- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03595748
Peer Mentorship to Improve Outcomes in Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis
Study Overview
Detailed Description
The overarching goal of this research is to improve End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) related morbidity and mortality. The medical care of patients with ESRD is highly complex and enormously expensive. Hospitalizations drive up to 40% of the cost for ESRD care. Cardiovascular disease and infections account for over 50% of ESRD-related hospitalizations and contribute to disproportionate mortality in this patient population. This study tests the implementation and impact on hospitalization outcomes of a peer mentor led intervention designed to increase effective self-management in patients receiving hemodialysis, in a real-world setting with high potential for widespread dissemination.
Patients receiving hemodialysis who can self-manage their fluid status effectively, are adherent to their dialysis schedule and to their dietary plan are hospitalized less frequently and have lower morbidity and mortality than patients who are less adherent. However, numerous impediments to dialysis self-management exist including facility, physician and patient-level barriers. The following are patient-level barriers to optimal self-management: 1) poor knowledge about the rationale and metrics of estimated dry weight (EDW), 2) poor knowledge about the metrics of urea clearance and nutritional parameters, 3) under-utilization of available hours for unscheduled dialysis, and 4) low self-efficacy leading to non-adherent schedule and dietary behaviors. Dialysis self-management education is often not successful in improving patients' skills. Educational tools from dialysis facilities and providers are didactic, have medical jargon and lack concrete steps to mitigate patient visits to emergency departments (ED) and subsequent hospitalizations. A culturally sensitive, easy to understand educational program that can increase hemodialysis self-management is critically needed.
Peer mentorship has been used effectively to enhance self-efficacy and self-management behaviors in patients with chronic disease. A single study of peer mentorship for ESRD patients found that peer mentors improved adherence and satisfaction with care among mentees. This strategy has high potential to improve the factors that drive hospitalizations among this high-risk patient group. The goal of this research is to implement a peer mentor training program to increase patients' knowledge about the metrics of hemodialysis, enhance self-management to meet EDW, nutritional and adherence goals, and to enhance self-efficacy in mentees. The peer-mentor intervention is based on the information, motivation, behavior (IMB) model of health behavior and the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program. There will be a didactic component to increase knowledge, and a semi-structured component to increase perception of social support. The investigators will test the feasibility of implementation of this program and the efficacy of it to reduce hospitalizations in a pragmatic trial comparing the peer mentor intervention on mentees to a control group assigned to usual care. The study will also test the intervention at two geographically diverse locations (Bronx, NY and Nashville, TN) to provide evidence of its scalability and acceptability in different patient populations. The study hypothesis states: a structured peer mentor telephone intervention will be more effective than usual care in increasing hemodialysis related knowledge, self-management adherent behaviors and in decreasing ED visits and hospitalizations in ESRD.
Specific Aim 1: To evaluate the effects of a 3-month semi-structured and telephone delivered peer mentor intervention on a composite of ED visits and hospitalizations in 100 high risk patients on hemodialysis randomized to peer mentor intervention as compared to 100 high risk patients on hemodialysis assigned to usual care.
- Secondary outcomes include: 1) dialysis adherence (mean weekly minutes of dialysis), 2) mean monthly inter-dialytic weight gain (IDWG), and 3) mean monthly albumin levels, in the intervention mentees as compared to the controls.
- To compare by group patient dialysis knowledge, self-efficacy and social support.
Specific Aim 2: To test the feasibility of a peer training program focused on teaching self-management skills focused on adherence, dietary and fluid management, in dialysis facilities.
- To test the feasibility of a training program conducted in 7 dialysis facilities the investigators will conduct peer training of 20 recruited mentors (10 in New York and 10 in Nashville), using a semi-structured curriculum taught in 4 sets of 2-hour sessions, over 4 weeks per facility.
- To test the fidelity of the curriculum training the investigators will use attendance records, content analysis, pre- and post-knowledge assessments and course evaluations.
This pragmatic trial will test the effects and implementation of a low cost, educational, telephone-based, peer-mentor intervention to increase self-management behaviors of patients receiving hemodialysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center
-
-
Tennessee
-
Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >21 years
One of the following:
- One or more hospitalizations or ED visits in the previous month
- >1 missed treatment or 2 shortened dialysis treatments in the last month
- use of catheter as only access
- >4% intradialytic weight gain
- serum albumin less than 3.5 in the last month
- Incident dialysis patient
- Willing to give informed consent and to be randomized and to allow a telephone intervention with mentors
- Speaks Spanish or English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Intellectual disability/ active mental illness or active substance abuse
- less than a 6- month life expectancy
- not a patient at one of the participating dialysis facilities
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Peer mentorship intervention
This arm of mentees will be assigned to weekly telephone calls with a matched mentor over a period of 3 months.
|
Participants randomized to this arm of the study will speak with their dialysis peer mentor once a week about fluid intake and adherence to dialysis.
|
No Intervention: Usual Care
This arm of mentees will not get a telephone intervention by an assigned mentee
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of ED visits and Hospitalizations
Time Frame: 12 or 18 months
|
Composite outcome
|
12 or 18 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Rate of missed or cut dialysis treatments
Time Frame: 12 or 18 months
|
Mean weekly missed minutes of dialysis treatments by intervention mentees as compared to control mentees during the intervention and follow-up periods
|
12 or 18 months
|
Mean monthly interdialytic weight gain in intervention mentees as compared to control mentees during the intervention and follow-up periods
Time Frame: 12 or 18 months
|
Mean monthly amount of changed fluid weight in-between dialysis treatments by intervention mentees as compared to control mentees during intervention and follow-up periods.
|
12 or 18 months
|
Mean monthly albumin levels
Time Frame: 12 or 18 months
|
The monthly albumin levels in intervention mentees as compared to control mentees during intervention and follow-up periods.
|
12 or 18 months
|
Efficacy of intervention to change dialysis knowledge in mentees
Time Frame: 3 months (immediately post intervention) and 12 or 18 months
|
The scores on Chronic Hemodialysis Knowledge Survey (CHeKS) and knowledge assessments in mentees assigned to intervention as compared mentees assigned to control. CHeKS: percent correct out of a total of 23 questions |
3 months (immediately post intervention) and 12 or 18 months
|
Efficacy of intervention to change curriculum specific dialysis knowledge in mentees
Time Frame: 3 months (immediately post intervention) and 12 or 18 months
|
The scores on Chronic Hemodialysis Knowledge Survey (CHeKS) plus knowledge assessments in mentees assigned to intervention as compared mentees assigned to control. CHeKS Plus: percent correct out of a total of 8 questions |
3 months (immediately post intervention) and 12 or 18 months
|
Efficacy of intervention to change quality of life in intervention mentees as compared to control mentees
Time Frame: At 3 months (immeditely post intervention) and 12 or 18 months.
|
The scores on SF36 Health Survey(36 item short form health survey by RAND) in mentees assigned to intervention as compared to control mentees. For the SF-36 Health Survey, the scoring varies depending on question with some questions having a scale from 1-6 and others having a scale from 1-3. All items are scored so a high score defines a more favorable health state.(https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html) |
At 3 months (immeditely post intervention) and 12 or 18 months.
|
Efficacy of intervention to change self-efficacy by intervention mentees as compared to usual care mentees
Time Frame: At 3 months and 12 or 18 months.
|
Scores on "Perceived Dialysis Self Management Scale(PKDSMS)" and Kidney "Disease Self Management Behavioral Index(KDBI)" in mentees assigned to intervention as compared to mentees assigned to control. PKDSMS: scores on a scale from 1 to 5 for each of 8 items, with 1 representing "strongly agree" to 5 representing "strongly disagree. KDBI: scores on a scale of 1 to 4 with 1 representing "not at all" to 4 representing "all the time" |
At 3 months and 12 or 18 months.
|
Efficacy of intervention to change curriculum taught dialysis knowledge in intervention mentees as compared to usual care mentees
Time Frame: 3 months (immediately post intervention) and 12 or 18 months
|
The scores on the Chronic Hemodialysis Knowledge Survey-Plus (CHeKS Plus) (developed by investigators) assessment in mentees assigned to intervention as compared mentees assigned to control. CHeKS Plus: percent correct out of a total of 8 questions |
3 months (immediately post intervention) and 12 or 18 months
|
Efficacy of intervention to change coping ability in intervention mentees as compared to usual care mentees
Time Frame: At 3 months and 12 or 18 months.
|
The score on Brief KCOPE in mentees assigned to intervention as compared to control mentees.
For the brief KCOPE (developed by C.S. Carver (1997)): Scale 1-4 with 1 indication not at all and 4 indicating " doing it a lot".
|
At 3 months and 12 or 18 months.
|
Efficacy of intervention to change depression scores in intervention mentees as compared to usual care mentees
Time Frame: At 3 months and 12 or 18 months.
|
The scores on CESD-10 (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Revised)in mentees assigned to intervention as compared to control mentees.
For the CESD-R10 questions have a scale of 1-4 with 1 indicating rarely or none of the time and 4 indicating all of the time.
(https://cesd-r.com/)
|
At 3 months and 12 or 18 months.
|
Efficacy of intervention to change perception of social support by intervention mentees as compared to usual care mentees
Time Frame: At 3 months and 12 or 18 months.
|
Scores on the "Multi-dimensional Scare of Perceived Social Support(MSPSS)" and "Dialysis Specific Social Support Survey"(developed by PI's) in mentees assigned to intervention as compared to mentees assigned to control. MSPSS: scores on a scale of 1-7 with 1 representing "very strongly disagree" and 7 representing "very strongly agree". Dialysis specific social support survey: scores on a scale from 1-5 with 1 indicating "none of the time" and 5 indication " all of the time". |
At 3 months and 12 or 18 months.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
To test the attendance of mentor subjects at planned training programs
Time Frame: once at 4 weeks from beginning of training
|
To test the feasibility of a training program conducted in a central location by the investigators over 4, 2 hours sessions, attendance records will be checked and reported a ratio of those who showed up on time over the total number expected. The investigators will review attendance records, number of make-up training sessions needed and they will do a qualitative review of formative and summative assessments completed by trainee mentors. The authors will also gather data on trainee participants utilization of snacks, any late arrivals, and impression by trainers of participation. |
once at 4 weeks from beginning of training
|
Acceptability of training program
Time Frame: once at 4 weeks from beginning of training
|
To test the acceptability of the curriculum training the investigators will record the number of make-up training sessions required in order to complete all training for all mentors.
|
once at 4 weeks from beginning of training
|
Efficacy of training program to change the amount of knowledge exhibited by mentors.
Time Frame: once at 4 weeks from beginning of training
|
To test the efficacy of the training the investigators will do a pre- and post- comparison of scores on the CHeKS mentors at time 0 (during initial assessment) and post-mentor training (at the end of the last training module).
|
once at 4 weeks from beginning of training
|
Feasibility of the intervention
Time Frame: every 3 months (at the end of the mentee intervention interval)
|
The investigators will track the sum of duration of telephone contact made between mentors and their assigned mentees during the 3-month intervention period.
|
every 3 months (at the end of the mentee intervention interval)
|
Efficacy of training program to support mentoring skills by the trained mentors
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The investigators will track the self-assessment of performance by mentors after each intervention period using the "Self-Assessment by Mentors at Quarterly Intervals" tool developed by the study staff. The "Self-Assessment by Mentors at Quarterly Intervals" survey is a "free text" questionnaire which will under qualitative review by the investigators. |
3 months
|
Efficacy of training program to change the amount of curriculum-focused knowledge exhibited by mentors
Time Frame: 3 months
|
To test the efficacy of the training the investigators will do a pre- and post- score comparison of on the curriculum focused: "CHeKS PLus" at time 0 (during initial assessment) and post-training (at the end of the last training module)
|
3 months
|
Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The investigators will also do a qualitative analysis of monthly recorded conversations (recorded by mentors) on a monthly basis for each mentee/mentor conversation.
|
3 months
|
Efficacy of training program to help mentors assist intervention mentees with coping skills
Time Frame: 3 months
|
Investigators will the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ)(https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/questionnaires) to measure the performance of mentors from the perspective of their assigned mentees. The HCCQ long form scale is from 1-7 with 1 indicating "strongly disagree" and 7 indicating "strongly agree". |
3 months
|
Efficacy of training program to help mentors perform well in their tasks
Time Frame: 3 months
|
"Checklist for mentee assessment of mentors"(developed by study staff after adaptation from "Peer Up" program) to measure the performance of mentors from the perspective of their assigned mentees. "Checklist for mentee assessment of mentors" scale of 1-7 with 1 indicating "strongly disagree" and 7 indicating "strongly agree" |
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2017-8531
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dialysis
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)CompletedPeritoneal Dialysis | Dialysis | Hospitalizations
-
Eko Devices, Inc.University of North Carolina, Chapel HillRecruitingDialysis; Complications | Dialysis Access MalfunctionUnited States
-
Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreNot yet recruitingPeritoneal Dialysis Complication | Peritoneal Dialysis Access FailureCanada
-
University of LuebeckUnknownComplication of Renal Dialysis | Long-Term Disorder of DialysisGermany
-
University of PennsylvaniaGenentech, Inc.TerminatedDialysis Catheter Fibrin Sheath | Clotted Dialysis Catheter | Catheter MalfunctionUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Parislaboratoire ILM - Université Lyon 1 CNRS, UMR 5306 UCBL; MEXBrain 13 avenue...Not yet recruiting
-
Mayo ClinicAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)Completed
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Fondazione C.N.R./Regione Toscana "G. Monasterio...CompletedPatients on Dialysis (Hemodialysis, Peritoneal Dialysis)Italy
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamArgon Medical DevicesWithdrawnDialysis; Complications | Dialysis Access Malfunction
Clinical Trials on Peer mentorship
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteCompletedAnorexia Nervosa | Binge-Eating Disorder | Bulimia Nervosa | Eating DisorderUnited States
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedChronic Kidney Disease | End-Stage Renal DiseaseUnited States
-
University of ManitobaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; Children's Hospital Research Institute...Not yet recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Type2diabetesCanada
-
University of MichiganNational Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedSuicidal IdeationUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedSuicidal IdeationUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedStress | Burnout | Stress, Psychological | Stress, Emotional | Maternal Health | Mental Health | Quality of Care | Discrimination, Social | Adverse Outcomes | Healthcare ProviderKenya
-
University Health Network, TorontoStony Brook University; York UniversityCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Acute Coronary Syndrome | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention | Chronic Stable Heart Failure | Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery, With or Without Valve SurgeryCanada
-
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of PennsylvaniaCompletedQuality of Life | Surgical Wound | Skin Cancer Face | Peer MentorshipUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationBurnout | Burnout, Psychological | Stress, Psychological | Stress, Emotional | Maternal Health | Mental Health Issue | Discrimination, Social | Adverse Outcomes | Healthcare ProviderGhana, Kenya
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; Royal University Hospital Foundation; Connecticut Children's Medical CenterActive, not recruiting