Ectoin® Mouth Wash (EML03) in the Prevention and Treatment of Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis

November 5, 2019 updated by: Bitop AG

Prospective Comparator Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Ectoin® Mouth Wash (EML03) in the Prevention and Treatment of Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis

This prospective non-interventional comparator study is to collect data on the clinical effectiveness and compliance of Ectoin® Mouth Wash solution (EML03) and to proof superiority to a well-established medical device on the market in the prevention of radiation-induced mucositis. The study doesn´t intervene with routine treatment strategy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Budapest, Hungary, 1122
        • Department of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals regardless of gender older than 18 years
  • Patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinomas [SCCHN] without metastases of other nonhead and nonneck tumors
  • Patients receiving radiotherapy with a Karnofsky performance index >70%
  • Absence of any sign of oral mucositis at baseline (visit 1)
  • A definitive or postoperative treatment
  • Radiation therapy dosage: Limitation dose rate of 60-70 Gy
  • Radiotherapy of 6-7 weeks duration

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects younger than 18 years
  • Hypersensitivity to Ectoin® or any of the other ingredients of the mouth wash
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding women
  • Any disease that can, in the opinion of the treating physician, affect the outcome of the observational trial
  • Patients who had a history of previous radiotherapy in head-neck region or chemotherapy
  • Massive alcoholic anamnesis
  • Massive smoker >20 cigarettes per day at present

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ectoin Mouth Wash
30 patients obtaining EML03 treatment
According to medical prescription of the instruction for use under consideration (at least 4x1 ampoule (5ml) daily, rinsed in the mouth for at least 30 seconds)
Active Comparator: Supersaturated solution of calcium and phosphate ions
20 patients taking standard treatment (calcium phosphate mouth wash)
According to medical prescription of the instruction for use under consideration (4 times a day).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in degree of mucositis (according to WHO classification of mucositis grade) documented by the physician
Time Frame: Visit 1 (day 0), Visit 2 (after 14 days), Visit 3 (after 28 days), Visit 4 (after 42 days), Visit 5 (28 days after the last RT)
The degree of oral mucositis will be assessed as follow: grade 0, no signs or symptoms; grade 1, oral soreness and erythema; grade 2, oral erythema, ulcers and solid diet tolerated; grade 3, oral ulcers and liquid diet only; grade 4, oral alimentation impossible
Visit 1 (day 0), Visit 2 (after 14 days), Visit 3 (after 28 days), Visit 4 (after 42 days), Visit 5 (28 days after the last RT)
Change in mucositis symptoms dry mucosa, irritation of mucosa, coated tongue, unpleasant breath, decreased saliva release, pain, swelling, ulcer, difficulty to speak and difficulty to eat and dring by using a Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: day 0, day 14, day 26, day 42, Visit 5 (28 days after the last RT)
Mucositis symptoms will be measured by using a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms).
day 0, day 14, day 26, day 42, Visit 5 (28 days after the last RT)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events will be assessed by using the Suspect Adverse Reaction Report Form (CIOMS Form I)
Time Frame: within 28 days after starting radiotherapy
All occuring adverse events/serious adverse events will be documented during the entire study period.
within 28 days after starting radiotherapy
Changes in Karnofsky status over time by using the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)
Time Frame: Visit 1 (day 0), Visit 2 (after 14 days), Visit 3 (after 28 days), Visit 4 (after 42 days), Visit 5 (after 28 days after the last RT)
The KPS index allows patients to be classified as to their functional impairment and describes a patient's functional status as a comprehensive 11-point scale correlating to percentage values ranging from 100% (no symptoms) to 0% (death).
Visit 1 (day 0), Visit 2 (after 14 days), Visit 3 (after 28 days), Visit 4 (after 42 days), Visit 5 (after 28 days after the last RT)
Tolerability assessment by using a subsequent patient questionnaire
Time Frame: day 28
The following score system will be used to quantify these evaluation: "very good" = 4; "good" =3; "neither good nor bad" = 2; "bad" = 1 and "very bad" = 0.
day 28
Satisfaction assessed by a subsequent patient questionnaire
Time Frame: day 28
The following score system will be used to quantify these evaluation: "yes" 2; "maybe" = 1; and "no" = 0.
day 28

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Andreas Bilstein, PhD, bitop AG

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 18, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

November 5, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oral Mucositis Due to Radiation

Clinical Trials on Ectoin Mouth Wash

3
Subscribe