Effects of Specific Pelvic Stabilization Exercise in Postpartum Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain Women

March 25, 2024 updated by: YI-JU TSAI

Effects of Specific Pelvic Stabilization Exercise With Transabdominal Ultrasonography-guided Biofeedback in Postpartum Women Suffering From Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain

Postpartum women with PPGP receiving specific pelvic stabilization exercise training with transabdominal sonography-guided Biofeedback would have better improvements on muscle functions, physical functions, pain, and disability compared to the regular pelvic stabilization exercise group

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 701
        • National Cheng Kung University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • postpartum : ≥ 3 months
  • pregnancy-related pelvic pain
  • pain location is located between posterior iliac crest and gluteal fold
  • Clinical screening test for pelvic pain :

ASLR : positive and SI joint ≥ 2 (+ symphysis ≥ 1)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lumbar or pelvic surgery
  • other causes of pelvic pain (such as fractures)
  • Radiculopathy
  • other health problems, such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, rheumatism , etc
  • daily activities limited , unable to complete the experiment
  • communication disorders
  • mental disorder
  • pregnancy
  • have been trained in stable muscle strength in the past.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Transabdominal Sonography-guided Biofeedback group
pelvic floor muscle training with transabdominal sonography-guided Biofeedback
pelvic floor muscle training
pelvic floor muscle combined global muscle exercise training
education of pelvic girdle
Active Comparator: Exercise group
pelvic floor muscle training
pelvic floor muscle training
pelvic floor muscle combined global muscle exercise training
education of pelvic girdle
Placebo Comparator: Control group
pelvic girdle education
education of pelvic girdle
Placebo Comparator: Health group
pelvic girdle education
education of pelvic girdle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Muscle function measures of abdominal muscle
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Untrasonography image for muscle thickness of abdominal muscle during rest and ASLR test.
8 weeks
Muscle function measures of inter recti distance
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Untrasonography image for muscle thickness of inter recti distance during rest, maximum contraction, and ASLR test.
8 weeks
Muscle function measures of pelvic floor muscle control
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Untrasonography image for muscle thickness of pelvic floor muscle control during rest, maximum contraction, and ASLR test.
8 weeks
functional performance of ASLR fatigue task
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Participants lifted the heel of the test leg to 20 cm for as long as possible. Participants were required to maintain pressure in the cuff beneath their back as close to 40 mm Hg as possible. Visual feedback of cuff pressure was provided throughout the task, but no instruction was given on how to affect cuff pressure. Task failure was defi ned as an inability to maintain heel height 10 cm or more off the plinth and/or a change in cuff pressure of 20 mm Hg or more.
8 weeks
functional performance of timed up and go test
Time Frame: 8 weeks

Test instructions were given in Norwegian. Translated into English, the instructions were as follows: 'After "ready, set, go" stand up, walk as fast as you can until you cross the white line, turn around, and walk back to the chair and sit down again'. The white line was positioned 3m from the patient's starting position.

'After "ready, set, go" stand up, walk as fast as you can until you cross the white line, turn around, and walk back to the chair and sit down again'. The white line was positioned 3m from the patient's starting position.

8 weeks
functional performance of 6m timed walk test(fast walking)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Subjects commenced the test in standing with their toes up against the tape marker. Test instructions translated into English were as follows: 'After "ready, set, go", walk as fast as you can up to the last white line without stopping or speaking along the way'. Performances were timed (to the nearest 100th of a second) between the 2m and 8m markers and later converted into speed in metres per second.
8 weeks
pain intensity measure of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) is a self-reported instrument assessing average pain intensity in currently. Possible score range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain).
8 weeks
pain intensity measure of pelvic girdle questionnaire (PGQ)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
pelvic girdle questionnaire(PGQ) is a self-reported instrument assessing pelvic girdle pain intensity in currently. Questionnaire consisting of 20 activity items and 5 symptom items on a 4-point response scale. Possible score range from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain).
8 weeks
pain intensity measure of Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire(ODI) is a self-reported instrument assessing patient's permanent functional disability in currently. For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5. The higher the score, the greater the degree of disability.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General health
Time Frame: 8 weeks
36-item Short-Form Survey(SF-36)
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NCKU-TSAI

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Girdle Pain

Clinical Trials on pelvic floor muscle training

3
Subscribe