- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03968601
Use of Pre-operative Global Longitudinal Strain to Predict Post-operative Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Mitral Regurgitation Surgery (DysPO IM)
Prediction of Post-operative Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Primitive, Chronic Mitral Regurgitation Surgery With Preserved Ejection Fraction, by Pre-operative Global Longitudinal Strain Measure
Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most frequent valve disease requiring surgery and it is important to identify patients whose outcome could be improved with surgery by considering the risks and benefits.
The current guidelines recommend surgery in patients with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation or in asymptomatic patients who develop early signs of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction as a result of the MR.
However, it remains difficult to determine optimal timing for surgery with the current guidelines.
Early-stage LV dysfunction with normal LVEF predicts post-operative LV decompensation and poor prognosis and longitudinal myocardial function is suitable for detection of minor myocardial damage in patients with MR.
Thus, inestigators want to study the value of LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) to predict postoperative LV dysfunction in patients with chronic severe MR and preserved pre-operative LVEF.
The principal aim is to prove that the optimal timing for surgery, in asymptomatic chronic severe primary MR with preserved LVEF, is before GLS alteration, and that investigators should not wait for LV dilatation of dysfunction.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Primary mitral regurgitation (MR) is the second most frequent valve disease requiring surgery.
In these patients, mitral repair is associated with excellent outcomes in terms of post-operative left ventricular (LV) function, and long-term survival when performed before the onset of severe symptoms, LV dysfunction or dilatation, pulmonary hypertension, and atrial fibrillation.
Thus, it is important to identify patients whose outcome could be improved with surgery by considering the risks and benefits.
The current guidelines recommend surgery in patients with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation or in asymptomatic patients who develop early signs of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction as a result of the MR. LV dysfunction has been defined as LV ejection fraction (EF) 30% to 60% and/or LV end-systolic dimension (ESD) up to 45 mm.
However, it remains difficult to determine optimal timing for surgery with the current guidelines.
LVEF and LVESD, parameters proposed in the guideline, are difficult to interpret due to the influence of hemodynamic parameters of MR.
In asymptomatic patients who consider undergoing surgery, LVESD is rarely more than 45 mm.
In addition, LVEF in patients with severe MR often remains normal or higher, and subclinical LV dysfunction might be masked due to MR lowering of LV afterload.
Early-stage LV dysfunction with normal LVEF predicts post-operative LV decompensation and poor prognosis.
Therefore, it is a great challenge to identify potential LV dysfunction at an early stage and to perform surgery to prevent the development of irreversible LV dysfunction in patients with chronic severe MR.
Longitudinal myocardial function has been considered more sensitive than radial function and is therefore suitable for detection of minor myocardial damage in patients with MR.
A 2017 study proved that pre-operative GLS ≤ -18.4% can predict a preserved post-operative LVEF >50%.
Therefore, invetsigators want to study the value of LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) to predict postoperative LV dysfunction in patients with chronic severe MR and preserved pre-operative LVEF.
The principal aim is to prove that the optimal timing for surgery, in asymptomatic chronic severe primary MR with preserved LVEF, is before GLS alteration, and that investigators should not wait for LV dilatation of dysfunction.
Thus, investigators will recruit patients before surgery, measuring GLS during pre-operative conventional echography, and follow-up patients at 8 days, 1 month and 6 months to determine whether LVEF is preserved or not.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
- CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Patients with another form of cardiopathy, such as dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, ischemic or rhythmic cardiopathy.
- Patients with another valvular heart disease, such as significant aortic regurgitation or stenosis and significant mitral stenosis.
- Poor echogenicity, insufficient for the different measures.
- Severe pulmonary disease, inducing pulmonary hypertension.
- Other causes of pulmonary hypertension.
- Patients included in other studies with interventions able to interfere with our measures.
- Pregnant women.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Stage 3 or 4, primary and chronic mitral regurgitation, going for a planned surgery, with pre-operative left ventricular ejection fraction > 60% and left ventricular end-systolic dimension < 45mm.
- Able to consent.
- With a National Social Security number.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
cohorte 1
Severe primary chronic mitral regurgitation with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
|
Mitral regurgitation surgery such as mitral valve replacement or repair.
All kind of mitral regurgitation surgery: replacement or repair, by median sternotomy of minimally invasive surgery, with or without tricuspid plasty
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pre-operative global longitudinal strain rate among patients going for mitral surgery.
Time Frame: During pre-operative visit
|
Pre-operative global longitudinal strain in patients going for mitral regurgitation surgery with preserved LVEF, measured by echocardiography.
|
During pre-operative visit
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Functional impact in terms of walking distance.
Time Frame: This test will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
6 Minute Walk Distance
|
This test will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
Measure Quality of life: Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ)
Time Frame: This test will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), evaluating : legs swelling, walking and working capacity, presence of sleeping or breathing disorders, difficulties for sport, hobbies or relationships, side effects from medications, psychologic and economic impact of the disease.
The total score goes from 0 (best quality of life) to 105 (worse impact).
|
This test will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
Dyspnoea
Time Frame: This test will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 8-days, 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
Use of the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification.
|
This test will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 8-days, 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
Left ventricular function
Time Frame: This test will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 8-days, 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
Left ventricular ejection fraction by Simpson method.
|
This test will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 8-days, 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
All-cause mortality, as the total number of death during the follow-up
Time Frame: At 8 days, 1-month and 6-months
|
all death reported
|
At 8 days, 1-month and 6-months
|
Cardiovascular mortality, as the number of death from cardiovascular disease during the follow up
Time Frame: At 8 days, 1-month and 6-months
|
Death by myocardial ischemia or infarction, heart failure, cardiac arrest, or cerebrovascular accident.
|
At 8 days, 1-month and 6-months
|
Number of patients hospitalized due to heart failure during the follow up
Time Frame: At 8 days, 1-month and 6-months
|
all re-hospitalisation reported
|
At 8 days, 1-month and 6-months
|
Pre-operative right ventricular function (measured by Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion - TAPSE, Peak Systolic Velocity in DTI mode and Fractional Area Change).
Time Frame: These measures will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 1-month and 6-months visits
|
We aim to determine whether or not right ventricular function (measured by Tricuspid Annular Plane Systolic Excursion - TAPSE, Peak Systolic Velocity in DTI mode and Fractional Area Change) can have an impact on post-operative LVEF in patients going for mitral regurgitation surgery.
|
These measures will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 1-month and 6-months visits
|
Pre-operative pulmonary arterial pressure determined by tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity
Time Frame: These measures will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
Ithe aim is to determine whether or not pulmonary hypertension (determined by tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity) can have an impact on post-operative LVEF in patients going for mitral regurgitation surgery.
|
These measures will be realized during pre-operative visit and repeated at 1-month and 6-months visits.
|
Left ventricular ejection index
Time Frame: During pre-operative visit.
|
Impact of this novel left ventricular ejection index (defined as indexed left ventricular end-systolic diameter divided by left ventricular outflow tract time-velocity integral) on post-operative left ventricular dysfunction, compared with global longitudinal strain.
|
During pre-operative visit.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- RNI 2018 CLERFOND
- 2018-A02476-49 (OTHER: 2018-A02476-49)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Severe Mitral Regurgitation
-
University of ZurichEdwards LifesciencesUnknownSevere Degenerative Mitral RegurgitationSwitzerland
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity Hospital, Basel, Switzerland; Cardiocentro Ticino; Triemli HospitalRecruiting
-
Ancora Heart, Inc.CompletedSevere Functional Mitral Regurgitation and Heart FailureAustralia
-
Centre Cardiologique du NordCampus Bio-Medico University; University of Genova; Henri Mondor University Hospital and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationSevere Mitral Valve Regurgitation (Disorder)France
-
Mayo ClinicRecruitingNonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation | Severe Degenerative Mitral RegurgitationUnited States, Canada
-
University of ManitobaRecruitingSevere Aortic Valve Stenosis | Severe Mitral Valve RegurgitationCanada
-
Edwards LifesciencesICON plcTerminatedSevere Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation Due to Mid-segment Posterior Leaflet ProlapseGermany, Spain, Switzerland
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedFunctional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerrative Mitral RegurgitationRussian Federation
-
Ancora Heart, Inc.CompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Functional Mitral RegurgitationAustria, Lithuania, Germany
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve RegurgitationGermany
Clinical Trials on Mitral regurgitation surgery such as mitral valve replacement or repair
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral InsufficiencyUnited States
-
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of CirculationCompletedHypertrophic Obstructive CardiomyopathyRussian Federation
-
Michele De BonisCompletedDegenerative Mitral Valve DiseaseItaly
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Recruiting
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Canadian Institutes of Health... and other collaboratorsCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Mitral Valve InsufficiencyUnited States, Canada
-
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernRecruitingAortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Moderate Aortic Stenosis Combined With Mitral RegurgitationSwitzerland
-
Semmelweis University Heart and Vascular CenterCompletedRight Ventricular Dysfunction | Right Heart Failure | Right Ventricular Failure | Mitral Valve DiseaseHungary
-
Annetine GelijnsNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Canadian Institutes of Health... and other collaboratorsCompletedAtrial Fibrillation | Mitral Valve Insufficiency | Mitral Valve StenosisUnited States, Canada
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Canadian Institutes of Health...Active, not recruitingCoronary Artery Disease | Mitral Valve InsufficiencyUnited States, Canada
-
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of CirculationUnknownPulmonary HypertensionRussian Federation