A Trial of TTA-121 on Autism Spectrum Disorder

December 18, 2019 updated by: Hidenori Yamasue, M.D., Ph.D., Hamamatsu University

An Early Phase II Trial for Efficacy and Safety of TTA-121 on Autism Spectrum Disorder

To test efficacy and safety of a novel nasal spray of oxytocin on social deifies in autism spectrum disorder, and To compare effect sizes of different doses

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

144

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shizuoka
      • Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan, 431-3192
        • Hamamatsu University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 54 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-V with score exceeding the cut-off value of 10 for qualitative abnormalities in social reciprocity on Autism Diagnostic Interview Revised (ADIR)
  2. Full scale Intelligent quotient above 80 as measured using the Wechsler Adult Intelligent Scale-III
  3. Written informed consent for participating the trial

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of bipolar disorder or schizophrenia spectrum disorder
  2. Primary diagnosis of depressive disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, anxiety disorders, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, dissociative disorders, somatic symptom and related disorders, or neurodevelopmental disorders other than autism spectr um disorder
  3. Instability in symptoms of comorbid mental disorders such as depressive disorders or anxiety disorders
  4. History of changes in medication or doses of psychotropics within one month before registration
  5. Current treatment with more than one psychotropics
  6. History of hyper-sensitivity to oxytocin
  7. History of seizures or traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness for longer than 5 minutes
  8. History of alcohol-related disorders, substance abuse, or addiction
  9. Family history of male breast cancer
  10. Subject who has severe complications
  11. Known hypersensitivity to some drugs and foods
  12. Subject who is not able to consent contraception during study period
  13. Participation in another registration clinical trial and administration of investigational drug during 120 days before informed consent
  14. Other Subjects whom a lead investigator or the patient's primary physician deems are not appropriate for this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Low dose once per day and placebo

Four weeks administrations of TTA-121 3U once per day in morning and placebo once per day in evening.

After four weeks washout, four weeks administrations of placebo twice per day in morning and evening.

A nove intranasal spray of oxytocin and placebo
Other: Low dose twice per day and placebo
Four weeks administrations of TTA-121 3U twice per day in morning and evening. After four weeks washout, four weeks administrations of placebo twice per day in morning and evening.
A nove intranasal spray of oxytocin and placebo
Other: High dose once per day and placebo

Four weeks administrations of TTA-121 10U once per day in morning and placebo once per day in evening.

After four weeks washout, four weeks administrations of placebo twice per day in morning and evening.

A nove intranasal spray of oxytocin and placebo
Other: High dose twice per day and placebo
Four weeks administrations of TTA-121 10U twice per day in morning and evening. After four weeks washout, four weeks administrations of placebo twice per day in morning and evening.
A nove intranasal spray of oxytocin and placebo
Other: Placebo and low dose once per day
Four weeks administrations of placebo twice per day in morning and evening. After four weeks washout, four weeks administrations of TTA-121 3U once per day in morning and placebo once per day in evening.
A nove intranasal spray of oxytocin and placebo
Other: Placebo and low dose twice per day
Four weeks administrations of placebo twice per day in morning and evening. After four weeks washout, four weeks administrations of TTA-121 3U twice per day in morning and evening.
A nove intranasal spray of oxytocin and placebo
Other: Placebo and high dose once per day
Four weeks administrations of placebo twice per day in morning and evening. After four weeks washout, four weeks administrations of TTA-121 10U once per day in morning and placebo once per day in evening.
A nove intranasal spray of oxytocin and placebo
Other: Placebo and high dose twice per day
Four weeks administrations of placebo twice per day in morning and evening. After four weeks washout, four weeks administrations of TTA-121 10U twice per day in morning and evening.
A nove intranasal spray of oxytocin and placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy on autism spectrum social core symptom assessed by social reciprocity score on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Changes in social reciprocity score (range: 0-14, Higher value represent a worth outcome) on Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4 between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy on autism spectrum core symptom assessed by communication score on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Changes in communication score (range: 0-8, Higher value represent a worth outcome) on Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4 between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Efficacy on autism spectrum core symptom assessed by repetitive and restricted behavior score on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Changes in repetitive and restricted behavior score (range: 0-10, Higher value represent a worth outcome) on Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4 between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Efficacy on autism spectrum core symptom assessed by revised algorithm score of social affect on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Changes in revised algorithm score of social affect (range: 0-20, Higher value represent a worth outcome) on Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4 between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Efficacy on autism spectrum core symptom assessed by revised algorithm of repetitive and restricted behavior score on the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Changes in revised algorithm of repetitive and restricted behavior score (range: 0-10, Higher value represent a worth outcome) on Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule module 4 between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Efficacy assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was assessed within 100 min after the last drug administration
Changes in Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (range: 1-7, Higher value represent a worse outcome) between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was assessed within 100 min after the last drug administration
Efficacy assessed by Clinical Global Impression-Severity
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was assessed within 100 min after the last drug administration
Changes in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (range: 1-7, Higher value represent a worse outcome) between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was assessed within 100 min after the last drug administration
Efficacy assessed by Global Assessment of Functioning
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was assessed within 100 min after the last drug administration
Changes in Global Assessment of Functioning (range: 1-100, Higher value represent a better outcome) between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was assessed within 100 min after the last drug administration
Efficacy assessed by gaze fixation time on social region
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 60 min after the last drug administration
Changes in gaze fixation time on social region during being talked between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 60 min after the last drug administration
Efficacy assessed by quantitative analysis of facial expression
Time Frame: At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration
Changes in quantitative measure of facial expression on videos recorded during ADOS administration between baseline and endpoint of each administration period
At baseline, which was before and on the same day as the first administration, and at endpoint, which was started approximately 15 min after the last drug administration

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hidenori Yamasue, MD, PhD, Department of Psychiatry, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 16, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on TTA-121

3
Subscribe