Compare Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Proposed Rituximab Biosimilar (DRL_RI) With MabThera® in LTB Follicular Lymphoma (FLINTER)

January 16, 2024 updated by: Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Limited

A Double-blind, Parallel-group, Phase III Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Proposed Rituximab Biosimilar (DRL_RI) With MabThera® in Subjects With Previously Untreated (CD)20-Positive LTB Follicular Lymphoma

The primary objective of the current study is to demonstrate the equivalent efficacy of rituximab (DRL_RI) and MabThera® in subjects with Low Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma (LTB-FL).

Also evaluated by Pharmacokinetic, safety, and immunogenicity assessment between a proposed biosimilar (DRL_RI) and the RMP, as an component of clinical study program, and collectively providing the evidence of biosimilarity.

The study will compare the safety and efficacy of DRL_RI vs MabThera in patients with Low Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma (LTB-FL). The primary objective is to establish comparative efficacy as measured by ORR up to week 28

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is planned to randomise approx. 312 subjects at approximately ≥ 130 study sites worldwide. Subjects with LTB-FL will be randomized to receive either DRL_RI or MabThera®. Till date, 68 patients have been randomized for the study.

The study specific objectives are mentioned below:

Primary Objective:

• To demonstrate the equivalent efficacy of DRL_RI (biosimilar rituximab) and MabThera in subjects with CD20-positive, LTB FL, as measured by overall response rate (ORR) up to Week 28 evaluated in accordance with Cheson, 1999 response criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To compare the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DOR) of DRL_RI with MabThera® in subjects with CD20-positive, LTB FL.
  • To compare the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of DRL_RI with MabThera in subjects with CD20-positive, LTB-FL.

Exploratory Objectives

  • To explore the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of DRL_RI and MabThera, using a population-PK modelling approach.
  • To explore the pharmacodynamic parameters of DRL_RI and MabThera.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

317

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Whittier, California, United States, 90602
        • The Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20817
        • American Oncology Partners of Maryland
    • Tennessee
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37920
        • University of Tennessee Medical Center - Cancer Institute
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77089
        • Gulf coast Oncology Associates, PA

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is Male or female subjects aged ≥18 years of age.
  2. Subject is histologically confirmed, Grade 1-3a, previous ly untreated, CD20-pos itive.
  3. Subject has Ann Arbor Stage II to IV and ECOG status of 0 to 1.
  4. Subject has Low tumor burden follicular lymphoma as per Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) Criteria
  5. Subject has at least 1 measurable tumor mass in 2 dimensions, and the mass must be:

    1. Nodal lesion >15 mm in the longest dimension; or
    2. Noda l lesion >10 mm to he longest dimension; dimens ion and >10 mm in the shortest dimension; or
    3. Extra-nodal lesion with both long and short dimensions ≥10 mm.
  6. Subject has Life expectancy ≥3 months.
  7. If female subject, then subject should be non-pregnant, non-lactating.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject with prior use of rituximab or any CD20 monoclonal antibody for any reason.
  2. Subjects with known hypersensitivity to rituximab or its excipients, or to proteins of murine or other foreign origin.
  3. Any prior therapy for follicular lymphoma (including but not limited to chemotherapy, radiotherapy) or subjects on chronic supra-substitutive doses of systemic gluco-corticosteriods.
  4. Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, require additional concomitant treatment for lymphoma.
  5. Evidence of histologic transformation to high grade lymphoma or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
  6. Subjects with known sero-positivity for or history of active viral infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) will be excluded. And if positive for hepatitis B core antibody or hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody can only be enrolled if HBV - DNA level <20 IU/mL (or 112 copies/mL) and HCV - RNA is negative respectively by PCR test..
  7. Subjects who have received a live vaccine within last 3 months of the first administration of study drug.
  8. Subjects with history or presence of a medical condition or disease that in the Investigator's opinion would place the subject at an unacceptable risk for study participation.
  9. Participation in any clinical study or having taken any investigational therapy (within 2-months of the first dose of study drug.
  10. Women of childbearing potential who do not consent to use highly effective methods of birth control.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm A: DRL_RI
DRL_RI (rituximab-Dr. Reddy's Lab) for infusion 375 mg/m2 administered via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 and Weeks 12, 20, 28 and 36
Proposed rituximab biosimilar, 100mg and 500mg, concentrate for solution for infusion
Active Comparator: Arm B: MabThera®
MabThera® for infusion 375 mg/m2 administered via IV infusion on Days 1, 8, 15, 22 and Week 12, 20, 28 and 36.
Reference product rituximab, 100mg and 500mg, concentrate for solution for infusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) for Low Tumor Burden Follicular Lymphoma
Time Frame: Month 7 (Week 28)
Best Overall Response Rate (BORR) is defined as the proportion of participants in each treatment group that achieved a best overall response of either Complete response (CR), unconfirmed Complete response (CRu) or Partial response (PR), up to Month 7 (Week 28) based on central radiology review in accordance with the Cheson, 1999 response criteria for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphomas. As per Cheson 1999, response criteria for target lesions and assessed by radiology: Complete response (CR): All lesions with a longest diameter should be regressed to normal size (≤ 15 mm) or short axis regressed to ≤ 10 mm with confirmed Bone marrow normalization; unconfirmed Complete response (CRu): All lesions with a longest diameter should be regressed to normal size (≤ 15 mm) or short axis regressed to ≤ 10 mm with non-confirmed Bone marrow normalization; Partial Response (PR): ≥ 50 % decrease of sum of products of diameter(SPD) of all the target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+CRu+PR.
Month 7 (Week 28)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Week 12, Week 28
The overall response rate (ORR) is defined as proportion of participants in each treatment group achieved a complete response or partial response at week 12 and week 28 based on central radiology review in accordance with published response criteria for malignant lymphoma. As per Cheson 1999, response criteria for target lesions and assessed by radiology: Complete response (CR): All lesions with a longest diameter should be regressed to normal size (≤ 15 mm) or short axis regressed to ≤ 10 mm with confirmed Bone marrow normalization; unconfirmed Complete response (uCR): All lesions with a longest diameter should be regressed to normal size (≤ 15 mm) or short axis regressed to ≤ 10 mm with non-confirmed Bone marrow normalization; Partial Response (PR): ≥ 50 % decrease of sum of products of diameter(SPD) of all the target lesions; Overall Response (OR)=CR+uCR+PR.
Week 12, Week 28
Complete Response Rate
Time Frame: Week 28
Complete Response rate is defined as the proportion of participants in each treatment group who achieved complete response up to particular visit based on investigator assessment in accordance with the response criteria for malignant lymphoma. As per Cheson 1999, response criteria for target lesions and assessed by radiology: Complete response (CR): All lesions with a longest diameter should be regressed to normal size (≤ 15 mm) or short axis regressed to ≤ 10 mm with confirmed Bone marrow normalization.
Week 28
Complete Response Rate as a Best Response
Time Frame: Week 28
Complete Response Rate as a Best Response is defined as the proportion of participants in each treatment group that achieved the best complete response up to Week 28 based on central radiology review in accordance with the Cheson 1999, response criteria for malignant lymphoma. As per Cheson 1999, response criteria for target lesions and assessed by radiology: Complete response (CR): All lesions with a longest diameter should be regressed to normal size (≤ 15 mm) or short axis regressed to ≤ 10 mm with confirmed Bone marrow normalization.
Week 28
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time Frame: Week 52

Duration of response (DOR) defined as the time from date of the first documentation of tumor response (Complete Response, unconfirmed complete response or partial response) to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or to death due to any cause up to 52 weeks/ End of study (EOS). Progression is defined as per Cheson 1999, response criteria is:

Target Nodal SPD Progression: at least one node must be abnormal, and the SPD of all nodes must increase by ≥ 50% from its nadir SPD.

Target Extranodal SPD Progression: at least one extranodal lesion must be present and the SPD of all extranodal lesions must increase by ≥ 50% from its nadir SPD.

Also, if a patient had any unequivocal progression in non-target lesions; and detection of any new nodal lesion (longest diameter [LDi] 15mm with an absolute increase of 5mm) his/her response was considered as Progressive disease.

Week 52
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Week 52

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of documented progressive disease or death due to any cause. Progression is defined as per Cheson 1999, response criteria is:

Target Nodal SPD Progression: at least one node must be abnormal, and the SPD of all nodes must increase by ≥ 50% from its nadir SPD.

Target Extranodal SPD Progression: at least one extranodal lesion must be present and the SPD of all extranodal lesions must increase by ≥ 50% from its nadir SPD.

Also, if a patient had any unequivocal progression in non-target lesions; and detection of any new nodal lesion (LDi 15mm with an absolute increase of 5mm) his/her response was considered as Progressive disease.

Week 52
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Week 52
The Overall survival (OS) defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death from any cause up to 52 weeks or EOS.
Week 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From Screening (Day -28 to -1) up to 52 weeks
The safety and tolerability of DRL_RI and MabThera® in participants with CD20-positive, LTB-FL was evaluated.
From Screening (Day -28 to -1) up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)
Time Frame: On Day 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 12 post dose
The immunogenicity of the Proposed Rituximab Biosimilar (DRL_RI) with MabThera® among trial participants was compared.
On Day 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4, Week 12 post dose

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory-To compare ORR evaluated in accordance with the Lugano criteria
Time Frame: upto week 52
Overall response rate based on the Lugano criteria 14 for those subjects with available positron emission tomography (PET) data
upto week 52
Exploratory- to explore the PK parameters of DRL_RI and MabThera®, using a population-PK modelling approach
Time Frame: upto week 52
• Plasma concentrations of rituximab will be compared and summarized for the PK Sub-population by treatment group and visit at which samples were taken.
upto week 52
Exploratory- to explore the pharmacodynamic parameters of DRL_RI and MabThera
Time Frame: upto week 52
Potential differences in pharmacodynamic parameters (e.g., area under the effect curve [AUEC] of circulating B-cells depletion) for DRL_RI and MabThera® will be investigated
upto week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Eliso Sopia, MD, Parexel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 15, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Follicular Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on DRL_RI (Proposed rituximab biosimilar)

3
Subscribe