- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04036344
Buddy Relationships in DermatoloGic Excisions for Skin Cancer (BRIDGES)
Buddy Relationships in DermatoloGic Excisions for Skin Cancer ("BRIDGES"): A Trial of One-to-one Peer Support in Patients With Facial Skin Cancers Treated With Mohs Surgery
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Skin cancer is a common, often chronic condition that negatively impacts patient quality of life. Currently, more than 5 million skin cancer surgeries are performed in the United States each year, at a cost of over $8 billion per year. Eighty percent of these tumors occur on the head and neck, anatomic sites most visible to society. Recent studies have demonstrated that patients have reduced concern about the severity and prognosis of their skin cancer in the period immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). However, patient QOL related to appearance and social interactions is impaired in the weeks following MMS due to elevated distress regarding post-surgical physical appearance.
One-to-one peer support programs benefit both the patient and the mentor. In one-to-one peer support programs, individuals previously affected by a disease or condition volunteer to provide support to current patients in a loosely structured, mentorship setting. Peer mentors provide mentees with social and emotional support as well as practical guidance on health system navigation. Similar peer mentorship programs with burn patients who had significant changes to outward physical appearance resulted in positive experiences for both mentee and mentor. Notable mentee feedback included the formation of an immediate connection with a peer supporter and feelings of "automatic trust" even after previously seeing a mental health professional for their care. Mentors described their participation in peer programs as a source for continued learning and inspiration for their own recovery.
One-to-one peer support is a cost-effective, well-received intervention that increases patient satisfaction and objective QOL measures across many fields. Outcome measurements of one-to-one peer mentorship programs have demonstrated high rates of patient satisfaction and positive psychological outcomes in patients suffering from diabetes, breast cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, and gynecologic cancers. The operating cost of peer support mentorship is low, and these programs can further relieve the health care system by reallocating access to patient support services to a community level.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Eligible candidates will be English-speaking adults with non-metastatic facial skin cancers.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Candidates with severe symptoms of mood, anxiety, or substance use at time of recruitment screening. Participants who require interdisciplinary collaboration (e.g. MMS + plastic surgery, ENT, etc.) for treatment of their facial skin cancer.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
NO_INTERVENTION: Control
Control participants receive treatment for a facial skin cancer with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS), however, do not receive a peer mentor.
Participants complete 3 online Skin Cancer Index (SCI) surveys at enrollment, 1 week follow-up, and 3 month follow-up.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Mentee - Preoperative Consult
Mentees are enrolled at preoperative consultation visit and paired with a peer mentor throughout their treatment of a facial cancer with MMS.
Participants have regular contact with their mentor and complete 3 online SCI surveys at enrollment, 1 week follow-up, and 3 month follow-up.
|
Mentee participants are paired with a previous MMS patient (Mentor) who is greater than 1 year status post MMS treatment for a facial skin cancer.
Mentors and mentees maintain regular contact by telephone, video chat, or in-person meetings throughout the mentee's facial skin cancer treatment with MMS.
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Mentee - Same Day Surgery
Mentees are enrolled at same day surgery visit and paired with a peer mentor throughout their treatment of a facial cancer with MMS.
Participants have regular contact with their mentor and complete 3 online SCI surveys at enrollment, 1 week follow-up, and 3 month follow-up.
|
Mentee participants are paired with a previous MMS patient (Mentor) who is greater than 1 year status post MMS treatment for a facial skin cancer.
Mentors and mentees maintain regular contact by telephone, video chat, or in-person meetings throughout the mentee's facial skin cancer treatment with MMS.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Skin Cancer Index (SCI) scores
Time Frame: Enrollment
|
Primary study measures include patient responses from the Skin Cancer Index (SCI), a disease-specific, 15-question validated QOL instrument.
The SCI is divided into 3 subscales: appearance, emotion, and social domains.
Higher scores indicate increased QOL.
|
Enrollment
|
Skin Cancer Index (SCI) scores
Time Frame: 1-week postoperative follow-up
|
Primary study measures include patient responses from the Skin Cancer Index (SCI), a disease-specific, 15-question validated QOL instrument.
The SCI is divided into 3 subscales: appearance, emotion, and social domains.
Higher scores indicate increased QOL.
|
1-week postoperative follow-up
|
Skin Cancer Index (SCI) scores
Time Frame: 3-month postoperative follow-up
|
Primary study measures include patient responses from the Skin Cancer Index (SCI), a disease-specific, 15-question validated QOL instrument.
The SCI is divided into 3 subscales: appearance, emotion, and social domains.
Higher scores indicate increased QOL.
|
3-month postoperative follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Qualitative participant feedback
Time Frame: 3-month postoperative follow-up
|
Secondary measures will include a post study exit survey to evaluate participant satisfaction and program feedback via qualitative and quantitative variables.
|
3-month postoperative follow-up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sobanko JF, Zhang J, Margolis DJ, Etzkorn JR, Shin TM, Sarwer DB, Miller CJ. Patient-reported quality of life and psychosocial health prior to skin cancer treatment - A cross-sectional study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jul;75(1):217-218.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.01.033. No abstract available.
- Guy GP Jr, Machlin SR, Ekwueme DU, Yabroff KR. Prevalence and costs of skin cancer treatment in the U.S., 2002-2006 and 2007-2011. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Feb;48(2):183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.036. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
- Zhang J, Miller CJ, O'Malley V, Etzkorn JR, Shin TM, Sobanko JF. Patient quality of life fluctuates before and after Mohs micrographic surgery: A longitudinal assessment of the patient experience. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jun;78(6):1060-1067. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.02.065. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
- Sobanko JF, Sarwer DB, Zvargulis Z, Miller CJ. Importance of physical appearance in patients with skin cancer. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Feb;41(2):183-8. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000253.
- Pearl RL, Shao K, Shin TM, Miller CJ, Sobanko JF. Acute Appearance Concerns in Patients Undergoing Mohs Surgery: A Single-Institution Cross-Sectional Study. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Oct;44(10):1349-1351. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000001431. No abstract available.
- Meyer A, Coroiu A, Korner A. One-to-one peer support in cancer care: a review of scholarship published between 2007 and 2014. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 May;24(3):299-312. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12273. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
- Badger K, Royse D. Adult burn survivors' views of peer support: a qualitative study. Soc Work Health Care. 2010;49(4):299-313. doi: 10.1080/00981380903493095.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 831704
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaActive, not recruitingImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
PharmanexSprim Advanced Life SciencesCompletedHealth-related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
Clinical Trials on Peer Mentorship Program
-
Albert Einstein College of MedicineVanderbilt University Medical CenterCompleted
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteCompletedAnorexia Nervosa | Binge-Eating Disorder | Bulimia Nervosa | Eating DisorderUnited States
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedChronic Kidney Disease | End-Stage Renal DiseaseUnited States
-
University of ManitobaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada; Children's Hospital Research Institute...Not yet recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Type2diabetesCanada
-
University of MichiganNational Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedSuicidal IdeationUnited States
-
University of MichiganNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedSuicidal IdeationUnited States
-
Rush University Medical CenterCompleted
-
University of MinnesotaNational Institutes of Health (NIH)CompletedAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedStress | Burnout | Stress, Psychological | Stress, Emotional | Maternal Health | Mental Health | Quality of Care | Discrimination, Social | Adverse Outcomes | Healthcare ProviderKenya
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenEnduring Hearts; University of Alberta/Stollery Children's HospitalCompleted