- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03606265
Utility of a Web-based App for Chronic Pain
July 26, 2021 updated by: Universitat Jaume I
The Effectiveness of a Web-based App for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
This study will compare the effectiveness of a web-based app compared to the treatment as usual without an app for the telemonitoring of patients with chronic pain. Two conditions will be set:
- usual treatment (waiting list)
- usual treatment + app
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Chronic pain is defined as one that lasts for at least three to six months, provided that this time is greater than the normal healing period of an injury.
This pathology has become an important public health problem due to its high prevalence.
In particular, it is estimated that it affects 20-30% of the adult population around the world.
Medical interventions are the first-line treatment in recent clinical practice guidelines.
Unfortunately, the effectiveness of medical interventions is only modest.
Treatments significantly reduce pain on average, but the effect tends to be small .
In addition, the drugs are not effective for a large percentage of patients.
What these and other research suggest is that focusing only on large sample studies and the use of average change scores calls into question the usefulness of current patient-centered treatments.
As noted by Dr. Turk, when data are averaged, various pain syndromes, drugs, surgical procedures, and studies in different countries are often included, which may mask the efficacy results of different treatments with Different samples.
Single case methodology could be one of the ways to overcome these limitations.
The single case investigation is a type of experimental study that offers experimental control within a single case.
Some studies have already demonstrated the usefulness of these designs in chronic pain.
In fact, the benefits of using this methodology as opposed to large sample studies were discussed recently during the 10th Congress of the European Pain Federation.
These benefits include the need for a reduced number of participants, the ability to follow clinical evolution in real time and continuously, the amount of data provided, and applicability when using a control group is impractical or unethical.
The investigators conducting the present investigation recently conducted a study at the Pain Unit of the Hospital General de Castellón to explore the effectiveness of current medical treatments.
According to previous investigations, the treatment effect was only small (d = 0.32) and only a percentage of the patients (18.1%) had a clinically significant reduction of pain (ie a reduction greater than 30% ).
From these results and the literature reviewed, a single case design could be an alternative method for research in the Pain Unit.
However, the implementation of this type of methodology can be very costly due to the continuous evaluation of the evolution of the patient.
In this sense, several studies have already shown that mobile applications (app) can effectively control the evolution of a wide range of pathologies in health settings .
In fact, a recent controlled clinical study found that ecological records performed with mobile app had greater reliability than paper-and-pencil records.
Rosser and Eccleston conducted a comprehensive review of existing apps for pain and the conclusion was that there was little evidence to support the use of current apps.
Specifically, these authors showed that most apps did not specify whether their content was validated, did not include psychological components and none had been applied in a clinical study.
In light of these results, Dr. Carlos Suso Ribera and Dr. Ribera Canudas contacted the research team Labpsitec of Jaume I University, who were developing an application for pain called "Pain Monitor".
Dr. Carlos Suso Ribera and Dr. Ribera Canudas of the Pain Unit collaborated with Dr. Azucena García Palacios and Dr. Diana Castilla López of the Universitat Jaume I in the final development of the application of pain, Following the guidelines of Rosser and Eccleston.
App content validity and usability was tested in a previous study at the pain unit of the Vall d'Hebron Hospital (Suso-Ribera et al., in preparation).
Thus, the study objective is to test if the introduction of this tool in the day-to-day work of the pain unit improves pain management of chronic pain patients.
To do this, it is necessary to compare the evolution of patients who follow the usual treatment at the pain unit (without app) with a group of patients who do use the Pain Monitor app.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
90
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Castellón De La Plana, Spain
- Hospital General Universitario de Castelló
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient is over 18 years of age
- The patient has a mobile phone with Android operating system
- The patient has the physical ability to use the application
- The patient does not present psychological and / or cognitive alterations or problems with language that make their participation difficult
- The patient voluntarily wants to participate and signs the informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- The patient is under 18 years
- The patient does not have a mobile phone or has a mobile phone in which Android is not the operating system (the app is currently only available for Android for economic reasons)
- The patient does not have the physical capacity to use the application
- The patient does not have the capacity to participate due to psychological and / or cognitive alterations or problems with language
- The patient does not want to participate
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: App+Web
Treatment as usual + app Participants at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment for their pain but also they will be monitored daily using the Pain Monitor app.
Alarms will be generated in the face of certain preestablished events.
Physicians will be asked to call patients and change/stop treatment if an alarm is received.
|
Patients will use an app daily twice and physicians will use a website to consult the characteristics of the alarms the app will send them in the presence of an unwanted event
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Treatment as usual
Treatment as usual (waiting list) Patients at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment at the pain unit, but they will not be monitored daily using the app.
|
Patients will be offered the usual treatment for their pain, which is not changed by study participation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in pain intensity by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Level of pain intensity experienced by the patient.
Measure: Brief pain intensity questionnaire.
0-10 range (0=no pain, 10=maximum pain)
|
First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Change in side effects
Time Frame: First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
A list of the most frequent side effects of pain medication has been created.
Dicotomous variable.
For each side effect: 0=side effect not present; 1=side effect present
|
First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in pain interference by an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale
Time Frame: First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Interference of pain with patient's life.
Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire.
0-10 range (0=no interference, 10=maximum interference)
|
First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Change in depression
Time Frame: First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Item scoring is 0 to 3. Response anchors vary across items.
Subscale range is 0-21.
Higher scores indicate more depression
|
First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Change in anxiety
Time Frame: First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
Item scoring is 0 to 3. Response anchors vary across items.
Subscale range is 0-21.
Higher scores indicate more anxiety
|
First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Change in pain catastrophizing
Time Frame: First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Pain Catastrophizing Scale.
Item scoring is 0=not at all to 4=all the time.
Scale range is 0 to 52.
Higher scores indicate more catastrophizing
|
First study day and end of study (Day 1 and day 30)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
August 15, 2018
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
December 29, 2020
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
March 29, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 27, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
July 30, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
July 27, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 26, 2021
Last Verified
July 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GeneralAPP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain
-
Pain ConcernThe Thistle Foundation; Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland (the ALLIANCE) and other collaboratorsCompletedChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Chronic Pain, Widespread | Chronic Pain Due to Trauma | Chronic Pain Due to Malignancy (Finding) | Chronic Pain Due to Injury | Chronic Pain Post-Procedural | Chronic Pain HipUnited Kingdom
-
Consorci Sanitari de l'Alt Penedès i GarrafRecruitingChronic Post Operative Pain | Chronic Post-surgical Pain | Chronic Knee PainSpain
-
Dow University of Health SciencesRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Low Back Pain, Mechanical | Mechanical Low Back Pain | Pain, Chronic | Pain, Back | Lower Back Pain Chronic | CLBP - Chronic Low Back PainPakistan
-
University of Alabama, TuscaloosaPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; East Carolina University; Whatley...CompletedPain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic Pain | Chronic Pain Due to InjuryUnited States
-
University of UtahRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Pain Syndrome | Widespread Chronic PainUnited States
-
Evolve Restorative CenterFlowonix Medical; Celéri Health, Inc.; Advanced Infusion SolutionsCompletedPain, Chronic | Pain, Intractable | Chronic Nonmalignant PainUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Thoracotomy | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, ChronicTurkey
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionActive, not recruitingPain, Chronic | Widespread Chronic PainSweden
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedLow Back Pain, Mechanical, Biofeedback, Pain, Chronic
Clinical Trials on App+Web
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNot yet recruiting
-
Oregon Center for Applied Science, Inc.National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedBlood Pressure | WeightUnited States
-
SEPAR- EPOCRecruiting
-
California State University, NorthridgeCompletedAlcohol Drinking | Binge Drinking | Marijuana Use | Substance Use | Illicit Drug Use | Prescription Opioid MisuseUnited States
-
Universidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillCompletedPosttraumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
CEU San Pablo UniversityCompleted
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNot yet recruitingGender DysphoriaUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNot yet recruitingGender DysphoriaUnited States
-
Digital Health Navigation Solutions, IncNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Wake Forest University Health SciencesNot yet recruitingColorectal Cancer ScreeningUnited States