- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04279054
Decreased Neuraxial Morphine After Cesarean Delivery
Decreased Neuraxial Morphine and Adjunctive Peripheral Nerve Blockade to Reduce Severity of Side Effects and Opioid Use After Cesarean Delivery
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Regional anesthesia has been associated with reduced opioid consumption after surgery. Cesarean delivery is one of the most commonly performed surgeries worldwide and women undergoing cesarean delivery are often young, opioid-naïve, and motivated to recover quickly in an effort to better care for their newborn. However, approximately 1 in 300 opioid naïve women become persistent prescription opioid users following cesarean delivery . Hence, it is important to optimize post-cesarean pain control while limiting exposure to opioids. Currently, standard therapy includes the use of neuraxial morphine (NM) in combination with a multi-modal regime in an effort to limit excessive opioid use after cesarean delivery. The current typical dose of NM that is given prior to cesarean delivery at the investigator's center is 150 mcg. Importantly, NM doses as low as 100 mcg have been shown to provide comparable analgesia while reducing side effects such as itching. The side-effect profile associated with NM includes up to 87% of patients experiencing pruritus and up to 70% experiencing urinary retention. Nausea and vomiting also lead to significant discomfort for a new mother trying to provide acute infant care.
Adjunctive Peripheral Nerve Blockade has recently been introduced to reduce postoperative pain and opioid use. Studies have assessed the usefulness of the transversus abdmoninis plane (TAP) block after cesarean delivery. Another ultrasound-guided injection of local anesthetic in the fascial plane (truncal block) that is available at UAB and within the standard of care for patients undergoing abdominal surgery is the quadratus lumborum (QL) block. Because of its more posterior and caudal location, it is more likely to anesthetize the nerve fibers associated with pain from cesarean delivery.
This study will compare the use of 50mcg to 150mcg morphine for the goal of decreasing side effects of medication with lower dose in all patients who receive a QL block
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Brian Casey, MD
- Phone Number: (205) 934-5612
- Email: bcasey@uabmc.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ayamo Oben, MD
- Phone Number: 6783139795
- Email: aoben2015@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
- UAB Women and Infants Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All women presenting for scheduled cesarean delivery who desire a QL block
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women with pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia
- Women with pregnancies complicated by insulin-treated diabetes
- Women with pregnancies complicated by placental abnormalities
- Women with pregnancies complicated by a history of opioid use disorder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Group A: 150 mcg morphine
Patients in this group will receive 150mcg of morphine in their neuraxial block
|
Use of 150mcg of morphine sulfate for neuraxial block (dosing difference)
|
Experimental: Group B: 50 mcg morphine
Patients in this group will receive 50mcg of morphine in their neuraxial block
|
Use of 50mcg of morphine sulfate for neuraxial block (dosing difference)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Outcome of side effects of intervention: pruritus
Time Frame: One assessment during hospital stay - up to postoperative day 2 (2 days following cesarean delivery)
|
Incidence of primary outcome surrogate marker by need for medication for pruritus based on verbal complaints from patient (Medication given: Yes or No)
|
One assessment during hospital stay - up to postoperative day 2 (2 days following cesarean delivery)
|
Outcome of side effects of intervention: nausea
Time Frame: One assessment during hospital stay - up to postoperative day 2
|
Incidence of primary outcome surrogate marker by need for medication for nausea based on verbal complaints from patient (Medication given: Yes or No)
|
One assessment during hospital stay - up to postoperative day 2
|
Outcome of side effects of intervention: urinary retention
Time Frame: One assessment during hospital stay - up to postoperative day 2 (2 days following cesarean delivery)
|
Incidence of primary outcome surrogate marker by need for removal of foley catheter as measure for urinary retention
|
One assessment during hospital stay - up to postoperative day 2 (2 days following cesarean delivery)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Maternal secondary outcomes from intervention
Time Frame: One assessment during hospital stay - up to postoperative day 2 (2 days following cesarean delivery)
|
Total amount of morphine use during hospital stay (cumulative morphine administered to control pain during hospital stay)
|
One assessment during hospital stay - up to postoperative day 2 (2 days following cesarean delivery)
|
Maternal secondary outcomes from intervention
Time Frame: One measurement during entire hospital stay
|
Incidence of daily pain scores (measured by pain score ratings: 1-10); 1: lowest pain score 10: maximum pain score
|
One measurement during entire hospital stay
|
Neonatal secondary outcomes from intervention
Time Frame: Within first hour of birth
|
Apgar scores
|
Within first hour of birth
|
Neonatal secondary outcomes from intervention
Time Frame: Within first hour of birth
|
Incidence of babies with signs of respiratory depression
|
Within first hour of birth
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ayodeji Sanusi, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- McDonnell JG, Curley G, Carney J, Benton A, Costello J, Maharaj CH, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):186-91, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3.
- Blanco R, Ansari T, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Nov;32(11):812-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000299.
- Abdallah FW, Laffey JG, Halpern SH, Brull R. Duration of analgesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdominal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Nov;111(5):721-35. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet214. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
- Blanco R, Ansari T, Riad W, Shetty N. Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):757-762. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000495. Erratum In: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:111.
- McMorrow RC, Ni Mhuircheartaigh RJ, Ahmed KA, Aslani A, Ng SC, Conrick-Martin I, Dowling JJ, Gaffney A, Loughrey JP, McCaul CL. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):706-12. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer061.
- Donauer K, Bomberg H, Wagenpfeil S, Volk T, Meissner W, Wolf A. Regional vs. General Anesthesia for Total Knee and Hip Replacement: An Analysis of Postoperative Pain Perception from the International PAIN OUT Registry. Pain Pract. 2018 Nov;18(8):1036-1047. doi: 10.1111/papr.12708. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
- Bateman BT, Franklin JM, Bykov K, Avorn J, Shrank WH, Brennan TA, Landon JE, Rathmell JP, Huybrechts KF, Fischer MA, Choudhry NK. Persistent opioid use following cesarean delivery: patterns and predictors among opioid-naive women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):353.e1-353.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.016. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
- Girgin NK, Gurbet A, Turker G, Aksu H, Gulhan N. Intrathecal morphine in anesthesia for cesarean delivery: dose-response relationship for combinations of low-dose intrathecal morphine and spinal bupivacaine. J Clin Anesth. 2008 May;20(3):180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.07.010.
- Faiz SHR, Alebouyeh MR, Derakhshan P, Imani F, Rahimzadeh P, Ghaderi Ashtiani M. Comparison of ultrasound-guided posterior transversus abdominis plane block and lateral transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing cesarean section: a randomized double-blind clinical trial study. J Pain Res. 2017 Dec 19;11:5-9. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S146970. eCollection 2018.
- Champaneria R, Shah L, Wilson MJ, Daniels JP. Clinical effectiveness of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for pain relief after caesarean section: a meta-analysis. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2016 Dec;28:45-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
- Ng SC, Habib AS, Sodha S, Carvalho B, Sultan P. High-dose versus low-dose local anaesthetic for transversus abdominis plane block post-Caesarean delivery analgesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):252-263. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.084. Epub 2017 Dec 5.
- Quinlan JD, Murphy NJ. Cesarean delivery: counseling issues and complication management. Am Fam Physician. 2015 Feb 1;91(3):178-84.
- Lavand'homme P. Postcesarean analgesia: effective strategies and association with chronic pain. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;19(3):244-8. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192815.22989.61.
- Committee Opinion No. 666: Optimizing Postpartum Care. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;127(6):e187-e192. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001487.
- Telnes A, Skogvoll E, Lonnee H. Transversus abdominis plane block vs. wound infiltration in Caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Apr;59(4):496-504. doi: 10.1111/aas.12498.
- Hirabayashi M, Doi K, Imamachi N, Kishimoto T, Saito Y. Prophylactic Pentazocine Reduces the Incidence of Pruritus After Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia With Opioids: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1930-1934. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002060.
- Aly M, Ibrahim A, Farrag W, Abdelsalam K, Mohamed H, Tawfik A. Pruritus after intrathecal morphine for cesarean delivery: incidence, severity and its relation to serum serotonin level. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2018 Aug;35:52-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00000196
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anesthesia
-
Samsun UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Regional Anesthesia | Anesthesia ManagementTurkey
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAnesthesia, Local | Anesthesia | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectGermany
-
Novocol Pharmaceutical of Canada, Inc.CompletedAnesthesia, Local | Dental Anesthesia | Anesthesia, ReversalUnited States
-
Aligarh Muslim UniversityCompletedAnesthesia | Anesthesia Intubation Complication | Anesthesia; Adverse EffectIndia
-
Universitas Sebelas MaretIndonesia Endowment Fund for EducationNot yet recruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; Reaction
-
University of PecsCompleted
-
Hormozgan University of Medical SciencesUnknownAnesthesia | Anesthesia; FunctionalIran, Islamic Republic of
-
University of ChicagoRecruitingAnesthesia | Patient Satisfaction | Anesthesia Risks | Anesthesia Consent | Consent RetentionUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisINSERM UMR-942, Paris, France; M3DISIMNot yet recruitingPrediction Models for Cardiovascular and Neurocognitive Disease Risk in the General Population (CME)Anesthesia, Local | AnesthesiaFrance
-
Matthew BorzageRecruitingAnesthesia | Anesthesia; ReactionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Morphine Sulfate 150 mcg
-
Novartis PharmaceuticalsCompleted
-
DBV TechnologiesCompletedFood AllergyUnited States, Canada
-
Radius Health, Inc.Nordic Bioscience A/SCompletedPost Menopausal OsteoporosisPoland, Denmark, United States, Estonia
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityCompletedCesarean Section | Spinal Anesthesia | Postoperative AnalgesiaTurkey
-
Roxane LaboratoriesCompleted
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Arthritis FoundationCompletedDepression | Anxiety | Degenerative Disc Disease | Chronic Low Back PainUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesTerminated
-
Pacira Pharmaceuticals, IncCompletedPain Management | Elective Cesarean SectionUnited States
-
Oregon Health and Science UniversityEnrolling by invitationCesarean Section | Anesthesia, ObstetricUnited States