Virtual Reality for Chronic Neuropathic Pain

Immersive Virtual Reality for Chronic Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Feasibility Trial

The investigators hypothesize that SCI patients using immersive IVR training will show improved reduction of neuropathic pain that will outlast the training sessions and transfers into daily life.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Neuropathic Pain; Spinal Cord Injuries
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: Immersive Virtual Reality (Gear VR)

Detailed Description

Neuropathic pain (NP) affects 40 to 70% of people with SCI and is a very disabling clinical condition. The definitions of NP as well as its neurophysiology are widely discussed in the literature. Many treatment options have been offered, but provide limited effects, leaving people with SCI with a reduced quality of life.

Pain is a very complex experience that depends strongly on cognitive, emotional, and educational influences. Despite intensive investigations, the cause of neuropathic pain often remains unknown. A careful assessment of the pain including the use of tools to objectively measure pain will help with the diagnosis and the quantification of the damage. These tools include: 1) Laboratory testing that uses quantitative tests and measures objective responses in neurophysiology, sensory evoked potentials...etc.; 2) Quantitative sensory testing, that tests the perception of pain in response to external stimuli; 3) Bedside examination: physicians assessment on location, quality and intensity of pain; 4) Pain questionnaires, depending entirely on the subject's self-reported experience.

When spinal cord injury occurs, the spinal somatosensory circuit is thought to generate aberrant nociceptive impulses that the brain interprets as pain. Thalamic circuits may also serve as amplifiers of nociceptive signals. Sensory deafferentation after injury to the spinal cord produces extensive and long-lasting reorganization of the cortical and subcortical sensory maps. It has been suggested that pain and phantom limb sensations are the consequence of those cortical plasticity change. Therefore, strategies aimed at reversing or modulating the somatosensory neural reorganization may be valuable alternative approaches to neuropathic pain. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is an emerging approach to the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions in SCI. Despite promising initial studies, IVR therapy has not yet been made widely available to individuals with SCI, because equipment is expensive and can be difficult for clinicians to use, especially those with limited experience with technology. However, with the development of 'plug and play', low-cost IVR devices such as the Oculus Rift, Gear VR and Google Cardboard, IVR no longer requires such specific technical knowledge. As a result, IVR is now a feasible and affordable treatment option for neuropathic pain.

The investigators believe that IVR neurorehabilitation exploits the idea of inducing activation in action observation, motor imagery, and processing systems, which in turn, should activate downstream cortical areas involved in movement and motor imagery. Also, perturbations of the somatosensory system associated with central pain can be reversed or modulated by employing motor imagery and related task execution combined with visual illusions. The investigators hypothesize that SCI patients using immersive IVR training will show improved reduction of neuropathic pain that will outlast the training sessions and transfers into daily life.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 40
• Phase: Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • New York
    • White Plains, New York, United States, 10605
      • Burke Medical Research Institute

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Presence of chronic neuropathic pain at or below SCI level for at least 6 months following trauma or disease of the spinal cord;
• A pain intensity of at least 4 out of 10 in the numerical rating scale (NRS) in the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) test at both screening (baseline) and randomization (pre-evaluation);
• Stable pharmacological treatment for at least 2 weeks prior to the study and throughout the trial;
• Incomplete lesion (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale, AIS B, C or D; B= motor complete, sensory incomplete; C= sensorimotor incomplete with an average strength of the muscles below the level of the lesion <3, D= sensorimotor incomplete with average muscle strength >3);
• Cervical level of lesion (C2 to T1) with presence of pain in the upper extremities

Exclusion Criteria:

• Presence of severe pain of other origin, such as musculoskeletal pain
• Psychiatric or other neurological disorders
• Head injuries causing cognitive or visual impairment
• Severe vertigo
• Presence of potential risk factors for brain stimulation (TMS): history of seizures, presence of surgically implanted foreign bodies such as a pacemaker, metal plate in the skull, and metal inside the skull;
• Medically unstable

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Somatic IVR (s-IVR); This group will use an Immersive Virtual Reality (Gear VR) device to focus on encouraging disassociation between pain and visualization and movement of the affected limbs. Subjects in this group will be exposed to an IVR environment that cycles them through a series of stretching and mobility exercises for the affected limbs bilaterally.	Device: Immersive Virtual Reality (Gear VR); Immersing the user in a total visual environment.
Active Comparator: Distractive IVR (d-IVR); This group will use an Immersive Virtual Reality (Gear VR) device to focus on distracting the subject from the pain. Subjects in this group will be exposed to a variety of engaging landscape IVR environments, without the ability to visualize their own body.	Device: Immersive Virtual Reality (Gear VR); Immersing the user in a total visual environment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Change in Neuropathic Pain Scale	It includes 11 items, assessing global pain intensity, unpleasantness, and one item which allows the patient to describe the temporal aspects of their pain and its qualities in their own words. The remaining 8 items assess specific NP qualities: "Sharp," "Hot," "Dull," "Cold," "Sensitive," "Itchy," "Deep," and "Surface." This is a sensitive tool for measuring changes in neuropathic pain after a therapeutic intervention.	Baseline compared with immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Upper Extremity Motor Score (UEMS)	Clinical measure of motor strength	Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up
Modified Ashworth Scale	Measure of spasticity scored from 1 (no increase in tone) to 4 (rigid limb)	Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III)	Measures patient's ability to complete activities of daily living	Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up
Beck Depression Inventory	Self-report measuring characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression	Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up
Immersive Tendencies Questionnaire (ITQ)	Measures an individual's sense of engagement and involvement in an activity	Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up
The Presence Questionnaire	Measure of presence (ex: selective attention, involvement, immersive response, etc)	Baseline, post-intervention, and 1 month follow up
Patient's Global Impression of Change	Evaluates both motor function and pain with no change (score 0-1), minimally improved (score 2-3), much improved (score 4-5), and very much improved (score 6-7).	Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation	Assess brain reorganization, output and responsiveness as determined by motor threshold, motor evoked potential and amplitude of response.	Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 1 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Kathleen Friel
• Investigators: Study Director: Kathleen Friel, PhD, Burke Medical Research Institute

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): July 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (Actual): December 1, 2017
• Study Completion (Anticipated): December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: May 17, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 9, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): July 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 10, 2019
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 8, 2019
• Last Verified: July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Central Nervous System Diseases; Nervous System Diseases; Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Wounds and Injuries; Neuromuscular Diseases; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Trauma, Nervous System; Spinal Cord Diseases; Neuralgia; Spinal Cord Injuries
• Other Study ID Numbers: BRC527

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No
• IPD Plan Description: There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers at this time.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No