Evaluation of the Effects of Different Analgesics on Pericoronitis Pain and Quality of Life

November 16, 2018 updated by: abdullah alalwani, Near East University, Turkey

Evaluation of the Effects of Different Analgesics on Pain and Health-related Quality of Life of Patients With Pericoronitis in the Short-term Period: A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial

Pericoronitis is a painful inflammatory condition which is well known for its negative impact on quality of life of those affected. The aim of this study was to test two hypotheses: (1) that topical application of Benzydamine is as effective as oral Diclofenac or Flurbiprofen in improving pain and quality of life of patients with pericoronitis and (2) that there would be no difference between the effects of the two oral NSAIDs on pain and quality of life of patients with pericoronitis

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mersin, Turkey, 99010
        • Abdullah AlAlwani

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Young adults aged 18 years or over
  • Diagnosed with mild pericoronitis
  • Having semi-impacted mandibular third molar
  • Symptoms of pain and localized swelling

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoking
  • History of allergy to diclofenac, flurbiprofen, benzydamine or other NSAIDs
  • Use of systemic antibiotics or analgesics within 3 days before admission
  • The patients who had symptoms of severe pericoronitis such as fever higher than 101°F, dysphagia, trismus or facial swelling.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diclofenac
Diclofenac group, which received diclofenac 50 mg capsules (Cataflam) and placebo sprays. Placebo sprays have consisted of a normal saline solution and peppermint flavor.
All patients were instructed to take one capsule orally every 8 h and apply the spray (4 puffs to the pericoronitis area) every 4 h for 7 days, commencing immediately after the clinical examination.
Experimental: Flurbiprofen
Flurbiprofen group, which received flurbiprofen 100 mg capsules and placebo sprays. Placebo sprays have consisted of a normal saline solution and peppermint flavor.
All patients were instructed to take one capsule orally every 8 h and apply the spray (4 puffs to the pericoronitis area) every 4 h for 7 days, commencing immediately after the clinical examination.
Experimental: Benzydamine
Benzydamine group, which received benzydamine 0.045 g, 30 mL oral sprays (Tantum Verde) and placebo capsules. Placebo capsules contained starch.
All patients were instructed to take one capsule orally every 8 h and apply the spray (4 puffs to the pericoronitis area) every 4 h for 7 days, commencing immediately after the clinical examination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Evaluated
Time Frame: Baseline
For the pre- treatment period, the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life scores change was evaluated in the 1st day after the clinical examination and before the treatment with the help of the 5-point Likert-type scale where each item was scored from 1 (no trouble) to 5 (lots of trouble).
Baseline
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Scores Evaluated
Time Frame: one week after drug prescribed
For the post - treatment period, the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life scores change was evaluated with the help of the 5-point Likert-type scale where each item was scored from 1 (no trouble) to 5 (lots of trouble). Evaluated periods were 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 days
one week after drug prescribed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Scores Evaluated
Time Frame: Baseline
For the pre-treatment period, the pain scores change was evaluated in the 1st day after the clinical examination and before the treatment with the help of the visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).
Baseline
Pain Scores Evaluated
Time Frame: one week after drug prescribed
For the post-treatment period, the pain scores change was evaluated in the 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7days with the help of the visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (most severe pain).
one week after drug prescribed

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) Scores Evaluated
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after drug prescribed
Before and after the treatment period, the Oral Health Impact Profile scores change was evaluated in the 1st day after the clinical examination and before the treatment (baseline), and after 7 days with the help of the 5-point scale where each item was scored from "never" = 0, "hardly ever" = 1, "occasionally" = 2, "fairly often" = 3, "very often = 4"
Baseline and one week after drug prescribed

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abdullah AlAlwani, DDS, Near east University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 3, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 2, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Diclofenac

3
Subscribe