Introduction of the Vapor Treatment in The Netherlands (NEVEL)

February 25, 2022 updated by: Dirk-Jan Slebos, University Medical Center Groningen

Introduction in the NEtherlands of the Vapor Treatment for Patients With Severe Emphysema: a New Lungvolume Reduction Treatment

Rationale: The bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using vapor was found to be effective and the treatment has an acceptable safety profile. The results of this trial has led to the inclusion of this treatment in the COPD GOLD guidelines in 2019. In the Netherlands the treatment has not been performed so far but the treatment device has been made available to the UMCG hospital to perform emphysema treatments. Some of the patients refered to the UMCG could benefit from the Vapor treatment and therefore with this treatment we will be able to treat patients who have no other treatment options left.

Objective: The overall aim of this study is to gain experience with the Thermal Vapor treatment by investigating the safety and efficacy of the treatment.

Primary Objective:

The primary objective is to investigate the change in Lung function (measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)) between baseline and 6 months after the Thermal Vapor treatment.

Study designThis study will be a prospective observational, single center study. All patients that undergo the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using thermal Vapor will be asked if their data can be captured in the database.

Study population: Patients with severe COPD who undergo the Thermal Vapor treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

Rationale: The STEP-UP trial investigated the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using vapor and showed that the treatment group significantly improved after 6 months compared to the control group in Lung function and quality of life. The authors also concluded that the treatment has an acceptable safety profile. The results of this trial has led to the inclusion of this treatment in the COPD GOLD guidelines in 2019. In the Netherlands the treatment has not been performed so far but the treatment device has been made available to the UMCG hospital to perform emphysema treatments. Yearly, approximately 600 severe emphysema patients are refered to the UMCG for a bronchoscopic treatment but only approximately 10% is suitable for a treatment with endobronchial valves or coils. Some of the other patients could benefit from the Vapor treatment and therefore with this treatment we will be able to treat patients who have no other treatment options left.

Objective: The overall aim of this study is to gain experience with the Thermal Vapor treatment by investigating the safety and efficacy of the treatment.

Primary Objective:

The primary objective is to investigate the change in Lung function (measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)) between baseline and 6 months after the Thermal Vapor treatment.

Secondary Objectives:

Safety

• A secondary objective is to investigate the safety of the Thermal Vapor treatment by recoding all the adverse events that occur between baseline and 1 year follow up after treatment.

Efficacy • A secondary objective is to investigate the change in Lung function, lung hyperinflation, quality of life, dyspnea, CT parameters and exercise capacity between baseline and 6 and 12 months follow up after treatment.

Longterm

• A secondary objective is to investigate the long term effect of the treatment in terms of change in Lung function, lung hyperinflation, quality of life and exercise capacity between baseline and up to 5 years follow up after treatment.

Study designThis study will be a prospective observational, single center study that will investigate the safety and efficacy of the InterVapor (Bronchoscopic Thermal Vapor Ablation System) that will be introduced in the Netherlands for the first time. All patients that undergo the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using thermal Vapor will be asked if their data can be captured in the database.

Study population: Patients with severe COPD who undergo the Thermal Vapor treatment.

Main study parameters: The primary objective is to investigate the change in Lung function which will be measured by Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) between baseline and 6 months after the Thermal Vapor treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with severe COPD who undergo the Thermal Vapor treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of COPD
  2. FEV1%pred <45% and FVC<70%pred,
  3. Severe lung hyperinflation: RV>175%pred and RV/TLC>55%
  4. Patients will have heterogeneous emphysema, as evidenced by high-resolution CT demonstrating a heterogeneity Index >1.2 in at least one segment to be treated.
  5. Nonsmoking for at least 6 months prior to entering the study
  6. Completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 6 months prior to treatment and/or regularly performing maintenance respiratory rehabilitation if initial supervised therapy occurred more than 6 months prior to baseline testing.
  7. Read, understood and signed the Informed Consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. FEV1 < 15% predicted
  2. Inability to walk >140 meters in 6 minutes (6MWD) following optimized medical management
  3. Subject has a history of recurrent clinically significant respiratory infections, defined as 3 or more hospitalizations for respiratory infection during the year prior to enrolment.
  4. Highly diseased lower lobes (tissue to air ratio of <11%)
  5. Presence of single large bulla (defined as > 1/3 volume of lobe) or a paraseptal distribution of emphysema in the treated lobe
  6. Subject has severe pulmonary hypertension defined by right ventricular systolic pressure >45 mm Hg via echocardiogram.
  7. Subject has severe gas exchange abnormalities as defined by: PaCO2 >8.0 kPa and/or PaO2 < 6.0 kPa (on room air).
  8. Subject has an inability to tolerate bronchoscopy under conscious sedation or general anaesthesia.
  9. Subject is taking >5 mg prednisone (or equivalent dose of a similar steroid) daily.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Vapor group
Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction treatment using Vapor
NA: it is not an interventional study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lung function
Time Frame: Between baseline and 6 months follow up
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Between baseline and 6 months follow up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety by number of adverse events
Time Frame: Between baseline and 1 year follow up
Number of all adverse events
Between baseline and 1 year follow up
Lung function
Time Frame: Between baseline and 1 year follow up
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second
Between baseline and 1 year follow up
Hyperinflation
Time Frame: Between baseline and 6 months follow up
Change in Residual Volume
Between baseline and 6 months follow up
Hyperinflation
Time Frame: Between baseline and 1 year follow up
Change in Residual Volume
Between baseline and 1 year follow up
Quality of life measured by a questionnaire
Time Frame: Between baseline and 6 months follow up
Change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (range 0-100, highest indicated worsed quality of life)
Between baseline and 6 months follow up
Quality of life measured by a questionnaire
Time Frame: Between baseline and 1 year follow up
Change in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score (range 0-100, highest indicated worsed quality of life)
Between baseline and 1 year follow up
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: Between baseline and 6 months follow up
Change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)
Between baseline and 6 months follow up
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: Between baseline and 12 months follow up
Change in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD)
Between baseline and 12 months follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dirk-Jan Slebos, MD PhD, Univeristy Medical Center Groningen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Only on request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emphysema or COPD

Clinical Trials on NA: intervention is not part of the study

3
Subscribe