Using Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy to Improve the Well-Being of Adolescent Girls

November 4, 2022 updated by: Sarah Baird, George Washington University

Adolescent girls in developing countries face high rates of adversity and are at an elevated risk of depression and other forms of psychological distress. Untreated depression can have negative consequences on life outcomes such as early pregnancies, social exclusion and school dropout. These can result in a cycle of poverty for young women and their families. Despite this being a very pressing problem there is little evidence on what types of interventions can help break the vicious cycle of poor mental health and poverty.

This research program aims to evaluate, through the use of a cluster-Randomized Control Trial (cluster- RCT), the effect of group-based interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT-G) and unconditional cash transfers on adolescent girls' mental health and social functioning. Working with Strong Minds Uganda in collaboration with BRAC Uganda's Empowerment and Livelihood for Adolescents (ELA) clubs, the evidence generated from this research will create a better understanding of whether adolescent mental health improves through this cost-effective approach, and whether improved mental health impacts other outcomes of interest.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1914

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kampala, Uganda
        • BRAC Uganda

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 19 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 13-19 year old female who scores 10 or above on PHQ-8

Exclusion Criteria:

  • male
  • Score below 10 on PHQ-8

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: group-based interpersonal therapy (IPT-G)
14 weeks of group-based interpersonal therapy (IPT-G): StrongMinds is focused on treating depression in Uganda by training community members (in this case ELA club mentors) to act as mentors in IPT-G techniques. This intervention will be offered to 13-19 year old young women who score a 10 or higher on the PHQ-8. These adolescents who take up the offer will then be enrolled in the 14 weeks of therapy. Group therapy sessions build bonds between young women and encourage them to actively engage in the healing process and to support each other in the exploration of their depression triggers. With new healthier patterns and skills, women can learn to manage their current depression and ensure future depressive episodes can be quickly identified and resolved before the onset of any long-term consequences.
14 weeks of group-based interpersonal therapy (IPT-G)
EXPERIMENTAL: IPT-G + Unconditional Cash Transfer:
A one time lump sum of 200,000 UGX (~$54) be provided to all study participants in a random sub-set of intervention (IPT-G) clusters near or at the conclusion of the 14-week therapy. This treatment variation will allow for determination of whether complimentary income support enhances the effects of IPT-G on psychological wellbeing and other outcomes of interest.
14 weeks of group-based interpersonal therapy (IPT-G)
Lump sum cash transfer
NO_INTERVENTION: control
ELA clubs function as normal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minimal Depression 1a
Time Frame: 6 months
Score <=10 Primary Health Questionnaire 8 (0-24, higher is worse)
6 months
Minimal Depression 1b
Time Frame: 12 months
Score <=10 Primary Health Questionnaire 8 (0-24, higher is worse)
12 months
Minimal Depression 1c
Time Frame: 24 months
Score <=10 Primary Health Questionnaire 8 (0-24, higher is worse)
24 months
Psychological Distress 2a
Time Frame: 6 months
Score >=3 on the General Health Questionnaire 12 (0-12, higher is worse)
6 months
Psychological Distress 2b
Time Frame: 12 months
Score >=3 on the General Health Questionnaire 12 (0-12, higher is worse)
12 months
Psychological Distress 2c
Time Frame: 24 months
Score >=3 on the General Health Questionnaire 12 (0-12, higher is worse)
24 months
Self Esteem a
Time Frame: 6 months
score on Rosenberg self esteem (0-30, higher is better)
6 months
Self Esteem b
Time Frame: 12 months
score on Rosenberg self esteem (0-30, higher is better)
12 months
Self Esteem c
Time Frame: 24 months
score on Rosenberg self esteem (0-30, higher is better)
24 months
Resilience a
Time Frame: 6 months
score on Child & Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (0-34, higher is better)
6 months
Resilience b
Time Frame: 12 months
score on Child & Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (0-34, higher is better)
12 months
Resilience c
Time Frame: 24 months
score on Child & Youth Resilience Measure-Revised (0-34, higher is better)
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Indicator for Self-Reported School Enrollment a
Time Frame: 12 months
Indicator for enrolled in school (=1 if Adolescent Self-Reports Enrolled in school at time of survey)
12 months
Indicator for Self-Reported School Enrollment b
Time Frame: 24 months
Indicator for enrolled in school (=1 if Adolescent Self-Reports Enrolled in school at time of survey)
24 months
incidence of pregnancy a
Time Frame: 12 months
incidence of pregnancy from baseline
12 months
incidence of pregnancy b
Time Frame: 24 months
incidence of pregnancy from baseline
24 months
Child Marriage a
Time Frame: 12 months
incidence of marriage from baseline
12 months
Child Marriage b
Time Frame: 24 months
incidence of marriage from baseline
24 months
Competencies a
Time Frame: 12 months
Score on competency test. This is a score that takes on a value of 0-3 across a set of three questions on ability to answer skills based math questions. Higher is better
12 months
Competencies b
Time Frame: 24 months
Score on competency test. This is a score that takes on a value of 0-3 across a set of three questions on ability to answer skills based math questions. Higher is better
24 months
Indicator for self -reported condom use at last sex a
Time Frame: 12 months
condom use during last sexual encounter (=1 if Adolescent self reports using a condom at last sex)
12 months
indicator for self-reported condom use at last sex b
Time Frame: 24 months
condom use during last sexual encounter (=1 if Adolescent self reports using a condom at last sex)
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 26, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 29, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SMU/BRAC 2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available at the conclusion of the study.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be made available at the conclusion of the study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Depression

Clinical Trials on IPT-G

3
Subscribe