Biologics for Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain (BIORA-PAIN) (BIORA-PAIN)

May 17, 2023 updated by: St George's, University of London

Comparison of Abatacept With Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Pain: A Phase IV Trial

It is increasingly recognized that although suppression of inflammation is a treatment goal in rheumatoid arthritis, many people who have control of their inflammation continue to experience pain. A number of studies have recently shown that by measuring further characteristics of pain in rheumatoid arthritis, e.g. neuropathic pain, quantitative sensory testing, compared with objective measures of inflammation, it is possible to acquire more detailed information about the level of pain in relation to inflammation that a patient with rheumatoid arthritis is experiencing, which could assist in developing their care.

In this study, the investigators will explore validated endpoints for pain including the Visual Analogue Scale for pain, neuropathic pain scores and quantitative sensory testing for pain.

The investigators will evaluate in a population-based study, the pain profile using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), neuropathic pain assessment, quantitative sensory testing (QST) by pain pressure thresholds (PPT) in comparison to markers of inflammation in order to assess the difference in pain outcomes between baseline pre- and post- treatment in a population of participants with active Rheumatoid Arthritis treated with abatacept and Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) inhibitors respectively. All measures will be conducted systematically in the abatacept and TNF inhibitor groups pre- and post-treatment with respective biologic agents. Participants with active Rheumatoid Arthritis who may be eligible for biologic treatment will be screened for enrolment into the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Primary objective To examine: Pain characteristics in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis receiving abatacept biologic therapy versus TNF inhibitor therapy in the form of adalimumab.

To establish if there are differences in pain outcomes by patient reported scores, objective measures of pain using quantitative sensory testing and inflammatory markers in participants receiving biologic therapies for rheumatoid arthritis.

Population: The population being assessed in this study are participants with active rheumatoid arthritis with a disease activity score of greater than 5.1.

Intervention: Subjects will be randomized to treatment with abatacept or adalimumab for active rheumatoid arthritis

Comparison group: Abatacept is being compared to adalimumab therapy in the trial

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 OPQ
        • Hotung Centre for Musculoskeletal Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active rheumatoid arthritis causing pain and functional impairment with DAS28 >5.1 -Has already received usual care for inflammatory arthritis including conventional DMARD therapy e.g. methotrexate, sulfasalazine, leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine on stable dose of csDMARD for at least 4 weeks prior to study drug initiation
  • Willing to participate in the study over a 12-month period
  • Desirably to have positive antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (ACPA/CCP)
  • Between 18 and 75 years of age

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or pregnancy planned over next 12 months
  • Current or previous unsuccessful use of the biologics abatacept or adalimumab
  • Co-existing other autoimmune condition, e.g. systemic lupus erythematosus, -Sjogren's syndrome, connective tissue disease, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, gout
  • Recent surgery in the last 3 months or imminent surgery in the next 12 months
  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Previous history of cancer in the last 5 years
  • Previous history of multiple sclerosis
  • Uncontrolled heart failure, hypertension or diabetes mellitus
  • Known history of fibromyalgia or other chronic pain disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Abatacept
Drug administered to participants with active rheumatoid arthritis
Subjects will be randomized to treatment with either abatacept or adalimumab
Other Names:
  • Orencia
Active Comparator: Adalimumab
Comparator drug administered to participants with active rheumatoid arthritis
Subjects will be randomized to treatment with either abatacept or adalimumab
Other Names:
  • Humira

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the Visual Analogue Score for Pain
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The Visual Analogue Score for Pain is a pain score which has a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10
0, 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Change in the Neuropathic pain questionnaire: PainDETECT
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 months
The painDETECT pain questionnaire is a numerical rated score for neuropathic pain
0, 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Change in Quantitative sensory testing
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Quantitative sensory testing measures numerical values for pain in specific regions of testing
0, 3, 6, 9, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Blood markers
Time Frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Pain biomarkers in serum
0, 3, 6, 9, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Prof Sofat, MD, PhD, St George's, University of London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Published data will be reported in publications from the trial. Data will be shared with other researchers on written request

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Abatacept Injection

3
Subscribe