The Benefit of Structured Triage of Patients in the Primary Health Care Seeking Care for Low Back Pain

December 20, 2017 updated by: FoU Center Spenshult
This study aims to investigate if a low back pain screening tool is helpful for the caregivers to direct the rehabilitation in a more efficient way, at an earlier stage. Primary Health care centers in the municipality of Halmstad, Sweden will be enrolled to participate in the study as either "Control" or "intervention". The primary Health care centers who are enrolled taking part in the intervention, will use the provided screening tool when taking care of patients seeking care for low back pain. Scorings from the screening tool will "label" the patients as one of Three pre-defined risk levels. The caregiver will then use the provided risk level when deciding how to proceed the rehabilitation. Based on the risk level identified, the patient is directed to one of three levels of treatments - including simple advice; physiotherapy; or multimodal rehabilitation. The screening tool is used as a complement to the examination, allowing the physiotherapist /GP to decide how to proceed with rehabilitation using the back screening tool, together with Clinical examinations. The Control Group consists of patients recruited when seeking care for back pain at a Primary Health Care service who has been randomly selected as "Control". The care givers at the Control primary Health care will conduct as usual, not using the back pain screening tool in their Clinical examinations.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Halmstad, Sweden, 30274
        • Recruiting
        • FoUSpenshult
        • Contact:
          • Emma Haglund, PhD
          • Phone Number: 046-35-220202

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 67 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Seeking care for low back pain at any of the included primary Health care.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Red flags

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Back pain screening group
Includes the Group of patients where the care giver has used the back pain screening tests studied in order to judge how to proceed with rehabilitation, which level of rehabilitation is appropriate.
The care giver use the screening tool in order to score the back patient to three levels of risk. For each level of risk, one suggested type of care is provided; 1) simple advise; 2) physiotherapy; 3) multimodal rehabilitation. highest risk level includes multimodal intervention.
No Intervention: treatment as usual
The Group get treatment as usual, where the care giver base the rehabilitation plan without taking the scorings from the screening tool into consideration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of physiotherapy treatments
Time Frame: 4 months after inclusion
Number of treatments given by physiotherapist
4 months after inclusion
Number of physiotherapy treatments
Time Frame: 12 months after inclusion
Number of treatments given by physiotherapist
12 months after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
back pain questionnaire - The Keele STarT Back Screening Tool
Time Frame: 4 months after inclusion
The Keele STarT Back Screening Tool, is a prognostic tool helping clinicians identify risk factors for persistent back pain. 9 questions. Total score range from 0 to 9 (best- to worse)
4 months after inclusion
back pain questionnaire - The Keele STarT Back Screening Tool
Time Frame: 12 months after inclusion
The Keele STarT Back Screening Tool, is a prognostic tool helping clinicians identify risk factors for persistent back pain. 9 questions. Total score range from 0 to 9 (best- to worse)
12 months after inclusion
back pain questionnaire - Pain distribution
Time Frame: 4 months after inclusion
Pain distribution (numbers of marked regions and location) will be measured by a pain mannequin divided into 18 body regions.The patients mark each region with pain lasting more than three months during the past 12 months. The total number of regions giving a total score 0-18 (few to several regions, best- to worse).
4 months after inclusion
back pain questionnaire - Pain distribution
Time Frame: 12 months after inclusion
Pain distribution (numbers of marked regions and location) will be measured by a pain mannequin divided into 18 body regions.The patients mark each region with pain lasting more than three months during the past 12 months. The total number of regions giving a total score 0-18 (few to several regions, best- to worse).
12 months after inclusion
back pain questionnaire - The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: 4 months after inclusion
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire assess self-rated physical disability Total score range from 0-24 (best to worse disability)
4 months after inclusion
back pain questionnaire - The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time Frame: 12 months after inclusion
The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire assess self-rated physical disability Total score range from 0-24 (best to worse disability)
12 months after inclusion
work ability - Work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (WPAI)
Time Frame: 4 months after inclusion
Work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (WPAI) with 6 questions assessing the impact of the disease on work and other daily activities during the previous 7 days (absenteeism, presenteeism, impaired activities outside work, and overall work impairment). Each component is expressed as percentage of impairment due to the disease (0-100%) where a higher percentage indicates a greater reduction.
4 months after inclusion
work ability - Work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (WPAI)
Time Frame: 12 months after inclusion
Work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire (WPAI) with 6 questions assessing the impact of the disease on work and other daily activities during the previous 7 days (absenteeism, presenteeism, impaired activities outside work, and overall work impairment). Each component is expressed as percentage of impairment due to the disease (0-100%) where a higher percentage indicates a greater reduction.
12 months after inclusion
work ability - The work ability index (WAI)
Time Frame: 4 months after inclusion
The work ability index (WAI) single-item question concerned the item "current work ability compared with the lifetime best", with a possible score of 0 ("completely unable to work") to 10 ("work ability at its best")
4 months after inclusion
work ability - The work ability index (WAI)
Time Frame: 12 months after inclusion
The work ability index (WAI) single-item question concerned the item "current work ability compared with the lifetime best", with a possible score of 0 ("completely unable to work") to 10 ("work ability at its best")
12 months after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Stefan Bergman, PhD, FoU Center Spenshult

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Low back pain_RCT_2017

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Back pain screening test

3
Subscribe