The Efficacy of Different Vitamin D Supplementation Delivery Methods

March 12, 2018 updated by: Matthew Wyon, University of Wolverhampton

The Efficacy of Different Vitamin D Supplementation Delivery Methods on Serum 25(OH)D in Humans a Randomised Double-blind Placebo Trial

To test the efficacy of different vitamin D delivery methods on serum 25(OH)D. Participants randomly assigned to one of seven groups - three placebo groups and 4 active supplement groups receiving 100,000IU vitamin D3

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Various delivery methods of vitamin D supplementation are available to consumers but there have been no studies providing evidence of whether one delivery method is superior to others. The researchers wanted to compare the delivery of 100,000IU vitamin D3 by three methods on serum 25(OH)D levels. Two methods of oral supplementation (pill [prolonged release] and liquid [immediate release]), and delivery through the skin (with and without a penetrator enhancer. Placebo groups were pill, oral liquid and skin applied oil

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

62

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • West Midlands
      • Walsall, West Midlands, United Kingdom, WS1 3BD
        • University of Wolverhampton

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 43 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy, female

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any participant that was taking vitamin supplementation, had a skin condition that would prevent them from applying oil to their skin or were taking, or had been taking in the past 6-months, oestrogen based contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Vitamin D3 pill
100 pills = 100,000IU + Dicalcium phosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, silicium dioxide, magnesium stearate
100,000IU
Dicalcium phosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, silicium dioxide, magnesium stearate
Placebo Comparator: Pill placebo
100 pills = Dicalcium phosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, silicium dioxide, magnesium stearate
Dicalcium phosphate, microcrystalline cellulose, silicium dioxide, magnesium stearate
Experimental: Vitamin D3 oral liquid
100 drops = 100,000IU in orange syrup
100,000IU
100 drops orange syrup
Placebo Comparator: Oral liquid placebo
100 drops orange syrup
100 drops orange syrup
Experimental: Skin oil + Vitamin D3 + penetrator
100,000IU + mineral oil+ Tangerine essential oil (10ml)
100,000IU
Paraffinum Liquidum,Isopropyl Palmitate,Parfum
Tangerine essential oil (10ml)
Experimental: Skin oil + Vitamin D3
100,000IU + mineral oil
100,000IU
Paraffinum Liquidum,Isopropyl Palmitate,Parfum
Placebo Comparator: Skin oil placebo
Skin application: 100ml of mineral oil coloured with food colourant to match active oil sample
Paraffinum Liquidum,Isopropyl Palmitate,Parfum

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum 25(OH)D
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Changes in serum 25(OH)D levels
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 2, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitamin D Deficiency

Clinical Trials on vitamin D3

3
Subscribe