Noninferiority Trial of MitraClip Implantation Strategies: 1 Clip vs. 2 Clips in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation (One-Plus-One)

January 2, 2019 updated by: Asklepios proresearch

Noninferiority Trial of MitraClip Implantation Strategies: 1 Clip vs. 2 Clips in Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation (One-Plus-One)

Implantation of the MitraClip has become the most frequently used percutaneous technique to treat significant (grade 3+ or 4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) in elderly patients deemed inoperable or at high surgical risk. In Europe, about two-thirds of patients treated with the MitraClip suffer from MR of functional origin secondary to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. At present, there is debate among operators on whether stabilizing/supporting a single adequately implanted clip with a second clip is beneficial for patients with functional MR.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Implantation of the MitraClip has become the most frequently used percutaneous technique to treat significant (grade 3+ or 4+) mitral regurgitation (MR) in elderly patients deemed inoperable or at high surgical risk. In Europe, about two-thirds of patients treated with the MitraClip suffer from MR of functional origin secondary to ischemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. At present, there is debate among operators on whether stabilizing/supporting a single adequately implanted clip with a second clip is beneficial for patients with functional MR.

Purpose To demonstrate the noninferiority of a 1-clip strategy vs. a 2-clip strategy of MitraClip implantation, when the second clip in the 2-clip study arm is implanted for stabilizing/supporting purposes.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of a structural abnormality of the mitral valve giving rise to MR.
  • MR severity of US grade 3+ or 4+ of central or noncentral origin
  • Patient must consent to randomization in the hybrid operating theater upon successful implantation of a single MitraClip. Written informed consent must be provided prior to the MitraClip procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with primary regurgitation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: One CLIP
Implantation of single MitraClip
Device to approximate the mitral valve leaflets
Active Comparator: Two CLIPs
Implantation of second MitraClip (after successful Implantation of single MitraClip)
Device to approximate the mitral valve leaflets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of number of participants who died death within one year
Time Frame: 1 year
death
1 year
Evaluation of number of rehospitalizations due to heart failure among patients receiving one or two clips
Time Frame: 1 year
heart failure rehospitalization
1 year
Evaluation of number of participants with recurrent regurgitation within one year
Time Frame: 1 year
recurrence of mitral regurgitation (>grade 2+ at 1 year)
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
death
Time Frame: 1 year
freedom from death (1-year)
1 year
heart failure
Time Frame: 1 year
freedom from heart failure (1-year)
1 year
rehospitalization
Time Frame: 1-year
rehospitalization
1-year
regurgitation
Time Frame: 1-year
freedom from recurrence of mitral regurgitation (>2+; 1-year)
1-year
success rate
Time Frame: 1-year
procedural success rate in 2-clip arm
1-year
procedure duration
Time Frame: 1-year
procedure duration
1-year
total device time
Time Frame: 1-year
total device time
1-year
fluoroscopy time
Time Frame: 1-year
fluoroscopy time
1-year
contrast volume
Time Frame: 1-year
contrast volume
1-year
complications
Time Frame: 1-year
periprocedural (30-day) complications
1-year
echocardiographic variables
Time Frame: 1-year
The following echocardiographic variables will be assessed by 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography at 12 months: Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic diameter and volume; LV end-systolic diameter and volume; LV ejection fraction; LV outflow tract diameter and velocity time integral in LV outflow tract (to calculate forward stroke volume).
1-year
changes in echocardiographic variables
Time Frame: 1-year
Changes from baseline to 12 months in echocardiographically assessed (at both time points) LV end-diastolic diameter and volume; LV end-systolic diameter and volume; LV ejection fraction; and forward stroke volume.
1-year
NYHA
Time Frame: 1-year
NYHA functional class
1-year
6-minutes walk
Time Frame: 1-year
6-minutes walk distance
1-year
quality of life
Time Frame: 1-year
Assessment of the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) quality-of-life score. The questionnaire consists of 21 quality-of-life questions to be answered by the patient on a grading scale of 0 (best) to 5 (worst). Thus, the overall MLHFQ score ranges from 0 to 105.
1-year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karl-Heinz Kuck, MD, PHD, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, Dept. of Cardiology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation Functional

Clinical Trials on MitraClip implantation

3
Subscribe