorithms to detect HAT, adapted to peripheral health centres. Algorithms with high positive predictive values might allow test-and-treat scenarios without the need for complicated parasitological confirmations, once safe oral easy to use drugs become available to treat HAT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10700

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kinshasa, Congo, The Democratic Republic of the
        • Programme Nationale de Lutte contre la trypanosomiase humaine Africaine
      • Bouaké, Côte D'Ivoire
        • Institut Pierre Richet, Institut National de Santé Publique
      • Conakry, Guinea
        • Programme Nationale de Lutte contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine, Ministère de Santé, Division Prévention et Lutte contre la Maladie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Visit of or residence in a HAT endemic area
  • Clinical suspicion of HAT based on: Recurrent fever not responding to anti-malarial medication; or Headache for a long duration (>14 days); or presence of swollen lymph nodes in the neck; or Important weight loss; or Weakness; or Important scratching; or Amenorrhea, abortion(s), or sterility; or Coma; or Psychiatric problems (aggressiveness, apathy, mental confusion, increasing unusual hilarity, ...); or Sleep disruption (nocturnal insomnia and excessive diurnal sleeping); or Motor abnormalities (convulsions, abnormal movements, shaking, walking difficulties); or Speech disorders.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously treated for HAT (irrespective of time elapsed since treatment)
  • No informed consent
  • < 4 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Clinical suspect
Diagnostic tests: Rapid diagnostic test (RDT); Serological and molecular tests on DBS
The 4 rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) will be carried out on fresh blood from clinical suspects. Only those subjects that are positive in at least 1 RDT will 1) undergo tests on DBS (immune trypanolysis, ELISA and DNA detection); 2) undergo parasitological confirmation (reference standard) at inclusion.
Other Names:
  • rHAT Sero-Strip (Coris Bioconcept, Belgium)
  • SD Bioline HAT 1.0 (Standard Diagnostics Korea)
  • HAT Sero-K-Set (Coris Bioconcept, Belgium)
  • SD Bioline HAT 2.0 (Standard Diagnostics Korea)
Serological and molecular reference tests on dried blood spots (DBS) are carried out on RDT positive clinical suspects, which also undergo parasitological examination at inclusion (reference standard). If at least one of the serological or molecular reference tests on dried blood spots is positive, parasitological examination is repeated 3 and 6 months after inclusion. The combined results of parasitological examinations (at inclusion and if applicable at 3 and 6 months) serve as reference standard
Other Names:
  • Immune trypanolysis: presence of antibodies
  • ELISA: on native LiTat 1.3 + LiTat 1.5 VSG
  • Loopamp T. brucei Detection Kit (Eiken)
  • RT-PCR: Trypanozoon 18S, Tbg TgsGP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity for HAT diagnosis of RDT, RDT combinations, algorithms of RDT and serological and/or molecular tests on HAT clinical suspects
Time Frame: 6 months

Index tests: 4 RDTs on fresh blood, and for RDT positives also immune trypanolysis on DBS, ELISA on DBS, LAMP on DBS, RT-PCR on DBS.

Reference standard: for RDT positives only: combined results of parasitological examination at inclusion and if one of tests on DBS positive, at 3 and 6 months. Subjects negative in all RDTs are considered HAT negative

6 months
Specificity for HAT diagnosis of RDT, RDT combinations, algorithms of RDT and serological and/or molecular tests on HAT clinical suspects
Time Frame: 6 months

Index tests: 4 RDTs on fresh blood, and for RDT positives also immune trypanolysis on DBS, ELISA on DBS, LAMP on DBS, RT-PCR on DBS.

Reference standard: for RDT positives only: combined results of parasitological examination at inclusion and if one of tests on DBS positive, at 3 and 6 months. Subjects negative in all RDTs are considered HAT negative.

6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trypanosoma Brucei Gambiense; Infection

Clinical Trials on Rapid diagnostic test (RDT)

3
Subscribe